钠通道阻滞剂对局灶性癫痫患者皮层兴奋性的影响
Effect of Sodium Channel Blocker on Cortical Excitability in Patients with Focal Epilepsy
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2020.106147, PDF,   
作者: 王 兰*, 彭 淑:山东省青岛市青岛大学医学部,山东 青岛;柳希芹:山东省青岛市青岛大学附属医院康复医学二科,山东 青岛;孙妍萍#:山东省青岛市青岛大学附属医院神经内科,山东 青岛
关键词: 癫痫钠通道阻滞剂静息运动阈值运动诱发电位Epilepsy Sodium Channel Blocker Resting Motor Threshold (RMT) Motor Evoked Potential (MEP)
摘要: 目的:探讨局灶性癫痫患者及钠通道阻滞剂类抗癫痫药物(Anti-epileptic drugs,AEDs)对受试者大脑皮层兴奋性影响的差异。方法:受试者分为局灶未服药组(n = 14)、局灶服药组(n = 17)及正常对照组(n = 15)共3组。利用经颅磁刺激技术测量受试者静息运动阈值、运动诱发电位波幅及潜伏期并对测量值进行统计比较。结果:局灶未服药组与局灶服药组间静息运动阈值的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.017);运动诱发电位波幅的明显差异出现在局灶未服药组(P1 = 0.033)以及局灶服药组(P2 = 0.038)分别与正常对照组的比较中。结论:局灶性癫痫患者较正常人群皮层兴奋性水平明显升高;钠通道阻滞剂能够明显抑制局灶性癫痫患者皮层兴奋性水平。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the difference of excitability of cerebral cortex between patients with focal epilepsy and those with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: The subjects were divided into five groups: focal epilepsy without medication (n = 14), focal epilepsy with medication (n = 17) and normal group (n = 15). The subjects who met the standard were selected to measure the resting motor threshold, the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potential by transcranial magnetic stimulation, and the measured values were compared statistically. Results: In the comparison of resting motor thresholds among groups, there were statistically significant differences between the focal epilepsy without medication and the group of focal epilepsy with medication (P = 0.017). The significant differences in the amplitude of motor evoked potential among groups were found in the comparison of the focal epilepsy without medication and the normal control group respectively (P1 = 0.033). The same difference lies in the group of focal epilepsy with medication and the normal control group respectively (P2 = 0.038). Conclusion: The cortical excitability of patients with focal epilepsy is significantly higher than that of normal people, and sodium channel blocker can significantly inhibit the cortical excitability level of patients with focal epilepsy.
文章引用:王兰, 柳希芹, 彭淑, 孙妍萍. 钠通道阻滞剂对局灶性癫痫患者皮层兴奋性的影响[J]. 临床医学进展, 2020, 10(6): 968-974. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2020.106147

参考文献

[1] Bauer, P.R., Kalitzin, S., Zijlmans, M., Sander, J.W. and Visser, G.H. (2014) Cortical Excitability as a Potential Clinical Marker of Epilepsy: A Review of the Clinical Application of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. International Journal of Neural Systems, 24, Article ID: 1430001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Bauer, P.R., de Goede, A.A., Stern, W.M., Pawley, A.D., Chowdhury, F.A., Helling, R.M., Bouet, R., Kalitzin, S.N., Visser, G.H., Sisodiya, S.M., Rothwell, J.C., Richardson, M.P., van Putten, M.J.A.M. and Sander, J.W. (2018) Long-Interval Intracortical Inhibition as Biomarker for Epilepsy: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 141, 409-421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Bolden, L.B., Griffis, J.C., Pati, S. and Szaflarski, J.P. (2017) Cortical Excitability and Neuropsychological Functioning in Healthy Adults. Neuropsychologia, 102, 190-196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Palmini, A., Akamatsu, N., Bast, T., et al. (2020) From Theory to Practice: Critical Points in the 2017 ILAE Classification of Epileptic Seizures and Epilepsies. Epilepsia, 61, 350-353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Sueri, C., Gasparini, S., Balestrini, S., et al. (2018) Diagnostic Biomarkers of Epilepsy. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 19, 440-450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] De Goede, A.A., terBraack, E.M. and van Putten, M.J.A.M. (2016) Single and Paired Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Drug Naïve Epilepsy. Clinical Neurophysiology, 127, 3140-3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Sofia, C.A., Ricardo, G., Gisbert, C.R., Cardoso, P.D., Guilherme, C., Haniel, A., Barros, C.S., Irina, R., Diego, T., Valquíria, S., Antonio, M.M., Jacobsen, T.M. and de Andrade Daniel, C. (2016) Normative Data of Cortical Excitability Measurements Obtained by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Healthy Subjects. Clinical Neurophysiology, 46, 43-51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Kimiskidis, V.K. and Valentin, A. (2014) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Epilepsy. Current Opinion in Neurology, 27, 236-241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 郭铁成, 蓝青, 黄晓琳, 尤春景, 郭正成, 南登昆. 经颅磁刺激运动诱发电位阈值的研究[J]. 中国康复, 1997(3): 111-113.
[10] Badawy, R.A.B., Jackson, G.D., Berkovic, S.F., et al. (2012) Inter-Session Repeatability of Cortical Excitability Measurements in Patients with Epilepsy. Epilepsy Research, 98, 182-186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 王林晓, 张青, 周先举. 经颅磁刺激在癫痫临床应用的研究进展[J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(19): 47-50.
[12] Janine, R., Frithjof, T., Hamer, H.M., Hans-Helge, M., Susanne, K., Brita, F., et al. (2002) Topiramate Selectively Decreases Intracortical Excitability in Human Motor Cortex. Epilepsia, 43, 1149-1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 尹厚民, 郭谊, 傅国萍, 蒋艳, 丁美萍. 奥卡西平对癫痫患者运动皮质兴奋性的影响[J]. 中国病理生理杂志, 2008(10): 1966-1969.
[14] Nardone, R., Versace, V., Höller, Y., et al. (2018) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Myoclonus of Different Aetiologies. Brain Research Bulletin, 140, 258-269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Caroline, M., Noritoshi, A., Lücke, J., et al. (2009) Hysteresis Effects on the Input-Output Curve of Motor Evoked Potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 1003-1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Badawy Radwa, A.B., Gionata, S. and Roberto, C. (2014) TMS, Cortical Excitability and Epilepsy: The Clinical Impact. Epilepsy Research, 108, 153-161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]