基于CFD数据库及NMF的流场重构成像方法
Flow Field Reconstruction Tomography Method Based on CFD Database and NMF
DOI: 10.12677/CSA.2019.99199, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 康 毅*:华北电力大学(北京)能源动力与机械工程学院,北京
关键词: 过程层析成像流场重构CFD数据库非负矩阵分解数据降维Process Tomography Flow Field Reconstruction CFD Database NMF Data Dimension Reduction
摘要: 文章提出了一种基于计算流体动力学(CFD)和非负矩阵因子分解(NMF)的新型过程层析成像(PT)方法,用于重构流场。通过CFD模拟建立CFD样本数据库,并利用NMF从样本数据库提取样本基矩阵。然后,利用基矩阵可通过少量传感器测量数据逆解得到样本矩阵,从而减少重构所需的采样点,实现流场的快速降维重构。由重构结果可知,该方法可以精确地重构流场,尤其是不存在较大数量级差异的过程参数;与其他重构方法相比,本方法避免了多相流检测过程中复杂敏感场的计算,而且相较于纯CFD模拟方法和插值方法,重构所需的时间大幅缩减。
Abstract: This paper proposes a new process tomography (PT) method based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) for reconstructing flow fields. The CFD sample database is established by CFD simulation, and the sample base matrix is extracted from the sample database by using NMF. Then, based on the basis matrix, the sample matrix can be obtained by inversely solving from a small amount of sensor measurement data, thereby reducing the sampling points required for reconstruction and realizing rapid dimensional reconstruction of the flow field. It can be seen from the reconstruction results that the method can accurately reconstruct the flow field, especially the process parameters without large order of magnitude difference; compared with other multi-phase flow detection methods, the method avoids the complex calculations of sensitive field in the multi-phase flow detection process. Meanwhile, compared to simple CFD simulation methods and interpolation methods, the time required for reconstruction is greatly reduced.
文章引用:康毅. 基于CFD数据库及NMF的流场重构成像方法[J]. 计算机科学与应用, 2019, 9(9): 1779-1791. https://doi.org/10.12677/CSA.2019.99199

参考文献

[1] 邢天阳. 多相流检测研究进展[J]. 科技资讯, 2017, 15(27): 113-114.
[2] 马平, 周晓宁, 田沛. 过程层析成像技术的发展及应用[J]. 化工自动化及仪表, 2009, 36(1): 1-5.
[3] 史志才, 等. 电容层析成象技术在两相流流型辨识中的应用[J]. 自动化仪表, 2000(8): 17-19.
[4] 徐苓安. 多相流检测技术进展: 关于过程层析成像技术的评述[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1996: 7-11.
[5] Tallon, S.J. and Davies, C.E. (2000) The Effect of Pipeline Location on Acoustic Measurement of Gas Solid Pipeline Flow. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 11, 165-169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 董峰, 等. 过程层析成像技术综述[J]. 仪器仪表用户, 2001, 8(1): 6-11.
[7] 杨莉松, 王桂英, 徐至展. 光学层析成像技术的发展现状[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 1997, 34(8): 5-7.
[8] Uchiyama, H., Nakajima, M. and Yuta, S. (1985) Measurement of Flame Temperature Distribution by IR Emission Computed Tomography. Applied Optics, 24, 4111-4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Hertzhm, F. (1988) Emission Tomography of Flame Radicals. Optics Letters, 13, 351-353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 阎春生, 曾楠. 光学层析成像技术的研究动态[J]. 激光杂志, 2001, 22(5): 5-7.
[11] York, T.A. (2001) Status of Electrical Tomography Industrial Applications. Journal of Electronic Im-aging, 10, 608-619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Holder, D. (2004) Techniques in Electrical Impedance Tomography (Series in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering).
[13] Dickin, F. and Wan, M. (1996) Electrical Resistance Tomography for Process Applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 7, 247-260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Huang, S.M., Plaskowski, A.B., Xie, C.G. and Beck, M.S. (1988) Capacitance-Based Tomographic Flow Imaging System. Electronics Letters, 24, 418-419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 郝建娜. 电磁层析成像与检测技术逆问题的研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 天津: 天津大学, 2013.
[16] Qin, L., Liu, S. and Kang, Y. (2018) Wind Velocity Distribution Reconstruction Us-ing CFD Database with Tucker Decomposition and Sensor Measurement. Energy, 167, 1236-1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Lee, D.D. and Seung, H.S. (1999) Learning the Parts of Objects by Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. Nature, 401, 788-791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Lee, D.D. and Seung, H.S. (2001) Algorithms for Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13: Proceedings of the 2000 Conference, MIT Press, Cambridge, 556-562.