基于TOPSIS的区间直觉模糊集多属性群决策方法研究综述
The Research Reviewed of the Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making Method for Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Based on TOPSIS
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2018.710149, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李敏, 苏变萍, 张强强：西安建筑科技大学理学院，陕西 西安
关键词: 多属性群决策方法；区间直觉模糊集；权重；TOPSIS；Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making； Interval-Valued Intuitioniastic Fuzzy Set； Weight； TOPSI
摘要: 关于区间直觉模糊集多属性群决策方法的研究已然成为当前决策领域的一个热点，并且，被广泛应用于各类决策问题中。因此，为了能够更好地了解区间直觉模糊集在群决策问题中的排序方法、更好地将其应用到决策问题的各个领域，本文介绍了区间直觉模糊集在多属性决策与多属性群决策问题中的研究现状，分析了在多属性群决策问题中确定专家权重的方法及其不足，在区间直觉模糊集上提出了一种基于TOPSIS的确定专家权重的新方法，进一步给出了一种基于新权重方法的区间直觉模糊集多属性群决策方法，最后对其今后可能的发展方向进行了预测。
Abstract: In multiple attribute group decision making, because every expert has his own knowledge and expertise, different experts have different weights for different attributes. A new method to determine the expert’s weights is put forward based on the TOPSIS method in interval-triangular fuzzy setting. If the evaluation value is close to the positive idea evaluation value and far away from the negative ideal evaluation value, it will be given a large weight; otherwise, the evaluation value will be given a small weight. Experience shows that the weight of experts determined by this method has a significant effect on solving practical decision-making problems. A new method of multiple attribute interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making is presented in this paper, including the attribute weights which are completely known, partly known and completely unknown. Finally, the feasibility and validity of this method are proved by our examples.
文章引用：李敏, 苏变萍, 张强强. 基于TOPSIS的区间直觉模糊集多属性群决策方法研究综述[J]. 应用数学进展, 2018, 7(10): 1278-1288. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2018.710149

参考文献

[1] 廖虎昌. 复杂模糊多属性决策理论与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
[2] 吴群, 吴澎, 周礼刚. 基于联系数的区间二元语义模糊多属性群决策方法[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 33(1): 1-8.
[3] Zhou, L., Tao, Z., Chen, H., et al. (2014) Continuous Interval Valued Intuitonistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Applications to Group Decision Making. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 38, 2190-2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] 汪新凡. 基于联系数纯语言多属性群决策方法[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 23(6): 580-584.
[5] Zadeh, L.A. (1965) Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Atanassov, K. (1986) Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87-96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Atanassov, K. (1989) More on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 33, 37-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Gau, W.L. and Buuehrer, D.J. (1993) Vague Sets. IEEE Translation on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 23, 610-614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Bustine, H. and Burillo, P. (1996) Vague Sets Are Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79, 403-405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Atanassov, K. and Gargov, G. (1989) Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 31, 343-349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] 徐泽水. 区间直觉模糊信息的集成方法及其在决策中的应用[J]. 控制与决策, 2007, 22(2): 215-219.
[12] 魏翠萍, 夏梅梅, 张玉忠. 基于区间直觉模糊集的多准则决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2009, 24(8): 1230-1234.
[13] 卫贵武. 权重信息不完全的区间直觉模糊数多属性决策方法[J]. 管理学报, 2008, 5(2): 208-212.
[14] 胡辉, 徐泽水. 基于TOPSIS的区间直觉模糊多属性决策法[J]. 模糊系统与数学, 2007, 21(5): 108-112.
[15] 王坚强. 信息不完全确定的多准则区间直觉模糊决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2006, 21(11): 1253-1256.
[16] Xu, Z.S. and Yager, R. (2009) Intuitionistic and Interval-Valued Intutionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations and Their Measures of Similarity for the Evaluation of Agreement within a Group. Fuzzy Optimization Decision Making, 8, 123-139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Xu, Z.S. (2007) On Similarity Measures of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Their Application to Pattern Recognitions. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 23, 139-143.
[18] Xu, Z.S. and Chen, J. (2007) On Geometric Aggregation over Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information. In: 4th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, IEEE Computer Society, Haikou, Vol. 2, 466-471.
[19] 徐泽水, 陈剑. 一种基于区间直觉判断矩阵的群决策方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007, 27(x): 126-133.
[20] 梁昌勇, 戚筱雯, 张俊岭, 等. 基于诱导型区间直觉模糊混合算子的群决策方法[J]. 系统工程学报, 2012, 27(6): 759-771.
[21] Wei, G.W. (2010) Some Induced Geometric Aggregation Operators with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information and Their Application to Group Decision Making. Applied Soft Computing, 10, 423-431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Wei, G.W. and Wang, X.R. (2007) Some Geometric Aggregation Operators on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Their Application to Group Decision Making. International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, Harbin, 15-19 December 2007, 495-499.
[23] Liu, P. (2014) Some Hamacher Aggregation Operators Based on the Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers and Their Application to Group Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22, 83-97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] Meng, F. and Tang, J. (2013) Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiattribute Group Decision Making Based on Cross Entropy Measure and Choquet Interal. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28, 1172-1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Qin, J. and Liu, X. (2013) Study on Interval Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making Method Based on Choquet. Information Technology and Quantitative Management, 17, 465-472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Xu, Z.S. (2010) A Method Based on Distance Measure for Interval-Valued Intuitionist Fuzzy Group Decision Making. Information Science, 18, 181-190.
