P2P网络信贷第三方保险费率定价研究——基于风险中性原理
Research on P2P Online Credit Third-Party Insurance Rate Pricing—Based on the Risk-Neutral Principle
DOI: 10.12677/FIN.2020.102008, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 芦中坤, 敬志勇：上海师范大学，上海
关键词: P2P网贷风险准备金；Merton模型；风险中性原理；P2P Network Credit Risk Reserve； Merton Model； Risk Neutral Principle
摘要: 本文以2015年央行会同十部委出台的《关于促进互联网金融建行发展的指导意见》(以下简称意见)为背景，实证分析了我国现有的P2P网贷行业分析趋势，并利用Merton期权定价模型并结合风险中性原则建立了P2P网络信贷风险准备金定价模型。从实证结果来看，P2P跑路风险较政策未出台前已经显著降低，P2P网贷行业逐步走向良性发展的道路，在保护了投资者利益的同时扩展了我国金融多样化、多元化的发展。在保持良好发展势头的同时，不能忽略P2P网贷平台可能产生的信贷风险，本文结合当前国际金融背景给出了防范风险的建议。
Abstract: This article takes the Guiding Opinions on Promoting the Development of Internet Financial Construction Bank (hereinafter referred to as the Opinion) issued by the Central Bank in conjunction with ten ministries and commissions in 2015 as an empirical analysis of China's existing P2P online loan industry analysis trend, and uses Merton option pricing models and based on the principle of risk neutrality, a P2P network credit risk reserve pricing model was established. From the empirical results, the risk of P2P running has been significantly lower than that before the policy was introduced. The P2P online lending industry is gradually moving towards a benign development path, which expanded the diversification and diversification of China's financial resources while protecting the interests of investors. While maintaining a good momentum of development, we cannot ignore the credit risk that may arise from the P2P online lending platform. This paper gives recommendations on risk prevention in light of the current international financial background.
文章引用：芦中坤, 敬志勇. P2P网络信贷第三方保险费率定价研究——基于风险中性原理[J]. 金融, 2020, 10(2): 68-76. https://doi.org/10.12677/FIN.2020.102008

参考文献

[1] 钱瑾. P2P平台风险准备金的法律问题研究[J]. 西南金融, 2016(8): 48-52.
[2] 张江涛. P2P网贷去担保化与信用风险防范[J]. 中国物价, 2016(8): 54-56.
[3] 彭宁. P2P网络借贷平台担保问题研究[J]. 法制与社会, 2016(9): 101-102.
[4] 雷舰. 我国P2P网贷行业发展现状、问题及监管对策[J]. 国际金融, 2014(8): 71-76.
[5] 邓德宏. 网络借贷P2P监管研究[J]. 法制与经济, 2016(10): 123-124.
[6] 宋建波, 王德宏. P2P网贷风险准备金的差异化计提研究[J]. 国际商务财会, 2018(2): 8-14.
[7] 徐策. 我国P2P的风险及财务规范机制[J]. 金融会计, 2014(3): 26-30.
[8] 彭劲松. KPMG风险中性模型在信托公司风险管理中的运用探索[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2014(12): 76-79.
[9] 陈道平. 风险中性分析及其在衍生证券定价中的应用[J]. 重庆三峡学院学报, 2006, 22(3): 36-38.
[10] 贺强, 王建军. 风险中性定价下的权证定价模型[J]. 西安邮电学院学报, 2006, 11(2): 80-82+98.
[11] 张曙光, 陈玲. 两种路径依赖重置期权的设计与定价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2006, 15(6): 91-94.
[12] 魏正红, 张术林. 中国证券市场可预测性实证分析[J]. 中国统计, 2007(8): 55-56.
[13] 吴鑫育, 周海林, 李心丹. 波动率风险溢价: 基于香港权证市场的实证[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(2): 133-137.
[14] 曾长兴. 同质信念、异质信念与市场中性策略实证研究[J]. 南方金融, 2012(4): 64-67+33.
[15] Cox, J.C. and Ross, S.A. (1976) The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 145-166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Taylor, S.J. (1986) Modelling Financial Time Series. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
[17] Robert, C. (1974) On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates. Journal of Finance, 29, 449-470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] 孟令松, 范雨佳, 喻旭兰. P2P网络信贷保险风险准备金定价研究——基于风险中性原则[J]. 经济体制改革, 2016(6): 150-155.

为你推荐