分类任务中学习策略的识别与解释
Identification and Interpretation of Learning Strategies in Classification
摘要: 从知觉类别学习的视角对学习策略识别与解释的相关方法和技术进行了回顾。从知觉类别学习和被试学习策略的识别与解释视角出发，对二十多年来的主流研究进行梳理和分析。通过对决策界限模型、外显推理模型、程序性学习模型等既往模型应用的情况和存在的不足进行分析，对该领域未来发展手段，即迭代决策界限建模(IDBM)技术的原理和应用进行探索，希望能为推动我国认知心理学和神经心理学实验评估手段的完善提供借鉴。
Abstract: This paper reviews the methods and techniques of identifying and explaining learning strategies from the perspective of perceptual category learning. Based on the summary of the current re-search situation in this field, this paper combs and analyzes the mainstream research in the past 20 years from the perspective of perceptual category learning and the identification and inter-pretation of the learning strategies. By analyzing the application and shortcomings of previous models such as decision-making boundaries model, explicit reasoning model and process learning model, this paper explores the principle and application of IDBM model. This study aims to provide references for the improvement of experimental evaluation methods of cognitive psychology and neuropsychology in China through the study of the identification and interpretation techniques of learning strategies based on perceptual category learning.
文章引用：赖奕均 (2019). 分类任务中学习策略的识别与解释. 心理学进展, 9(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.91006

参考文献

[1] Ashby, F. G. (1992b). Multivariate Probability Distributions. In F. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[2] Ashby, F. G., & Gott, R. E.(1988). Decision Rules in the Perception and Categorization of Multidimensional Stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 33-53.[CrossRef] 
[3] Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human Category Learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 149-178.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Ashby, F. G., & Soto, F. A. (2015). Multidimensional Signal Detection Theory. In J. Busemeyer, J. Townsend, Z. Wang, & A. Eidels (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
[5] Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A Neuropsychological Theory of Multiple Systems in Category Learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442-481.[CrossRef] 
[6] Ashby, F. G., Ell, S. W., & Waldron, E. M. (2003). Procedural Learning in Perceptual Categorization. Mem Cognit, 31, 1114-1125.[CrossRef] 
[7] Ashby, F.G., & Lee, W.W. (1991). Predicting Similarity and Categorization from Identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 150-172.[CrossRef] 
[8] Ashby, F.G., & Townsend, J.T. (1986). Varieties of Perceptual Independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.[CrossRef] 
[9] Couchman, J. J., Coutinho, M. V. C., & Smith, J. D. (2010). Rules and Resemblance: Their Changing Balance in the Category Learning of Humans (Homo Sapiens) and Monkeys (Macacamulatta). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 172-183.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Donkin, C. et al. (2015). Identifying Strategy Use in Category Learning Tasks: A Case for More Diagnostic Data and Models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 933-948.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Ell, S. W., & Ashby, F. G. (2006). The Effects of Category Overlap on Information-Integration and Rule-Based Category Learning. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, 1013-1026.[CrossRef] 
[12] Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and Exemplars in Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107-140.[CrossRef] 
[13] Filoteo, J. V., & Maddox, W. T. (2014). Procedural-Based Category Learning in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: Impact of Category Number and Category Continuity. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, Article 14.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Griffiths, O., Hayes, B. K., & Newell, B. R. (2012). Feature-Based versus Category-Based Induction with Uncertain Categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition, 38, 576.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Haider, H., & Frensch, P. A. (1996). The Role of Information Reduction in Skill Acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 304-337.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Hélie, S. (2006). An Introduction to Model Selection. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 2, 1-10.
[17] Hélie, S., Turner, B. O., Crossley, M. J., Ell, S. W., & Ashby, F. G. (2016). Trial-by-Trial Identification of Categorization Strategy Using Iterative Decision Boundmodeling. Behavior Re-search Methods, 49, 1146-1162.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Kalish, M. L., Lewandowsky, S., & Davies, M. (2005). Error Driven Knowledge Restructuring in Categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 846-861.
[19] Konishi, S. et al. (1999). Common Inhibitory Mechanism in Human Inferior Prefrontal Cortex Revealed by Event-Related Functional MRI. Brain, 122, 981-991.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an Instance Theory of Automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.[CrossRef] 
[21] Love, B. C., & Medin, D. L. (1998). SUSTAIN: A Model of Human Category Learning. In C. Rich, & J. Mostow (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 671-676). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[22] Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1993). Comparing Decision Bound and Exemplar Models of Categorization. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 49-70.[CrossRef] 
[23] Maddox, W. T., Ashby, F. G., & Waldron, E. M. (2002). Multiple Attention Systems in Perceptual Categorization. Memory and Cognition, 30, 325-339.[CrossRef] 
[24] Natal, S. D. C., Mclaren, I. P. L., & Livesey, E. J. (2013). Generalization of Feature- and Rule-Based Learning in the Categorization of Dimensional Stimuli: Evidence for Dual Processes under Cognitive Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 39, 140-151.
[25] Neapolitan, R. (2004). Learning Bayesian Networks. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[26] Smith, J. D., Beran, M. J., Crossley, M. J., Boomer, J., & Ashby, F. G. (2010). Implicit and Explicit Category Learning by Macaques (Macacamulatta) and Humans (Homo Sapiens). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 54-65.
[27] Spiering, B. J., & Ashby, F. G. (2008). Initial Training with Difficult Items Facilitates Information Integration, But Not Rule-Based Category Learning. Psychological Science, 19, 1169-1177.[CrossRef] [PubMed]