劳动力摩擦及其产业间配置与经济增长:一个基于两部门的研究
Labor Force Friction and Its Inter-Industry Allocation and Economic Growth: A Study Based on Two Sectors
DOI: 10.12677/MSE.2018.74036, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 白东北, 王 珏:西北大学经济管理学院,陕西 西安
关键词: 劳动力流动经济增长产业间配置劳动力摩擦Labor Mobility Economic Growth Inter-Industry Allocation Labor Friction
摘要: 本文通过构建两部门产业间劳动力配置效应模型,采用省级静态面板、省级动态面板以及省级面板门槛效应的分析方法,对理论模型进行计量检验。研究结果发现,农业部门劳动力转移到非农业部门的产业间劳动力配置效应对经济增长的影响存在倒U型关系;全部样本与中西部省份样本,劳动力从农业部门流动到非农业部门的产业间劳动力配置效应对经济增长产生正效应,而东部省份农业部门劳动力转移到非农业部门的产业间劳动力配置效应抑制经济增长。存在劳动力摩擦的两部门产业间劳动力配置效应对经济增长产生显著的负向影响占产业间劳动力配置总效应的37.5%,且东部省份的负向影响为−32.8%大于全样本与中西部省份地区,说明东部省份对外来务工人员包容性就业的制度阻碍严重抑制了经济增长。因此在经济进入新常态的情况下,减少劳动力摩擦促进产业间劳动力配置效应,为经济增长路径选择提供一个新思路。
Abstract: This paper constructs the model of labor allocation effect between two sectors, and uses the analysis methods of provincial static panel, provincial dynamic panel and provincial panel threshold effect to test the theoretical model. The results show that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the effect of labor force allocation between industries in the agricultural sector and non-agricultural sector on economic growth, and that the effect of labor force allocation between industries from the agricultural sector to the non-agricultural sector has a positive effect on eco-nomic growth in all the samples of central and western provinces. The inter-industry labor alloca-tion effect of the transfer of labor force from agricultural sector to non-agricultural sector in eastern provinces inhibits economic growth. The negative impact of labor force frictions on economic growth is 37.5% of the total effect of inter-industry labor force allocation, and the negative impact of the eastern provinces is −32.8% larger than that of the whole sample and the central and western provinces. This shows that the eastern provinces have institutional obstacles to the inclusive employment of migrant workers. Obstacles have severely inhibited economic growth. Therefore, when the economy enters a new normal, reducing labor friction promotes the effect of in-ter-industry labor allocation, and provides a new way of thinking for the choice of economic growth path.
文章引用:白东北, 王珏. 劳动力摩擦及其产业间配置与经济增长:一个基于两部门的研究[J]. 管理科学与工程, 2018, 7(4): 297-308. https://doi.org/10.12677/MSE.2018.74036

参考文献

[1] Lin, J.Y. (2011) New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development. The World Bank Research Observer, 26, 193-221.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Lin, J.Y. and Rosenblatt, D. (2012) Shifting Patterns of Economic Growth and rethinking Development. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 15, 171-194.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Massell, B.F. (1961) A Disaggregated View of Technical Change. Journal of Political Economy, 69, 547-557.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Denison, E. (1962) The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Choices before US. Supplementary Paper.
[5] Denison, E. (1979) Accounting for Slower Economic Growth: The United States in the 1970s. The Brooking Institution Press, Washing DC, 65.
[6] Denison, E. (1967) Why Growth Rates Differ: Postwar Experience in Nine Western Countries. Brooking Institution Press, Washington DC, 212-214.
[7] Denison, E. (1974) Accounting for United States Economic Growth 1929-1969. Brooking Institution Press, Washington DC, 287.
[8] Syrquin, M. (1984) Resource Reallocation and Productivity Growth in Hollis B, Economic Structure and Performance: Essays in Honour of Hollis B. Chenery. Academic Press, New York, 81.
[9] Dowrick, S. and Gemmel, N. (1991) Industrialization, Catching-Up, and Economic Growth: A Comparative Study across the World’s Capitalist Economies. The Economic Journal, 101, 263-275.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Young, A. (2003) Gold into Base Metals: Productivity Growth in the People’s Republic of China during the Reform Period. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 1220-1261.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Aldrighi, D. and Colistete, R.P. (2013) Industrial Growth and Structural Change: Brazil in a Long-Run Perspective. Department of Economics_FEA/USP, Working Paper NO 3.
[12] Sepp, J. and Varblance, U. (2014) The Decomposition of Productivity Gap between Estonia and Korea. Ordnugspolitische Diskurse (OPO), Working Paper NO 3.
[13] 钱纳里, 赛尔昆. 发展的型式: 1950-1970 [M]. 北京 经济科学出版社, 1988: 34-78.
[14] 钱纳里, 赛尔昆. 工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M]. 上海: 三联书店, 1989: 31-89.
[15] 张保法. 经济增长中的结构效应[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 1997(11): 33-35.
[16] 潘文卿. 中国农业剩余劳动力转移效益测评[J]. 统计研究, 1999(4): 31-34.
[17] 蔡昉, 王德文. 中国经济增长可持续性与劳动贡献[J]. 经济研究, 1999(10): 62-68.
[18] 胡永泰. 中国全要素生产率: 来自农业部门劳动力再配置的首要作用[J]. 经济研究, 1998(3): 33-41.
[19] 徐现祥, 舒元. 劳动力结构效应的实证分析[J]. 上海经济研究, 2001(2): 9-14.
[20] 郝大明. 1978-2014年中国劳动力配置效应的分离与实证[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 7: 16-29.
[21] 辛超, 张平, 袁富华. 资本与劳动力配置结构效应——中国案例与国际比较[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015(2): 5-17.
[22] 单豪杰. 中国资本存量K的再估算: 1952-2006年[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2008, 25(10): 17-31.