土地合作社制度下的收益分配主体间演化博弈分析
The Evolutionary Game Analysis of Enterprise’s Income Distribution in Land Joint-Stock Cooperative System Reform
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2019.81025, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 陈美招:广东外语外贸大学,社会与公共管理学院,广东 广州;郑荣宝, 张雅琪:广东工业大学,管理学院,广东 广州
关键词: 土地股份合作收益分配利益主体演化博弈Land Joint Stock Cooperation Income Distribution Stakeholders Evolutionary Game Theory
摘要: 土地股份合作制改革从根本上转变农村集体土地现有的经营方式,提高了村民收入,但是由此引发的土地收益分配不公平问题却日益严重。本文以广州市天河区龙洞村为例,基于复制者动态模型建立了政府、经济联社及村民之间的收益矩阵,并采用雅格比迭代法对该模型均衡点的稳定性进行演化博弈分析。结果表明:当三群体收益矩阵方程的均衡点到达[1,0,0]时,系统方程处于稳定状态,政府、经济联社及村民所做出的策略组合为{监管,不可持续经营,保持缄默},从该策略组合中可以看出,政府虽有采取监管措施,却容易导致经济联社经营不规范、村民维权意识淡薄等问题。
Abstract: The land joint-stock cooperative system reform can change the existing business model of rural collective land, and rise peasants’ income, however, the resulting problem of inequalities of land revenue distribution is increasingly more serious. Taking Longdong village in Tianhe district of Guangzhou city as an example, this paper builds a pay off matrix model among government, eco-nomic association and villagers based on replicated dynamic model, and applies the Jacobi itera-tion method to analyze the stability of the equilibrium point. Model results show that the system of equations is in a stable state when equilibrium pay off matrix equation of the three groups reaches [1,0,0]. Thus, the government, economic association and villagers make decision to the strategy combination {regulation, unsustainable management, silence}. We find that although government takes regulation, the economic association lacks of standard operation. Moreover, the villagers are often short of protection of rights when they face damages on rights and interests.
文章引用:陈美招, 郑荣宝, 张雅琪. 土地合作社制度下的收益分配主体间演化博弈分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2019, 8(1): 167-174. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2019.81025

参考文献

[1] Peter, D. (1964) Land Tenure, Income Distribution and Productivity Interactions. Land Economics, 40, 247-254.
[2] Berry, R.A. (1973) Land Distribution, Income Distribution, and the Productive Efficiency of Colombian Agriculture. Food Research Institute Studies, 12, 199-233.
[3] 亨利•乔治. 进步与贫困[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1995: 347.
[4] Jorge, A. and Henry, W. (2013) Agrarian Income Distribution, Land Ownership Systems, and Economic Performance: Settler Economies during the First Globalization. Document on Line 30, 1-60.
[5] 朱木斌. 孙中山的平均地权理论及其现代启示[J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2011(6): 45-49.
[6] 李元. 中国城市化进程中的征地制度改革[J]. 中国土地, 2005(12): 4-6.
[7] 周诚. 关于我国农地转非自然增值分配理论的新思考[J]. 农业经济问题, 2006(12): 4-7.
[8] 郭爱请, 尚国琲. 城市土地收益分配改革思路探讨[J]. 商业时代, 2010(7): 78-79.
[9] 李梅. 城镇土地收益分配机制理论研究[J]. 经济问题, 2009, 361(9): 46-47.
[10] 姜和忠, 徐卫星. 农地非农化配置中的收益分配问题: 基于可持续发展理论的公平原则[J]. 中国土地科学, 2011, 25(6): 65-69.
[11] 关江华, 黄朝禧. 农村宅基地流转利益主体博弈研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2013(3): 30-35.
[12] 袁媛. 农村土地产权流转制度利益主体博弈及创新路径[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 40(4): 64-68.
[13] Sam, M. (2014) Land Ownership Patterns and Income Inequality in Southern Africa. Background Paper Prepared for World Economic and Social Survey, 60.
[14] 王宏娟, 石敏俊, 谌丽. 基于利益主体视角的农村集体建设用地流转研究——以北京市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(11): 2263-2272.
[15] Friedman, D. (1991) Evolutionary Games in Economics. Econometrica, 59, 637-666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Hirshleifer, J. (1987) Evolutionary Models in Economics and Law: Cooperation versus Conflict Strategies. UCLA Economics Working Papers 170.