去范畴化视角下“行走的X”构式的BCM+模型分析
An Analysis of BCM+模 Model on “Xíngzǒu de X” Construction Based on Decategorization Theory
DOI: 10.12677/ML.2020.83044, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 徐筱帆:四川外国语大学研究生院,重庆
关键词: “行走的X”构式去范畴化BCM+模模型“Xíngzǒu de X” Construction Decategorization BCM+模 Model
摘要: 随着网络语言的飞速发展,“行走的CD”等新表达不断在微信、微博等社交网络平台被人们频繁使用,进入人们的视野和生活,由此诞生出“行走的X”构式。近年来,有学者对“行走的X”构式从认知语言学角度进行了研究,但只关注到构式中“X”部分的隐转喻现象,并没有注意到该构式中的去范畴化现象,将其与语言的社会性加以结合进行研究。鉴于此,本文从认知语言学与社会语言学视角,基于动态范畴化理论的去范畴化理论,将概念整合、构式压制、隐转喻理论以及语言社会性结合在一起,尝试建立整合–压制–隐转喻–社会性模型(Coercion-Blending-Coercion-Metaphor & Metonymy + Sociality Model简称BCM+模型)以解释“行走的X”构式的认知机制,并佐以例句进行定量分析,探究该构式如何在BCM+模型的作用下去范畴化出新含义。
Abstract: With the rapid development of network language, new expressions such as “xíngzǒu de CD” are constantly used on social networking platforms such as WeChat and Weibo, entering people’s vision and life, and thus the “xíngzǒu de X” construction was born. In recent years, some scholars have studied “xíngzǒu de X” construction from the perspective of cognitive linguistics, but they have only paid attention to the metaphorical phenomenon of the “X” part of the construction, and have not noticed the decategorization phenomenon, and have not combined it with the sociality of language to study. In view of this, from the perspective of Cognitive Linguistics and Sociolinguistics, this paper combines Decategorization Theory based on Dynamic Categorization Theory, combining Blending Theory, Construction Coercion, Metaphor & Metonymy Theory, and linguistic sociality to try to establish Blending-Coercion-Metaphor & Metonymy + Sociality Model, for short BCM+ model to explain the cognitive mechanism of the “xíngzǒu de X” construction, and quantitative analyze with example sentences to explore how the construction decategorize new meaning under the BCM+ model.
文章引用:徐筱帆. 去范畴化视角下“行走的X”构式的BCM+模型分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2020, 8(3): 327-335. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2020.83044

参考文献

[1] Croft, W. (1991) Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[2] 田海龙, 赵芃. 批评话语分析再思考——基于辩证唯物主义的语言与社会关系研究[J]. 当代语言学, 2017, 19(4): 494-506.
[3] Hopper, P.J. and Thompson, S.A. (1984) The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar. Language, 60, 703-752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 刘正光. 语言非范畴——语言范畴化理论的重要组成部分[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2006.
[5] 刘正光. 非范畴化与功能多义性[J]. 中国外语, 2005(3): 21-27.
[6] 李小飞, 范振强. 具身哲学视域下的范畴动态构建观[J]. 山东社会科学, 2010(12): 111-114.
[7] 王天翼. 动态范畴化初探[D]: [博士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2017.
[8] Harder, P. (1999) Par-tial Autonomy. Ontology and Methodology in Cognitive Linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 郭松, 田海龙. 语境研究: 从社会语言学到批评话语分析[J]. 外语学刊, 2011(6): 74-77.
[10] 王天翼, 王寅. 认知社会语言学[J]. 中国外语, 2012, 9(2): 44-53.
[11] 苏金智, 张强, 杨亦鸣. 国家语言能力理论新框架研究[J]. 汉字文化, 2019(21): 3-11.
[12] 汪磊. “菜奴”——一个网络词语的诞生[J]. 语文建设, 2011(10): 42-44.
[13] 苏晓军. 认知语言学与文学研究的互动[C]//江苏省外国文学学会. 第四届全国认知语言学研讨会论文摘要汇编.南京: 江苏省外国文学学会, 2019: 109.
[14] 向明友. 言语行为理论评注[J]. 现代外语, 2018, 41(4): 541-549.