成渝城市群综合与多维发展测度研究
A Study on the Comprehensive and Multi-Dimensional Development Measure of Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration
摘要: 区域发展测度研究是定量评价区域发展水平及差异重要方法。本文以成渝城市群内四川地级市和重庆区县为研究单元,从经济发展水平、城镇化水平、居民生活水平、交通设施水平、公共福祉6个维度选择15个指标,构建了成渝城市群区域发展综合评价指标体系。采用序排列多边形面积法,对成渝城市群区域发展水平进行多维度综合测度评价,在此基础上,引入协调度模型,对多维系统内部协调性进行定量分析。研究结果表明:成渝城市群综合测度得分偏度系数为4.34,研究区区域发展水平在存在显著差异,在空间格局上呈现出以成都市和重庆主城为核心,川北地区的宜宾市和川南地区的绵阳、德阳、南充为次中心的空间发展格局。在其经济发展水平维度上,测度得分偏度系数为3.92,说明研究区区域经济发展程度具有显著差异;城镇化水平和居民生活水平维度得分偏度系数分别为1.26和1.92,说明研究区内的城镇化水平和居民生活水平差异不明显。就协调度而言,成渝城市群总体水平较低,有濒临失调类型1个、轻度失调类型5个、中度失调类型有14个、重度失调类型10个、极度失调类型6个。成都市和重庆主城分别属于濒临失调和轻度失调,协调度水平有待提高。
Abstract: Regional development measurement research is an important way to quantitatively evaluate regional development level and difference. This paper uses Sichuan city and Chongqing County in Chengdu Chongqing city group as the research unit, it establishes an evaluation index system of comprehensive development level in Chengdu Chongqing City agglomeration, 15 indicators are selected from 6 dimensions: economic development level, urbanization level, residents’ living standard, transportation facilities level and public welfare. This paper uses the method of ordered polygon area to measure the regional development level of Chengdu Chongqing urban agglomeration. Based on that, the coordination degree model is introduced to quantitatively analyze the internal coordination of multi-dimensional urban system. The research results show that the Chengdu Chongqing city comprehensive evaluation score skewness coefficient is 4.34, there is a significant difference in the regional development level of the study area, the spatial pattern shows in Chengdu city and Chongqing city as the core area of Yibin City, North and South region of Mianyang, Deyang, Nanchong as the center of the spatial development pattern. The level of economic development dimension, measure score skewness coefficient is 3.92, indicating the regional economic development degree of the study area has significant difference; the level of urbanization and residents’ living level scores of skewness coefficient were 1.26 and 1.92, indicating the level of urbanization in the area of study and living conditions were not significantly different. In terms of coordination degree, the overall level of Chengdu Chongqing urban agglomeration is relatively low, which is 1 type of on the verge of disorder, 5 types of mild disorders, 14 types of moderate disorders, 10 types of serious disorders, and 6 types of extreme disorders. The main cities of Chengdu and Chongqing belong to the verge of disorder and mild disorder respectively, and the level of coordination needs to be improved.
文章引用:秦悦, 张学儒, 龙秋月. 成渝城市群综合与多维发展测度研究[J]. 可持续发展, 2020, 10(2): 242-251. https://doi.org/10.12677/SD.2020.102030

参考文献

[1] 陆大道. 中国区域发展的新因素与新格局[J]. 地理研究, 2003, 22(3): 261-271.
[2] 杨振, 江琪, 刘会敏, 等. 中国农村居民多维贫困测度与空间格局[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(12): 148-153.
[3] 黄松, 李燕林, 戴平娟. 智慧旅游城市旅游竞争力评价[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(2): 242-255.
[4] 樊杰, 郭锐. 面向“十三五”创新区域治理体系的若干重点问题[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(1): 1-6.
[5] 张建伟, 苗长虹, 姜海宁. 中国GDP偏离度的空间计量经济分析[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(5): 515-520.
[6] 潘竟虎. 中国地级及以上城市GDP含金量时空分异格局[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(12): 1502-1510.
[7] 杜茂华, 杨刚. 基于锡尔系数和基尼系数法的重庆城乡发展差异分析[J]. 经济地理, 2010, 30(5): 773-777.
[8] 芦惠, 欧向军, 李想, 等. 中国区域经济差异与极化的时空分析[J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(6): 15-21.
[9] Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 孙威, 董冠鹏. 基于DEA模型的中国资源型城市效率及其变化[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(12): 2155-2165.
[11] 范建双, 虞晓芬, 张利花. 中国区域城镇化综合效率测度及其动力因子分析[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(9): 1077-1085.
[12] 姜彩楼, 徐康宁, 朱琴. 中国高新区绩效的时空演化及贸易溢出效应研究[J]. 经济地理, 2012, 32(2): 14-19.
[13] Fukuda-Parr, S., Lawson-Remer, T. and Randolph, S. (2009) An Index of Economic and Social Rights Fulfillment: Concept and Methodology. Journal of Human Rights, 8, 195-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Randolph, S., Fukuda-Parr, S. and Lawson-Remer, T. (2009) Economic and Social Rights Fulfillment Index: Country Scores and Rankings. Economic Rights Working Papers. Journal of Human Rights, 9, 230-261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Deutsch, J. and Silber, J. (2005) Measuring Multidimensional Poverty: An Empirical Comparison of Various Approaches. Review of Income & Wealth, 51, 145-174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 徐勇, 段健, 徐小任. 区域多维发展综合测度方法及应用[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(12): 2129-2140.
[17] 翁钢民, 李凌雁. 中国旅游与文化产业融合发展的耦合协调度及空间相关分析[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(1): 178-185.
[18] 张立生. 基于市级尺度的中国城乡协调发展空间演化[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(8): 1165-1171.
[19] 刘兆德, 刘聪, 刘强, 等. 中国地级及以上城市区域综合发展水平及其类型[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(3): 25-31.
[20] 李影影, 黄琪, 曹卫东. 泛长三角地区城市效益与规模协调性测度[J]. 人文地理, 2017, 32(3): 124-130.
[21] 江孝君, 杨青山, 张郁, 等. 中国经济社会协调发展水平空间分异特征[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(8): 14-26.
[22] 刘艳华, 徐勇. 中国农村多维贫困地理识别及类型划分[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(6): 993-1007.
[23] 徐小任, 徐勇. 中国居民住房内生活设施配置及区域差异[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(2): 173-183.
[24] 耿焕侠, 张小林. 基于熵值法的江苏省经济增长质量定量分析[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2014, 30(1): 81-85.
[25] 欧向军, 甄峰, 秦永东, 等. 区域城市化水平综合测度及其理想动力分析——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(5): 993-1002.
[26] 汤铃, 李建平, 余乐安, 等. 基于距离协调度模型的系统协调发展定量评价方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(4): 594-602.
[27] 尹海伟, 孔繁花. 山东省各市经济环境协调度分析[J]. 人文地理, 2005, 20(2): 30-33.
[28] 杨剩富, 胡守庚, 叶菁, 等. 中部地区新型城镇化发展协调度时空变化及形成机制[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(11): 23-29.
[29] 李裕瑞, 王婧, 刘彦随, 等. 中国“四化”协调发展的区域格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(2): 199-212.
[30] 程明洋, 刘彦随, 蒋宁. 黄淮海地区乡村人–地–业协调发展格局与机制[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1576-1589.