认同•愿景•效能:移动游戏用户参与意向影响因素研究
Identification•Vision•Efficacy: A Study on the Influencing Factors of Mobile Game User Intention to Participate
摘要: 随着移动设备的普及和移动通讯技术的发展,移动游戏在社会生活中的渗透率越来越高,如何进一步激发用户参与意向成为移动游戏产品竞争致胜的关键。基于用户研究视角,本研究在整合社会资本理论与社会认知理论的基础上,结合问卷调查与数据分析,探讨了移动游戏用户的参与意向的相关影响因素。研究发现,社会资本理论中的认同、共同愿景与社会认知理论中的自我效能对移动游戏用户参与意向存在正向显著的影响;移动游戏用户的信任感显著影响认同感,自我效能感显著影响参与游戏的结果期望。
Abstract: With the popularity of mobile devices and the development of mobile communication technology, the penetration rate of mobile games in social life is getting higher and higher. How to further stimulate user participation intentions has become the key to winning mobile game products. Based on the perspective of user research, based on the integration of social capital theory and so-cial cognitive theory, this study combines questionnaire surveys and data analysis to explore the relevant influencing factors of mobile game users’ participation intentions. The study found that social capital theory’s identity, shared vision, and self-efficacy in social cognition theory had a positive and significant impact on mobile game user participation intentions; mobile game users’ trust significantly affected identity and self-efficacy significantly affected the outcome expectations of participating in the game.
文章引用:付强. 认同•愿景•效能:移动游戏用户参与意向影响因素研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2020, 9(2): 121-130. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2020.92021

参考文献

[1] 艾瑞咨询. 2017年移动游戏行业研究报告[EB/OL]. http://report.iresearch.cn/report/201708/3043.shtml, 2017-08.
[2] Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998) Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 242-266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 林盈廷. 社交网路游戏对使用者社会网络及线上人际互动之影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 台北: 交通大学, 2011: 79.
[4] Bandura, A. (1989) Social Cognitive Theory. In: Vasta, R., Ed., Annals of Child Development. Vol. 6. Six Theories of Child Development, JAI Press, Greenwich, 1-60.
[5] 赵忠平. 移动游戏用户使用意愿影响因素研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京邮电大学, 2012.
[6] 张荣华. 知识问答社区用户的知识共享意愿研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京邮电大学, 2008.
[7] Nysveen, H., Thorbjornsen, H., et al. (2005) Mobilizing the Brand: The Effects of Mobile Services on Brand Relationships and Main Channel Use. Journal of Services Research, 7, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Bandura, A. (1986) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York, NY, 21.
[9] Lawler, E.J. and Yoon, J. (1996) Commitment in Exchange Relations: Test of a Theory of Relations Cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61, 89-108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Bandura, A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall Inc., Hoboken.
[11] 徐云杰. 社会调查研究与数据分析——从立题到发表[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2011.
[12] Bagozzi, R.P. and Dholakia, U.M. (2002) Intentional Social Action in Virtual Communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16, 2-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 荣泰生. AMOS与研究方法[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010: 131-132.
[14] 钟智锦. 使用与满足: 网络游戏动机及其对游戏行为的影响[J]. 国际新闻界, 2010(3): 12-13.
[15] McPherson, S.L. and Cook, J.M. (2001) Birds of a Feather. Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef