小兴安岭阔叶红松林土壤动物对氮沉降的响应
Response of Soil Animals to Nitrogen Deposition in Broad-Leaved Korean Pine Forest in the Xiaoxing’an Mountains
摘要: 我国大气氮沉降呈逐年增加的趋势,已对生态系统结构和功能产生了显著影响。为研究氮沉降下小兴安岭阔叶红松林对土壤动物群落结构的影响,在丰林国家自然保护区内开展了人工模拟氮沉降试验,从2010年开始,于每年生长季(5月~9月)在选定的试验样地内进行施氮(NH4NO3),分别设置了对照CK (0 g N m−2a−1)、低氮LN (2.5 g N m−2a−1)、中氮MN (5 g N m−2a−1)、高氮HN (7.5 g N m-2 a-1)等4个不同梯度处理。研究结果表明:1) 共捕获土壤动物8769只,计45类,隶属于3门11纲25目。其中优势类群为甲螨亚目、摇蚊幼科、等节跳科,共占总个体数的68.13%。2) 施氮处理下类群数均发生减少;0~10 cm土层土壤动物个体数在HN达到最大值;10~20 cm土层土壤动物个体数在CK时最高;但差异均不显著。3) 土壤动物的季节动态表现:9月个体总数最高,5月类群总数最高。差异显著。4) 土壤动物的垂直特征表现:个体数与类群数呈现出明显表聚性特征。5) 土壤动物群落特征整体均与土壤pH、NO 3-N有极显著正相关。
Abstract: Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in China is increasing every year, which has brought significant effects on the structure and function of ecosystems. An artificially simulated nitrogen deposition experiment was carried out in Fenglin National Nature Reserve to study the effect of broad-leaved Korean pine forest on soil biological community structure in the Xiaoxin’an Mountains under nitrogen deposition. Since 2010, nitrogen application (NH4NO3) has been performed in selected test plots in the growing season (May-September) each year, and four different gradients have been set: CK (0 gN−2m−1), low nitrogen LN (2.5 gN−2m−1), middle nitrogen MN (5 gN−2m−1), high nitrogen HN (7.5 gN−2m−1), for comparison experiment. The results showed that: 1) A total of 8769 soil animals were captured, of which 45 species were in total, belonging to 3 phylum, 11 classes and 25 orders. Among them, the dominant groups are Oribatida, Chironomidae, Isotomidae, accounting for 68.13% of the total number of individuals. 2) After nitrogen treatment, the number of groups all decreased; the number of individual soil animals in the soil layer at 0 to 10 cm reached the maximum at HN; the number of individual soil animals in the soil layer at 10 to 20 cm was highest at CK; but all these differences are not significant. 3) Seasonal dynamics of soil animals: in September, the total number of individuals is the highest; in May, the total number of groups is the highest. The difference is significant. 4) Vertical characteristics and performance of soil animals: both the number of individuals and the number of groups show obvious characteristics of surface aggregation. 5) On the whole, the community characteristics of soil animals all showed a very significant negative correlation with soil pH and a very significant positive correlation with NO 3-N and soil pH.
文章引用:周娇娇, 王庆贵, 孙元, 邢亚娟. 小兴安岭阔叶红松林土壤动物对氮沉降的响应[J]. 世界生态学, 2020, 9(2): 140-150. https://doi.org/10.12677/IJE.2020.92018

参考文献

[1] Galloway, J.N., et al. (2008) Transformation of the Nitrogen Cycle: Recent Trends, Questions, and Potential Solutions. Science, 320, 889-892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 肖辉林. 大气氮沉降与森林生态系统的氮动态[J]. 生态学报, 1996(1): 90-99.
[3] 常运华, 刘学军, 李凯辉, 吕金岭, 宋韦. 大气氮沉降研究进展[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(6): 972-979.
[4] Galloway, J.N., et al. (2004) Nitrogen Cycles: Past, Present, and Future. Biogeochemistry, 70, 153-226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 李俊清. 森林生态学[M]. 第二版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010.
[6] Deca?ns, T., et al. (2006) The Values of Soil Animals for Conservation Biology. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42, S23-S38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 尹文英. 土壤动物学研究的回顾与展望[J]. 生物学通报, 2001(8): 1-3.
[8] 吕若菲, 魏存争. 氮沉降对土壤动物影响的研究进展[J]. 沈阳师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(2): 185-188.
[9] Reay, D.S., et al. (2008) Global Nitrogen Deposition and Carbon Sinks. Nature Geoscience, 1, 430-437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Menta, C. (2012) Soil Fauna Diversity: Function, Soil Degradation, Biological Indices, Soil Restoration. In: Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization in a Diverse World, InTech, London, 59-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Throop, H.L. and Lerdau, M.T.J.E. (2004) Effects of Nitrogen Deposition on Insect Herbivory: Implications for Community and Ecosystem Processes. Ecosystems, 7, 109-133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 徐国良, 莫江明, 周国逸, 彭少麟. 土壤动物与N素循环及对N沉降的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2003(11): 2453-2463.
