大学生未来时间洞察力对主观幸福感的影响：社会支持和应对方式的多重中介效应
Influence of Future Time Perception on Subjective Well-Being of College Students: Multiple Mediating Effects of Social Support and Coping Style
摘要: 目的：探讨大学生社会支持、应对方式对其未来时间洞察力和主观幸福感关系的多重中介作用。方法：采用青少年未来时间洞察力量表、社会支持评定量表、简易应对方式量表、生活满意度量表和幸福感指数量表对325名大学生进行问卷调查。结果：1) 相关分析显示，未来时间洞察力、社会支持、积极应对、情感指数和生活满意度两两之间均呈显著正相关(p < 0.01)；消极应对与未来时间洞察力呈显著负相关(p < 0.01)，与社会支持和主观满意度相关不显著。2) 多重中介效应分析表明，未来时间洞察力能通过社会支持和积极应对的中介作用对主观幸福感产生影响，且该中介作用包含了三条路径——社会支持和积极应对的单独中介作用以及社会支持–积极应对的链式中介作用。结论：1) 大学生未来时间洞察力可以直接影响其主观幸福感，也可以通过提高其社会支持和积极应对间接影响；2) 大学生消极应对并不一定带来消极的后果而降低其主观幸福感。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the multiple mediating effects of social support and coping style on the relationship between future time perception and subjective well-being of college students. Methods: 325 college students were surveyed with the Future time Perception Scale, Social Support Rating Scale, Simple Coping Style Scale, Life Satisfaction Scale and Happiness Index. Results: 1) correlation analysis showed significant positive correlation among future time perception, social support, positive coping, emotional index and life satisfaction (p < 0.01). Negative coping was significantly negatively correlated with future time perception (p < 0.01), but not significantly correlated with social support and subjective satisfaction. 2) Multiple mediating effect analysis shows that future time perception can influence SUBJECTIVE well-being through the mediating effect of social support and positive coping, and the mediating effect includes three paths—the single mediating effect of social support and positive coping and the chain mediating effect of social support and positive coping. Conclusion: 1) the future time perception of college students can directly affect their subjective well-being, but also can improve their social support and positively deal with the indirect impact; 2) Individuals’ negative coping does not necessarily bring about negative consequences and reduce their subjective well-being.
文章引用：伍露 (2020). 大学生未来时间洞察力对主观幸福感的影响：社会支持和应对方式的多重中介效应. 心理学进展, 10(8), 1079-1086. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.108128

参考文献

[1] 敖玲敏, 吕厚超, 黄希庭(2011). 社会情绪选择理论概述. 心理科学进展, (2), 79-85.
[2] 丁新华, 王极盛(2004). 青少年主观幸福感研究述评. 心理科学进展, (1), 59-66.
[3] 贺寨平(2001). 国外社会支持网研究综述. 国外社会科学, (1), 79-85.
[4] 黄希庭, 余华, 郑涌, 等(2000). 中学生应对方式的初步研究. 心理科学, (1), 1-5, 124.
[5] 解亚宁(1998). 简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, (2), 114-115.
[6] 梁群君, 武碧云, 林妙莲, 李放, 郑雪(2017). 毕业生未来时间洞察力对主观幸福感的影响: 社会支持和职业决策自我效能感的多重中介效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, (6), 157-161.
[7] 满丛英, 吴贤华(2019). 应对方式在社会支持和主观幸福感间的中介作用——以武汉地区大学生为例. 黄冈师范学院学报, (4), 123-127.
[8] 宋佳萌, 范会勇(2013). 社会支持与主观幸福感关系的元分析. 心理科学进展, (8), 31-44.
[9] 宋其争(2004). 大学生未来时间洞察力的理论和实证研究(页104-112). 重庆: 西南师范大学.
[10] 佟月华(2004). 大学生一般自我效能感、应对方式及主观幸福感的相关研究. 中国学校卫生, (4), 18-19.
[11] 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘(1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社.
[12] 王桢, 陈雪峰, 时勘(2006). 大学生应对方式、社会支持与心理健康的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, (4), 52-54.
[13] 吴明霞(2000). 30年来西方关于主观幸福感的理论发展. 心理学动态, (4), 24-29.
[14] 叶一舵, 申艳娥(2002). 应对及应对方式研究综述. 心理科学, (6), 755-756.
[15] 张建人, 黄懿(2007). 大学生社会支持、应对方式及其与主观幸福感的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, (6), 74-76.
[16] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[17] 庄妍, 张典兵(2015). 大学生未来时间洞察力与主观幸福感: 学习投入的中介效应. 教育评论, (7), 87-89 + 116.
[18] Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The Quality of American Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
[19] Carstensen, L. L. (1987). Age-Related Changes in Social Activity. In L. L. Carstensen, & B. A. Edelstein (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Gerontology (pp. 222-237). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
[20] Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The Influence of a Sense of Time on Human Development. Science, 312, 1913-1915.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Chen, D. K. S., Cheung, A., Gray, A., & Lee, B. (2004). Identifying the Psycho Social Correlates of Condom Use by Female Sex Workers in Hong Kong. AIDS Care, 16, 530-539.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Chua, L. W., Milfont, T. L., & Jose, P. E. (2015). Coping Skills Help Explain How Future-Oriented Adolescents Accrue Greater Well-Being over Time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2028-2041.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Gallagher, E. N., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2008). Social Support and Emotional Intelligence as Predictors of Subjective Well-Being. Personality & Individual Differences, 44, 1551-1561.
[CrossRef] 
[25] Granovettor, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
[CrossRef] 
[26] Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
[27] Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time Counts: Future Time Perspective, Goals, and Social Relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17, 125-139.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Lv, H. C., & Huang, X. T. (2016). Development and Validation of the Future Time Perspective Inventory for Adolescents and Young Adults. Time & Society, 25, 533-551.
[CrossRef] 
[29] Margaret, G., Irving, F., Hoffman et al. (1998). Improving Sexually Transmitted Disease Management in the Private Sector: The Jamaica Experience. AIDS, 12, 68-72.
[30] Platt, J., Keyes, K. M., & Koenen, K. C. (2014). Size of the Social Network versus Quality of Social Support: Which Is More Protective against PTSD. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49, 1279-1286.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and Measurement of Temporal Focus: The Subjective Experience of the Past, Present, and Future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 1-22.
[CrossRef] 
[32] Thomas, J. C. (2000). Efficacy of Voluntary HIV-1 Counseling and Testing in Individuals and Couples in Kenya, Tanzania, and Trinidad: A Randomized Trial. The Lancet, 356, 103-112.
[CrossRef] 
[33] Thomas, M. (2001). Voluntary Counseling and Testing for Couples: A High-Lever Age Intervention for HIV/AIDS Prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1397-1411.
[CrossRef]