有力筋块体自由摇摆振动恢复系数有限元分析
FEM Analysis of Restitution Coefficient of Free Rocking Block with Tendon
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2018.75086, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 梁艳苹*, 苏小卒:同济大学土木工程学院建筑工程系,上海
关键词: 块体自由摇摆振动恢复系数力筋ABAQUSBlock Free Rocking Coefficient of Restitution Tendon ABAQUS
摘要: 采用ABAQUS数值模拟方法,建立了有力筋块体自由摇摆振动的数值模型,以块体的高宽比、力筋刚度、初始位移为分析参数,研究了不同参数水平下块体自由摇摆振动的恢复系数。研究发现恢复系数具有一定的随机离散性;高宽比对恢复系数有显著影响,力筋的施加以及初始位移的大小对恢复系数几乎没有影响;恢复系数的理论值,可以直接用于高瘦型块体的计算,但对矮胖型块体的计算则误差较大。给出了不同情况下恢复系数的试验平均值,可供计算时参考。
Abstract: The values of coefficient of restitution (COR) of free rocking blocks with tendons were investigated by establishing numerical models using ABAQUS. The analysis parameters were the aspect ratio, tendon stiffness, and initial displacement. The results reveal that the COR showed some random nature. The aspect ratio had a significant effect on the COR, however the tendon stiffness and the initial displacement had little effect on the COR. The theoretical COR formula was accurate enough for slender blocks, but showed larger errors for dumpy blocks. The average values of COR for cases covered in this paper were given for reference use in related calculations.
文章引用:梁艳苹, 苏小卒. 有力筋块体自由摇摆振动恢复系数有限元分析[J]. 土木工程, 2018, 7(5): 725-733. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2018.75086

参考文献

[1] 周颖, 吕西林. 摇摆结构及自复位结构研究综述[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2011, 32(9): 1-10.
[2] 曹海韵, 潘鹏, 叶列平, 等. 混凝土框架摇摆墙结构体系的抗震性能分析[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2011, 28(1): 64-69.
[3] 吕西林, 崔晔, 刘兢兢. 自复位钢筋混凝土框架结构振动台试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2014, 35(1): 19-26.
[4] 鲁亮, 樊宇, 吕西林, 等. 受控摇摆式钢筋混凝土框架抗震机理研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 1(1): 66-76.
[5] Housner, G.W. (1963) The Behavior of Inverted Pendulum Structures during Earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 53, 403-417.
[6] Peña, F., Prieto, F., Lourenço, P.B., et al. (2007) On the Dynamics of Rocking Motion of Single Rigid-Block Structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36, 2383-2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Elgawady, M.A., Ma, Q., Butterworth, J.W., et al. (2011) Effects of Interface Material on the Performance of Free Rocking Blocks. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 40, 375-392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Cheng, C.-T. (2007) Energy Dissipation in Rocking Bridge Piers under Free Vibration Tests. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36, 503-518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Nazari, M., Aaleti, S. and Sritharan, S. (2014) Shake Table Testing of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls. Proceedings of the 10th National Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Anchorage, AK.
[10] Vassiliou, M.F. and Makris, N. (2015) Dynamics of the Vertically Restrained Rocking Column. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 141, 04015049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Schau, H. and Johannes, M. (2014) Numerical Analysis of Rocking of Unanchored Bodies Subjected to Seismic Load Using Finite Element Analyses. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN, Porto, 30 June-2 July 2014.
[12] Kalliontzis, D. and Sri, S. (2014) A Finite Element Approach for Modelling Controlled Rocking Systems. 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul, 25-29 August 2014.
[13] Kalliontzis, D. (2014) Dynamic Decay of Motion of Rocking Concrete Members. MD Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
[14] Kalliontzis, D., Sritharan, S. and Schultz, A. (2016) Improved Coefficient of Restitution Estimation for Free Rocking Members. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142, 06016002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef