流调中心抑郁量表在成人群体中的模型比较
The Model Fit of CES-D in Chinese Adult Sample
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2018.812213, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘峻良, 任 芬, 房玉上：济南大学，教育与心理科学学院，山东 济南
关键词: 流调中心抑郁量表；抑郁；模型比较；成人群体；CES-D； Depression； Model Comparison； Adult Group
摘要: 检验流调中心抑郁量表(CES-D)在全国人口抽样中的最佳拟合模型。在全国各个地区进行分层随机抽样，抽取612名被试，对数据进行多个竞争模型的验证性因素分析，确定最佳结构模型，对其进行信度分析、内部一致性检验。结果发现：Yen等人研究的三因素模型相比其它模型获得了更好的拟合。拟合指数分别为：χ2 = 390.94*，CFI = 0.97，TLI = 0.96，RMSEA [90% CI] = [0.04, 0.06]，达到测量标准。各分量表内的Cronbach’s α系数为0.82~0.83，McDonald ω系数为0.83~0.85，总量表Cronbach’s α系数为0.88，McDonald ω系数为0.90。积极情绪因素对量表因素结构拟合贡献不大。相比于其它模型，CES-D中文版的三因素模型为全国人口抽样数据的最佳拟合模型。
Abstract: The purpose of the study is to examine the best fit model of CES-D in the Chinese sample. This research investigated 612 Chinese by stratified sampling in each area to obtain the greatest factor model about Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Chinese. Five factor competing models are chosen by confirmatory factor analysis. Findings supported Yen’s three-factor model-somatic symptoms, depressed affect and positive affect for the sample. The Cronbach’s α of three dimensions is from 0.82 to 0.83; McDonald ω is from 0.83 to 0.85. And the 3-factor model’s consistency reliability comes to 0.88. The positive affect factor only makes limited contributions to the model fit. Compared with other possible models, Yen’s three factor model of CES-D is more suitable for the Chinese adults.
文章引用：刘峻良, 任芬, 房玉上 (2018). 流调中心抑郁量表在成人群体中的模型比较. 心理学进展, 8(12), 1829-1837. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2018.812213

参考文献

[1] 陈祉妍, 杨小冬, 李新影(2009). 流调中心抑郁量表在我国青少年中的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(4), 443-445.
[2] 戴琴, 冯正直, 戴勤素(2009). 抑郁与归因方式关系研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 17(3), 337-341.
[3] 金婷, 张磊晶(2017). 我国常用的抑郁自评量表介绍及应用. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 17(5), 366-369.
[4] 侯杰泰, Herbert W. Marsh, 孙晓燕, 常建芳(2011). “开心” = “不开心” (反向计分)?—正反题目在测量上的结构方程分析. 中国心理学会成立90周年纪念大会暨全国心理学学术会议论文集(页522-522). 北京市: 中国心理学会.
[5] 温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什赫伯特(2004). 结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则. 心理学报, 36(2), 186-194.
[6] 霍平, 郑红光, 孙丽丽, 徐晓丽, 程显山(2000). 人际关系对抑郁症的影响. 国际护理学杂志, (5), 227-228.
[7] 凌宇, 魏勇, 蚁金瑶, 肖晶, 姚树桥(2008). CES-D在高中生中的因素结构研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(3), 265-267.
[8] 李灿, 辛玲(2008). 调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究. 中国卫生统计, 25(5), 541-544.
[9] 孙天义, 许远理, 郭春彦(2011). 任务转换的多脑区作用机制: 来自ERP的证据. 中国科学: 生命科学, 41(11), 1121-1133.
[10] 陶沙(2006). 乐观、悲观倾向与抑郁的关系及压力、性别的调节作用. 心理学报, 38(6), 886-901.
[11] 王孟成(2014). 潜变量建模与Mplus应用, 基础篇. 重庆市: 重庆大学出版社.
[12] 夏凌翔, 万黎, 宋艳, 杨翼龙(2011). 人际自立与抑郁的关系. 心理学报, 43(10), 1175-1184.
[13] 闫丁, 焦璨(2016). 简版流调中心抑郁量表在老年人中的因子结构. 中国心理卫生杂志, 30(9), 718-720.
