DNA倍体分析在支气管恶性肿瘤中的诊断价值
Clinical Value of DNA Ploidy Analysis in the Diagnosis of Bronchial Malignancy
DOI: 10.12677/WJCR.2020.102007, PDF,   
作者: 柳维军, 杜春梅, 黄新悦, 鲁丹萍:金堂县第一人民医院–四川大学华西医院金堂医院病理科,四川 成都
关键词: 支气管细胞DNA倍体分析脱落细胞检查肿瘤诊断Bronchial Cells DNA Ploidy Analysis Exfoliated Cell Examination Tumor Diagnosis
摘要: 目的:探讨DNA倍体分析配合常规脱落细胞学在支气管恶性肿瘤诊断中的临床意义,寻找对支气管恶性肿瘤,特别是肿瘤早期诊断的理想方法。方法:收集2017年1月~2019年6月我院病理科经活检证实的123例支气管恶性肿瘤患者支气管脱落细胞合格标本作为实验组,235例非恶性肿瘤及上皮内瘤变患者支气管脱落细胞合格标本为对照组,分别进行DNA倍体分析及脱落细胞学检查。结果:支气管脱落细胞检查的特异性高于DNA倍体分析,敏感性低于DNA倍体分析。其总体敏感性为79.67%,总体特异性为98.74%,DNA倍体分析对支气管恶性肿瘤诊断的总体敏感性为100%,总体特异性为97.02%。在支气管恶性肿瘤及不同级别上皮内瘤变中,DNA倍体分析的敏感性明显高于支气管脱落细胞学检查,尤其是对支气管恶性肿瘤及高级别上皮内瘤变的敏感性极高,均大于98.37%。结论:DNA倍体分析对支气管恶性肿瘤或上皮内瘤变诊断的敏感性及重复性均较好,但特异性不足。如结合脱落细胞学检查,可提高支气管恶性肿瘤,特别是肿瘤早期或高级别上皮内瘤变的检出率或准确率,防止误诊及漏诊,是支气管脱落细胞学检测很好的补充。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the clinical value of DNA ploidy analysis combined with conventional abscis-sion cytology in the diagnosis of bronchial malignant tumors, and find an ideal method for early di-agnosis of bronchial malignant tumors. Methods: A total of 123 patients with bronchial malignant tumor confirmed by biopsy admitted to our hospital from January 2017~June 2018 were enrolled in the observation group, and 235 patients with non-malignant tumor and intraepithelial neoplasia were enrolled in the control group. Both groups received DNA ploidy and bronchofiberscope brush smear cytology analysis. Results: The specificity of bronchial exfoliocytology was higher than DNA ploidy analysis, but the sensitivity was lower than DNA ploidy analysis. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 79.67% and 98.74%, respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of DNA ploidy analysis for the diagnosis of bronchial malignancy were 100% and 97.02% respectively. The sensitivity of DNA ploidy analysis was significantly higher than that of exfoliocytology in bron-chial malignancy and different grades of intraepithelial neoplasia, especially in bronchial malig-nancy and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, both of which were highly sensitive (>98.37%). Conclusion: DNA ploidy analysis showed good sensitivity and repeatability in the diagnosis of bronchial malignancy or intraepithelial neoplasia, but less specificity. If combined with exfolio-cytology, detection rate and accuracy of bronchial malignant tumor can be highly improved, espe-cially in the early stage or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Thus, DNA ploidy analysis is a good complement to the detection of bronchial exfoliocytology to prevent misdiagnosis and missed di-agnosis.
文章引用:柳维军, 杜春梅, 黄新悦, 鲁丹萍. DNA倍体分析在支气管恶性肿瘤中的诊断价值[J]. 世界肿瘤研究, 2020, 10(2): 47-51. https://doi.org/10.12677/WJCR.2020.102007

参考文献

[1] 刘彤华, 李维华, 等. 诊断病理学[M]. 第3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012: 121-131.
[2] 夏朝涌. 图像分析仪在测定肿瘤细胞DNA含量、倍体分析中的若干问题[J]. 中华病理学杂志, 1999, 28(4): 307-308.
[3] 中华医学会. 临床诊疗指南: 病理学分册[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 595.
[4] 刘彤华, 刘复生, 等. 疑难外科病理诊断与鉴别诊断[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2006: 67.
[5] 李苗, 刘芳芳, 邸媛, 等. DNA定量分析联合阴道镜在诊断宫颈癌及高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变中的价值[J]. 中国妇幼保健杂志, 2012(18): 2841-2844.
[6] 唐燕, 余龙. 尿路上皮癌诊断中DNA倍体分析和尿脱落细胞学检查的临床价值[J]. 临床与实验病理学杂志, 2015, 31(6): 636-639.
[7] 张林重, 任力, 李炜, 等. 术中组织印片细胞DNA倍体分析在甲状腺疾病中的诊断意义[J]. 诊断病理学杂志, 2016, 23(8): 593-596.
[8] 何秋阳, 钟国梁, 杨国顺, 等. DNA倍体分析与细胞学检测对良恶性浆膜腔积液诊断的比较[J]. 实验与检验医学, 2018, 36(3): 317-319.
[9] 毛志远, 熊梅, 任力, 等. DNA倍体分析在良恶性支气管刷片或支气管灌洗液中的诊断价值[J]. 华西医学, 2014, 29(12): 2226-2229.
[10] Brun, S., Torrisi, R., Costantini, M., et al. (2000) Assessment of DNA Flow Cytometry as a Surrogate End Point Biomarker in a Bladder Cancer Chemoprevention Trial. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 76, 311-321.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 吴康, 满艳茹, 唐文潇, 等. 自动尿液细胞DNA定量分析对泌尿系统炎症与膀胱癌的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中国临床医学, 2016, 23(5): 629-632.
[12] 仲娣, 李彬, 付芸, 等. 三种常用宫颈癌检查方法比较[J]. 中国组织化学与细胞化学志, 2018, 27(5): 476-480+486.
[13] 郭光云, 张立波, 陈功, 等. DNA倍体分析系统鉴别良恶性胸腔积液的价值[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2008(2): 183-185.