债券通的实施对债券信用评级的影响研究
Research on the Impact of the Bond Connect on Bond Credit Rating
DOI: 10.12677/FIA.2020.94011, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 高 芳, 董文林:东华大学旭日工商管理学院,上海
关键词: 债券通信用评级声誉投资者关注 Bond Connect Credit Rating Reputation Investors’ Attention
摘要: “债券通”的实施推动了境内债券市场与国际制度接轨,促进了中国资本市场进一步开放。本文以“债券通”的实施这一事件为契机,以2015~2019年A股上市公司发行的中期票据和企业债为样本,结合倾向得分匹配思想和双重差分模型实证研究了“债券通”的实施是否对债券信用评级能产生影响。研究结果发现:“债券通”的实施会使债券信用评级降低,并且这一关系在声誉较高的评级机构和投资者关注度的公司中更为明显。这说明“债券通”实施对提升信用评级质量具有积极作用,有助于完善债券市场体系建设和促进信用评级行业发展。本文拓展了资本市场开放影响的相关研究,也为债券通的进一步推行提供了理论依据
Abstract: The implementation of Bond Connect system has promoted the integration of domestic bond market with international system, which is conducive to the further opening of China's capital market. Taking medium-term notes and corporate bonds issued by A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2019 as samples, this paper uses PSM-DID to empirically study whether the implementation of Bond Connect system can affect the bond credit rating. The results show that the implementation of Bond Connect system will reduce the credit rating of bonds, and this relationship is more obvious in rating agencies with high reputation and companies with high investor attention. This shows that the implementation of Bond Connect system plays a positive role in improving the quality of credit rating, and helps to improve the construction of bond market system and promote the development of credit rating industry. This paper expands the relevant research on the impact of capital market opening, and also provides a theoretical basis for the further implementation of the bond link system.
文章引用:高芳, 董文林. 债券通的实施对债券信用评级的影响研究[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2020, 9(4): 79-88. https://doi.org/10.12677/FIA.2020.94011

参考文献

[1] 宗良, 陈思宇. 债券通与全球资产配置[J]. 中国金融, 2017(16): 71-73.
[2] 桂浩明. 债券通与资本市场开放[J]. 中国金融, 2017(12): 56-57.
[3] 彭飞, 朱建林. 中国债券市场对外开放现状、问题与建议[J]. 现代管理科学, 2018(5): 21-23.
[4] Goel, A.M. and Thakor, A.V. (2015) Information Reliability and Welfare: A Theory of Coarse Credit Ratings. Journal of Financial Economics, 115, 541-557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 姚红宇. 评级机构声誉机制与评级上调——来自中国信用评级的证据[J]. 经济学报, 2019, 6(2): 125-154.
[6] Jiang, X.F., Stanford, M.H. and Xie, Y. (2012) Does It Matter Who Pays for Bond Ratings? Historical Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 607-621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Becker, B. and Milbourn, T. (2011) How did Increased Compe-tition Affect Credit Ratings? Journal of Financial Economics, 101, 493-541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 王冠楠, 项卫星, 卢书媛. 中国信用评级市场开放对国内企业评级的影响[J]. 国际金融研究, 2018(8): 78-87.
[9] 常殊昱. 开放对中国债券市场的影响[J]. 中国金融, 2019(9): 38-39.
[10] 华鸣, 孙谦. 外国投资者降低了新兴市场股价崩盘风险吗——来自“沪港通”的经验证据[J]. 当代财经, 2018(1): 57-67.
[11] 郭阳生, 沈烈, 郭枚香. 沪港通改善了上市公司信息环境吗?——基于分析师关注度的视角[J]. 证券市场导报, 2018(10): 35-43, 50.
[12] 施燕平, 刘娥平. 资本结构调整、信用评级与公司债券融资成本[J]. 财贸研究, 2018, 29(1): 86-98.
[13] 黄小琳, 朱松, 陈关亭. 债券违约对涉事信用评级机构的影响——基于中国信用债市场违约事件的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017(3): 130-144.
[14] 周冬华, 方瑄, 黄文德. 境外投资者与高质量审计需求——来自沪港通政策实施的证据[J]. 审计研究, 2018(6): 56-64.