动画呈现速度对心理学实验微课学习效果的眼动研究
An Eye Movement Study of the Effect of Animation Presentation Speed on the Learning Effect of Psychological Experimental Microlesson
摘要: 以往研究关于多媒体呈现速度对于学习效果和眼动指标的影响模棱两可。所以本研究采用实验方法，利用tobii tx300，以心理学中的视崖实验的微课作为实验材料，探究动画呈现速度对学习效果的影响。实验研究发现，微课速度对知识识记没有影响，但对知识的理解具有影响，相比于快速、中速呈现速度，慢速呈现下的迁移测验的学习效果最好；微课不同播放速度下学习者的眼动指标有差异，不影响兴趣区的搜索效率和注意转移，但影响兴趣区的信息提取。
Abstract: Previous studies have been ambiguous about the impact of animation speed on learning outcomes and eye movement indicators. Therefore, this study adopts the experimental method, uses tobii tx300, and the micro-course of the visual cliff experiment in psychology as the experimental material, to explore the influence of the animation rendering speed on the learning effect. The experimental research found that the speed of micro-class has no influence on knowledge and knowledge, but it has an influence on the understanding of knowledge. Compared with the fast and medium-speed rendering speed, the learning effect of the migration test under slow presentation is the best. There are differences in the eye movement indicators of the learners, which do not affect the search efficiency and attention shift of the interest area, but affect the information extraction of the interest area.
文章引用：徐艳 (2019). 动画呈现速度对心理学实验微课学习效果的眼动研究. 心理学进展, 9(7), 1324-1331. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.97163

参考文献

[1] 陈曦(2013). 颜色编码对多媒体课件中图文信息加工的影响研究. 硕士论文. 天津: 天津师范大学.
[2] 代鑫(2013). 儿童教育游戏界面知识内容呈现区设计的实验研究. 硕士论文. 南京: 南京师范大学.
[3] 段朝辉, 颜志强, 王福兴, 周宗奎(2013). 动画呈现速度对多媒体学习效果影响的眼动研究. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 46-53.
[4] 胡卫星(2012). 动画情境下多媒体学习的实验研究. 博士论文. 大连: 辽宁师范大学.
[5] 刘儒德, 赵妍, 柴松针, 徐娟(2007). 多媒体学习的影响因素. 中国电化教育, (10), 1-3.
[6] 皮忠玲(2014). 视频播客呈现方式对学习效果的影响及其机制的眼动研究. 硕士论文. 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[7] 钱莹莹, 王福兴, 段朝辉, 周宗奎(2016). 动画速度和学习者经验对多媒体学习的影响. 心理发展与教育, 32(2), 191-197.
[8] 陶云, 申继亮(2003). 高二学生阅读插图课文的即时加工研究. 心理发展与教育, 18(2), 43-46.
[9] 闫志明, 郭喜莲, 王睿(2018). 多媒体学习研究中眼动指标述评. 现代教育技术, (5), 6.
[10] 郑玉玮, 王亚兰, 崔磊(2016). 眼动追踪技术在多媒体学习中的应用: 2005-2015 年相关研究的综述. 电化教育研究, 37(4), 68-76.
[11] Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Making Instructional Animations More Effective: A Cognitive Load Approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 21, 695-700.[CrossRef] 
[12] Canham, M. S., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of Knowledge and Display Design on Comprehension of Complex Graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20, 155-166.[CrossRef] 
[13] De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2011). Attention Cueing in an Instructional Animation: The Role of Presentation Speed. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 41-45.[CrossRef] 
[14] Fischer, S., & Schwan, S. (2010). Comprehending Animations: Effects of Spatial Cueing versus Temporal Scaling. Learning and Instruction, 20, 465-475.[CrossRef] 
[15] Fischer, S., Lowe, R. K., & Schwan, S. (2008). Effects of Presentation Speed of a Dynamic Visualization on the Understanding of a Mechanical System. Applied Cognitive Psy-chology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22, 1126-1141.[CrossRef] 
[16] Malbran, M. D. C. (2007). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologia en Educacion y Educacion en Tecnologia, No. 2, 92.
[17] Manor, B. R., & Gordon, E. (2003). Defining the Temporal Threshold for Ocular Fixation in Free-Viewing Visual Cognitive Tasks. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 128, 85-93.[CrossRef] 
[18] Mayer, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[CrossRef] 
[19] Meyer, K., Rasch, T., & Schnotz, W. (2010). Effects of Animation’s Speed of Presentation on Perceptual Processing and Learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 136-145.[CrossRef]