[27] Park, D.G., Kwun, Y.C. and Park, J.H. (2009) Correlation Coefficient of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Its Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Problem. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 50, 1279-1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] Ye, F. (2010) An Extended TOPSIS Method with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers for Virtual Enterprise Partner Selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 7050-7055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[29] Wang, W. and Liu, X. (2013) An Extended LINMAP Method for Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making under Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 490-497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[30] Chen, S.M. and Niou, S.J. (2011) Fuzzy Multiple Attributes Group Decision-Making Based on Fuzzy Induced OWA Operators. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 4097-4108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[31] Chuu, S.J. (2009) Group Decision-Making Model Using Fuzzy Multiple Attributes Analysis for the Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 160, 586-602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] Hajiagha, S.H.R., Hashemi, S.S. and Zavadskas, E.K. (2013) A Complex Proportional Assessment Method for Group Decision Making in an Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19, 22-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Liu, P.D. (2011) A Weighted Aggregation Operators Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on Interval-Valued Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 1053-1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[34] Liu, P.D. (2012) An Approach to Group Decision Making Based on 2-Dimension Uncertain Linguistic Information. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18, 424-437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[35] Pang, J.F. and Liang, J.Y. (2012) Evaluation of the Results of Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making with Linguistic Information. Omega, 40, 294-301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[36] Ran, L.G. and Wei, G.W. (2015) Uncertain Prioritized Operators and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 21, 118-139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[37] Xu, Z.S. (2010) A Deviation-Based Approach to Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 57-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[38] Xu, Y.J., Merigó, J.M. and Wang, H.M. (2012) Linguistic Power Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 36, 5427-5444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[39] Wei, G.W. (2011) Some Generalized Aggregating Operators with Linguistic Information and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61, 32-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[40] Chen, S.M., Yang, M.W., Lee, L.W. and Yang, S.W. (2012) Fuzzy Multiple Attributes Group Decision Making Based on Ranking Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 5295-5308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[41] Chen, Z.P. and Yang, W. (2011) An MAGDM Based on Constrained FAHP and FTOPSIS and Its Application to Supplier Selection. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 54, 2802-2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[42] Lin, Y.H., Lee, P.C., Chang, T.P. and Ting, H.I. (2008) Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making Model under the Condition of Uncertain Information. Automation in Construction, 17, 792-797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[43] Su, W.H., Zeng, S.Z. and Ye, X.J. (2013) Uncertain Group Decision-Making with Induced Aggregation Operators and Euclidean Distance. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19, 431-447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[44] Wang, W.Z., Liu, X.W. and Qin, Y. (2012) Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making Models under Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 30, 121-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[45] Wu, Z.B. and Chen, Y.H. (2007) The Maximizing Deviation Method for Group Multiple Attribute Decision Making under Linguistic Environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 158, 1608-1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[46] Brock, H.W. (1980) The Problem of “Utility Weights” in Group Preference Aggregation. Operations Research, 28, 176-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[47] Keeney, R.L. and Kirkwood, C.W. (1975) Group Decision Making Using Cardinal Social Welfare Functions. Management Science, 22, 430-437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[48] Kim, S.H., Choi, S.H. and Kim, J.K. (1999) An Interactive Procedure for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making with Incomplete Information: Range-Based Approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 118, 139-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[49] Li, D.F. (2007) Compromise Ratio Method for Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making. Applied Soft Computing, 7, 807-817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[50] Olcer, A.I. and Odabasi, A.Y. (2005) A New Fuzzy Multiple Attributive Group Decision Making Methodology and Its Application to Propulsion/Manoeuvring System Selection Problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 166, 93-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[51] Ramanathan, R. and Ganesh, L.S. (1994) Group Preference Aggregation Methods Employed in AHP: An Evaluation and an Intrinsic Process for Deriving Members Weight Ages. European Journal of Operational Research, 79, 249-265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[52] Yue, Z.L. (2011) A Method for Group Decision-Making Based on Determining Weights of Decision Makers Using TOPSIS. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 35, 1926-1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[53] Yue, Z.L. (2012) Extension of TOPSIS to Determine Weight of Decision Maker for Group Decision Making Problems with Uncertain Information. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 6343-6350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[54] Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Methods and Applications, 375, 1-531.
[55] Park, J.H., Park, I.Y., Kwun, Y.C. and Tan, X.G. (2011) Extension of the TOPSIS Method for Decision Making Problems under Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 35, 2544-2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[56] Tan, C.Q. (2011) A Multi-Criteria Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making with Choquet Integral-Based TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 3023-3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[57] Lee, K.S., Park, K.S., Eum, Y.S., et al. (2001) Extended Methods for Identifying Dominance and Potential Optimality in Multicriteria Analysis with Imprecise Information. European Journal of Operational Research, 134, 557-563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[58] Kim, S.H. and Han, C.H. (1999) An Interactive Procedure for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Procedure with Incomplete Information. Computers & Operational Research, 26, 755-772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[59] Kim, S.H. and Han, C.H. (1999) An Interactive Procedure for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Procedure with Incomplete Information. Computers & Operational Research, 26, 755-772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