[13] 徐国良, 莫江明, 周国逸, 薛璟花, 李德军. 模拟氮沉降对苗圃地土壤动物群落的影响[J]. 生态环境, 2004(4): 487-492.
[14] 徐国良, 莫江明, Brown Sandra, 李德军. 土壤动物对模拟N沉降的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2004(10): 2245-2251.
[15] 李曾燕, 邱细容, 陈冠陶, 郑军, 李娟, 涂利华. 多年模拟氮沉降对华西雨屏区苦竹人工林土壤节肢动物的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(5): 1419-1425.
[16] Coulson, J. and Butterfield, J. (1978) An Investigation of the Biotic Factors Determining the Rates of Plant Decomposition on Blanket Bog. Journal of Ecology, 66, 631-650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 徐国良, 莫江明, 周国逸. 氮沉降对三种林型土壤动物群落生物量的影响[J]. 动物学研究, 2005(6): 609-615.
[18] van Diepen, L.T., et al. (2010) Simulated Nitrogen Deposition Causes a Decline of Intra- and Extra-Radical Abundance of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Changes in Microbial Community Structure in Northern Hardwood Forests. Ecosystems, 13, 683-695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Wei, C., et al. (2012) Nitrogen Addition Regulates Soil Nematode Community Composition through Ammonium Suppression. PLoS ONE, 7, e43384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 尹文英. 中国土壤动物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000.
[21] 尹文英. 中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
[22] 土壤动物研究方法手册编写组. 土壤动物研究方法手册[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1998.
[23] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2000.
[24] 辛未冬, 殷秀琴, 秦丽杰, 陈颖彪, 张雪萍, 陈鹏. 小兴安岭森林生态系统中小型土壤动物生态地理分布特征[J]. 地理科学, 2009, 29(1): 129-133.
[25] 张雪萍, 张毅, 侯威岭, 殷秀琴. 小兴安岭针叶凋落物的分解与土壤动物的作用[J]. 地理科学, 2000(6): 552-556.
[26] Micks, P., et al. (2004) Decomposing Litter as a Sink for 15N-Enriched Additions to an Oak Forest and a Red Pine Plantation. Forest Ecology and Management, 196, 71-87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] 张丽娜, 李军, 范鹏, 曹裕, 居玛汗·卡斯木. 黄土高原典型苹果园地深层土壤氮磷钾养分含量与分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(6): 1907-1915.
[28] Magill, A.H., et al. (2000) Long-Term Nitrogen Additions and Nitrogen Saturation in Two Temperate Forests. Ecosystems, 3, 238-253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] 周丹燕, 卜丹蓉, 葛之葳, 严靖, 肖晗冉, 阮宏华, 曹国华. 氮添加对沿海不同林龄杨树人工林土壤动物群落的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(9): 2553-2560.
[30] 徐国良, 莫江明, 周国逸. N沉降下土壤动物群落的响应: 1年研究结果总述[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2006(3): 1-7.
[31] 肖辉林. 大气氮沉降对森林土壤酸化的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2001(4): 111-116.
[32] 张利敏, 杨树安, 张立辉, 张雪萍, 万敏. 土壤动物与全球变化的关系[J]. 哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报, 2016, 32(1): 137-140.
[33] 何振, 赵琴, 李迪强, 李密. 八大公山土壤跳虫群落结构与多样性的季节动态[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(3): 68-77.
[34] Scheu, S., et al. (2005). Interactions between Microorganisms and Soil Micro- and Mesofauna. In: Microorganisms in Soils: Roles in Genesis and Functions, Springer, Berlin, 253-275.[CrossRef
[35] 王邵军, 阮宏华, 汪家社, 徐自坤, 吴焰玉. 武夷山典型植被类型土壤动物群落的结构特征[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(19): 5174-5184.
[36] 曹国华, 张玲, 吴思思, 葛之葳, 阮宏华. 氮添加对苏北杨树人工林土壤动物群落垂直结构的影响[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2015, 42(6): 10-14.
[37] 黄玉梅. 土壤动物群落多样性研究进展[J]. 西部林业科学, 2004(3): 63-68.
[38] 叶贺, 红梅, 赵巴音那木拉, 霍利霞, 高海燕. 水氮控制对荒漠草原中小型土壤动物的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(11): 4325-4333.
[39] 罗梦娇, 李松松, 强大宏, 刘长海. 南泥湾湿地土壤动物群落组成与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(8): 1432-1439.
[40] 邵元虎, 张卫信, 刘胜杰, 王晓丽, 傅声雷. 土壤动物多样性及其生态功能[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(20): 6614-6625.
[41] Huhta, V.J.P. (2007) The Role of Soil Fauna in Ecosystems: A Historical Review. Pedobiologia, 50, 489-495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[42] 宛丽娟, 朱永恒, 谢鑫. 铜陵市横冲流域杉木林下土壤动物群落与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(14): 299-304.