[14] 张宝山, 李娟(2012). 流调中心抑郁量表在老年人群中的因素结构. 心理科学, 35(4), 993-998.
[15] 张宝山, 李娟(2011). 简版流调中心抑郁量表在全国成年人群中的信效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 25(7), 506-511.
[16] 章婕, 吴振云, 方格, 李娟, 韩布新, 陈祉妍(2010). 流调中心抑郁量表全国城市常模的建立. 中国心理卫生杂志, 24(2), 139-143.
[17] 张娜, 张英辉, 马梅, 张韬, 邱培媛(2014). 流调中心抑郁量表在农村女性中的因素结构和信效度. 四川大学学报(医学版), 45(5), 827-830.
[18] Shelley, E. T. (2006). 健康心理学(第5版). 北京: 人民卫生出版社.
[19] Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. (2005). Simulation Study on Fit Indices in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Based on Data with Slightly Distorted Simple Structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 41-75.[CrossRef] 
[20] Björgvinsson, T., Kertz, S. J., Bigda-Peyton, J. S., Mccoy, K. L., & Aderka, I. M. (2013). Psychometric Properties of the ces-d-10 in a Psychiatric Sample. Assessment, 20, 429-436.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Cheung, C.-K., & Bagley, C. (1998). Validating an American Scale in Hong Kong: The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 132, 169-186.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Edman, J. L., Danko, G. P., Andrade, N., Mcardle, J. J., Foster, J., & Glipa, J. (1999). Factor Structure of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) among Filipino-American Adolescents. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34, 211-215.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of Fit Indexes to Misspecified Structural or Measurement Model Components: Rationale of Two-Index Strategy Revisited. Structural Equation Modeling a Multidisciplinary Journal, 12, 343-367.[CrossRef] 
[24] Guarnaccia, P. J., Angel, R., & Worobey, J. L. (1989). The Factor Structure of the CES-D in the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: The Influences of Ethnicity, Gender and Language. Social Science & Medicine, 29, 85-94.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Hau, K., Marsh, H., & Wen, Z. (2004). Goodness of Fit Measures in Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Psychology, 39, 513-513.
[26] Huang, S. S., Wang, W. F., & Liao, Y. C. (2015). The Factor Structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) for Depression in Dementia Caregivers. Changhua Journal of Medicine, 13, 195-200.
[27] Jang, Y., Kwag, K. H., & Chiriboga, D. A. (2010). Not Saying I Am Happy Does Not Mean I Am Not: Cultural Influences on Responses to Positive Affect Items in the CES-D. Journals of Gerontology, 65, 684-690.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Johnson, D. R., & Creech, J. C. (1983). Ordinal Measures in Multiple Indicator Models: A Simulation Study of Categorization Error. American Sociological Review, 48, 398-407.[CrossRef] 
[29] Kazarian, S. S., & Taher, D. (2010). Validation of the Arabic Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale in a Lebanese Community Sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 68-73.[CrossRef] 
[30] Liang, J., Van Tran, T., Krause, N., & Markides, K. S. (1989). Generational Differences in the Structure of the CES-D Scale in Mexican Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 44, 110-120.[CrossRef] 
[31] Poulin, C., Hand, D., & Boudreau, B. (2005). Validity of a 12-Item Version of the CES-D Used in the National Longitudinal Study of Children and Youth. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 26, 65-72.
[32] Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.[CrossRef] 
[33] Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C. (1993). The CES-D: Four or Five Factors? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 577-578.[CrossRef] 
[34] Wang, M., Yang, W., & Xiong, G. (2018). Factor Structure and Criterion Validity across the Full Scale and Ten Short Forms of the CES-D among Chinese Adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 30, 1186-1198.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Wang, M., Armour, C., Wu, Y., Ren, F., Zhu, X., & Yao, S. (2013). Factor Structure of the CES-D and Measurement Invariance across Gender in Mainland Chinese Adolescents. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69, 966-979.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Yen, S., Robins, C. J., & Lin, N. (2000). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Depressive Symptom Manifestation: China and the United States. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 68, 993-999.[CrossRef] 
[37] Ying, Y. W., Lee, P. A., Tsai, J. L., Yeh, Y. Y., & Huang, J. S. (2000). The Conception of Depression in Chinese American College Students. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 6, 183-195.[CrossRef] [PubMed]