大学生公正敏感性与公正判断的关系
The Relationship between the Justice Sensitivity and Justice Judgment of College Students
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2018.812207, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 申沁灵, 訾 非：北京林业大学，人文社会科学学院，北京
关键词: 公正敏感性；公正判断；家庭社会经济地位(SES)；角色卷入；Justice Sensitivity； Justice Judgment； Family Socioeconomic Status (SES)； Involvement of Roles
摘要: 本文采用问卷调查法和故事评价法对400名大学生进行调查，探究公正敏感性和公正判断的关系、角色卷入对公正判断的影响以及角色卷入对公正敏感性和公正判断之间关系的影响，同时还关注公正敏感性和公正判断的人口学变量特征。结果表明：① 公正敏感性总分和公正判断总分显著正相关；② 不同角色卷入下公正判断存在显著差异，当个体作为得利者角色卷入时公正敏感性与公正判断显著正相关，旁观者、受害者、施害者角色卷入下两者不存在显著相关；③ 公正敏感性在性别、地域、家庭社会经济地位、城乡等人口学变量上差异显著，公正判断在学科和家庭社会经济地位上差异显著。
Abstract: This paper uses questionnaire survey and story evaluation to survey 400 university students to explore the relationship between justice sensitivity and justice judgment, and the influence of in-volvement of roles on justice judgment, as well as the influence of role involvement on the rela-tionship between justice sensitivity and justice judgment. At the same time, this research focuses on the influence of demographic variables on justice sensitivity and justice judgment. The results show that: 1) justice sensitivity and justice judgment are significantly positively correlated; 2) different roles involved in the justice judgment. There are significant differences, and justice sensitivity and justice judgment are significantly positively correlated when the individual is the beneficiary; there are no significant correlation between justice sensitivity and justice judgment when individual is a victim, observer and perpetrator; 3) justice sensitivity has significant difference in gender, region, family socioeconomic status, household registration. Justice judgment has significant differences in the family socioeconomic status and disciplines.
文章引用：申沁灵, 訾非 (2018). 大学生公正敏感性与公正判断的关系. 心理学进展, 8(12), 1778-1786. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2018.812207

参考文献

[1] 郭永玉, 杨沈龙, 李静, 胡小勇(2015). 社会阶层心理学视角下的公平研究. 心理科学进展, 23(8), 1299-1311.
[2] 郭永玉, 周春燕(2014). 公正世界信念对低社会阶层的双重作用. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 40(1), 63-67.
[3] 李静(2014). 不同社会阶层对贫富差距的心理归因研究. 广州市: 世界图书出版公司.
[4] 马欣然, 任孝鹏, 徐江(2016). 中国人集体主义的南北方差异及其文化动力. 心理科学进展, 24(10), 1551-1555.
[5] 饶世权(2009). 论社会科学思维方式的作用——兼与自然科学思维的比较. 社会科学管理与评论, (2), 15-19.
[6] 斯诺(2003). 两种文化. 上海市: 上海科学技术出版社.
[7] 杨沈龙(2014). 不同社会阶层系统公正感的差异及其机制. 硕士论文, 武汉市: 华中师范大学.
[8] Baumert, A., & Schmitt, M. (2009). Justice-Sensitive Interpretations of Ambiguous Situations. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61, 6-12.[CrossRef] 
[9] Bondü, R., Hannuschke, M., Elsner, B., & Gollwitzer, M. (2016). Inter-Individual Stabilization of Justice Sensitivity in Childhood and Adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 64, 11-20.[CrossRef] 
[10] Gollwitzer, M., & Rothmund, T. (2011). What Exactly Are Victim-Sensitive Persons Sensitive to? Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 448-455.[CrossRef] 
[11] Gollwitzer, M., Schmitt, M., Förster, N., Montada, L., Ve-rantwortung, A., Trier, M. D. U., et al. (2001). Additive and Joint Effects of Account Components on Reactions towards Interactional Injustice. Journal of Bacteriology, 175, 5740-5791.
[12] Ham, J., & Bos, K. V. D. (2010). The Merits of Unconscious Processing of Directly and Indirectly Obtained Information About Social Justice. Social Cognition, 28, 180-190.[CrossRef] 
[13] Hiel, A. V., Cremer, D. D., & Stouten, J. (2008). The Personality Basis of Justice: The Five-Factor Model as an Integrative Model of Personality and Procedural Fairness Effects on Cooperation. European Journal of Personality, 22, 519-539.[CrossRef] 
[14] Jasso, G. (1994). Assessing Individual and Group Differences in the Sense of Justice: Framework and Application to Gender Differences in the Justice of Earnings. Social Science Research, 23, 368-406.[CrossRef] 
[15] Mikula, G. (1994). Perspective-Related Differences in Interpretations of Injustice by Victims and Victimizers. In: Lerner, M. J., & Mikula, G. (Eds.), Entitlement and the Affectional Bond (pp. 175-203). Boston, MA: Springer US.[CrossRef] 
[16] Mummendey, A., Linneweber, V., & Löschper, G. (2010). Actor or Victim of Aggression: Divergent Perspectives—Divergent Evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 297-311.[CrossRef] 
[17] Ran, R. H., Aarts, H., & Ferguson, M. J. (2005). Automatic Goal Inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 129-140.[CrossRef] 
[18] Sabbagh, C., Dar, Y., & Resh, N. (1994). The Structure of Social Justice Judgments: A Facet Approach. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 244-261.[CrossRef] 
[19] Schmitt, M. (1996). Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI). Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 3-20.[CrossRef] 
[20] Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010). The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial Validity, Location in the Personality Facet Space, Demographic Pattern, and Normative Data. Social Justice Research, 23, 211-238.[CrossRef] 
[21] Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2003). Justice Sensitivity: Assessment and Location in the Personality Space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202-211.[CrossRef] 
[22] Vliert, E. V. D., Yang, H., Wang, Y., & Ren, X. P. (2013). Climato-Economic Imprints on Chinese Collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 589-605.[CrossRef] 
[23] Wu, M. S., Schmitt, M., Zhou, C., Nartova-Bochaver, S., Astanina, N., Khachatryan, N., & Buxin, H. (2014). Examining Self-Advantage in the Suffering of Others: Cross-Cultural Differences in Beneficiary and Observer Justice Sensitivity among Chinese, Germans, and Russians. Social Justice Research, 27, 231-242.[CrossRef]