镇江市产业结构与碳排放耦合协调发展分析
Analysis on the Coordinated Development of Industrial Structure and Carbon Emission in Zhenjiang City
摘要: 在低碳经济发展背景下,本文以全国低碳试点城市——镇江市为研究对象,首先从人均碳排放量、碳排放密度、碳排放强度和碳生产力四个方面综合衡量碳排放水平;然后对镇江市产业结构高级度、合理度、集中度进行计算;接着分别对镇江市的碳排放水平和产业结构的高级度、合理度、集中度进行耦合协调分析。结论如下:1) 碳排放水平及其各指标地区差异明显,碳排放水平由高到低依次是市辖区、句容市、丹阳市、扬中市。2) 产业结构分布在各地区之间也表现出了巨大的差异性,三个维度相对高水平的是丹阳市,其次是扬中市、市辖区、句容市。3) 镇江市各地区整体耦合协调度偏低,碳排放水平与产业结构演化没有协调发展,且空间呈现很大的不均衡态势。最后,本文对镇江市如何实现产业结构调整与碳排放的高质量耦合协调发展提出政策建议。
Abstract: In the context of low-carbon economy development, this paper takes Zhenjiang City, a low-carbon pilot city in China, as the research object. Firstly, it comprehensively measures carbon emission levels from four aspects: per capita carbon emissions, carbon emission density, carbon emission intensity and carbon productivity. The high-level, rationality and concentration of industrial structure in Zhenjiang City were calculated. Then, the carbon emission level of Zhenjiang City and the advanced degree, rationality and concentration of industrial structure were analyzed and co-ordinated. The conclusions are as follows: 1) The carbon emission level and its various indicators are significantly different. The order of carbon emission from high to low is the municipal district, Jurong City, Danyang City and Yangzhong City. 2) The distribution of industrial structure has also shown great differences among different regions. The three levels are relatively high in Danyang City, followed by Yangzhong City, Municipal District and Jurong City. 3) The overall coupling coor-dination degree of Zhenjiang City is low, the carbon emission level and the industrial structure evolution are not coordinated, and the space presents a large imbalance. Finally, this paper pro-poses policy recommendations on how Zhenjiang City can achieve high-quality coupling and coor-dinated development of industrial structure adjustment and carbon emissions.
文章引用:刘志荣, 卢娜, 邱乐涵, 吴鑫淼, 周凯. 镇江市产业结构与碳排放耦合协调发展分析[J]. 可持续发展, 2019, 9(3): 412-420. https://doi.org/10.12677/SD.2019.93050

参考文献

[1] 谢晓晶. 中国碳排放与产业结构关联研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北方工业大学, 2013.
[2] 刘凤朝, 孙玉涛. 技术创新、产业结构调整对能源消费影响的实证分析[J]. 中国人口•资源与环境, 2008, 18(3): 108-113.
[3] 王修华, 王翔. 产业结构升级与低碳经济发展的耦合研究[J]. 软科学, 2012, 26(3): 29-32.
[4] 王洋帅, 童纪新. 江苏省产业结构升级、城市化与碳排放的动态关系——基于VAR模型的实证研究[J]. 河南科学, 2016, 34(5): 798-804.
[5] 徐胜, 司登奎. 结构转型、能源效率对低碳经济的异质性影响——基于省际数据的面板协整分析[J]. 软科学, 2014, 28(7): 6-10+39.
[6] 江洪, 赵宝福. 碳排放约束下能源效率与产业结构解构、空间分布及耦合分析[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(1): 152-162.
[7] 郑少智, 陈志辉. 产业结构高级化与经济增长关系实证研究——基于全国、广东省及广州市数据的对比分析[J]. 产经评论, 2011(3): 55-60.
[8] 干春晖, 郑若谷, 余典范. 中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2011, 46(5): 4-16+31.
[9] 关伟, 许淑婷. 辽宁省能源效率与产业结构的空间特征及耦合关系[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(4): 520-530.
[10] 马丽, 金凤君, 刘毅. 中国经济与环境污染耦合度格局及工业结构解析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(10): 1299-1307.
[11] 单豪杰. 中国资本存量K的再估算: 1952-2006年[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2008, 25(10): 17-31.