制造业组织冗余、创业导向与企业绩效研究
Research on Manufacturing Organization Redundancy, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance
DOI: 10.12677/MM.2018.83031, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 李九一*:南京师范大学商学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 企业组织冗余创业导向企业绩效制造业中介作用Organizational Redundancy Entrepreneurship Orientation Firm Performance Manufacturing Mediating Role
摘要: 制造业企业面临经济转型,产能过剩和效率较低使得资源的冗余成为必然,冗余的存在使得企业经营绩效受到影响。本文通过实证研究,检验了组织冗余与企业财务绩效和市场绩效的关系,并引入创业导向这一中介变量,为制造业企业在转型期提供经营发展的建议。文章选取了2010~2016年沪深A股民营制造业315家上市公司进行实证研究,结果发现:企业组织冗余与企业财务绩效和市场绩效皆呈现显著的负相关关系;企业组织冗余与创业导向呈现显著的负相关关系;创业导向在组织冗余和企业财务绩效和市场绩效之间存在中介效应关系。建议企业在进行组织冗余的合理管理中,不仅要努力提高经营、管理和生产的效率,而且要注意开拓市场,加大企业创业行为导向,从而能够提升绩效。
Abstract: Manufacturing enterprises are faced with economic restructuring. Overcapacity and low efficiency make the redundancy of resources inevitable. Through empirical research, this article examines the relationship between organizational redundancies and corporate performance, and introduces entrepreneurial orientation as an intermediary variable. The article selects 315 listed companies in the private-sector A-shares manufacturing industry of Shanghai and Shenzhen to carry out an empirical study. The results show that: there is a significant negative correlation between or-ganizational redundancy and corporate performance, and also a significant negative correlation between organizational redundancy and entrepreneurial orientation; entrepreneurial orientation has an intermediate effect relationship between organizational redundancy and corporate per-formance. It is suggested that enterprises should not only strive to improve the efficiency of man-agement and production in the rational management of organizational redundancy, but also pay attention to open up the market and increase the orientation of corporate entrepreneurial behavior so as to improve performance.
文章引用:李九一. 制造业组织冗余、创业导向与企业绩效研究[J]. 现代管理, 2018, 8(3): 257-267. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2018.83031

参考文献

[1] Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (2003) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 4, 81-95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Bourgeois, L.J. (1981) On the Measurement of Organizational Slack. Academy of Management Review, 6, 29-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Singh, J.V. (1986) Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational De-cision Making. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 562-585.
[5] Love, E.G. and Nohria, N. (2005) Reducing Slack: The Per-formance Consequences of Downsizing by Large Industrial Firms, 1977-93. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1087-1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Sharfman, M.P., Wolf, G., Chase, R.B., et al. (1988) Antecedents of Organizational Slack. Academy of Management Review, 13, 601-614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Miller, D. (1983) The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science, 29, 770-791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G. (2009) Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Moch, M.K. and Pondy, L.R. (1977) The Structure of Chaos: Organized Anarchy as a Response to Ambiguity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 351-362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Peng, M.W. and Heath, P.S. (1996) The Growth of the Firm in Planned Economies in Transition: Institutions, Organizations, and Strategic Choice. Academy of Management Review, 21, 492-528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Morrow, J.L. (2007) Creating Value in the Face of Declining Performance: Firm Strategies and Organizational Recovery. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 271-283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Nohria, N. and Gulati, R. (1996) Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation? Academy of Man-agement Journal, 39, 1245-1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Firms, T.G.O. (1999) The Sustainability of the Entre-preneurial Orientation-Performance Relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 24, 37-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Zahra, S.A. and Covin, J.G. (2015) Contextual Influences on the Corporate Entrepreneurship-Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 10, 43-58.
[15] Tobin, J.A. (1969) General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory. Journal of Money Credit & Banking, 1, 15-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Tan, J. and Peng, M.W. (2004) Organizational Slack and Firm Performance during Eco-nomic Transitions: Two Studies from an Emerging Economy. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 307-307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 蒋春燕, 赵曙明. 组织冗余与绩效的关系: 中国上市公司的时间序列实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2004(5): 108-115.
[18] 郭立新, 陈传明. 组织冗余与企业技术创新绩效的关系研究——基于中国制造业上市公司面板数据的实证分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010, 31(11): 52-56.
[19] Gomes, L. and Ramaswamy, K. (1999) An Empirical Examination of the Form of the Relationship between Multinationality and Performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 173-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 李华晶, 邢晓东. 高管团队与公司创业战略:基于高阶理论和代理理论融合的实证研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2007, 28(9): 139-144.
[21] 杨林. 创业型企业高管团队垂直对差异与创业战略导向: 产业环境和企业所有制的调节效应[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014, 17(1): 134-144.