家庭赋权护理联合心理行为干预提高骨肉瘤患者术后家庭生活质量的疗效观察
Effect of Family Empowerment Nursing Combined with Psychological and Behavioral Intervention on Improving Family Life Quality of Patients with Osteosarcoma after Operation
摘要: 目的：探究家庭赋权护理联合心理行为干预提高骨肉瘤患者术后家庭生活质量的疗效。方法：本研究选择自2017年1月1日~2019年6月1日入我院骨科进行保守治疗的患者，100例，按照数字表法随机分组，分成对照组50例和观察组50例。观察组采用家庭赋权护理联合心理行为干预骨肉瘤患者的治疗，对照组采用常规护理方案。利用焦虑自评量表(SAS)，抑郁自评量表(SDS)测量患者和家属的负面情绪。结果：两组患者的一般基准资料无统计学差异(P > 0.05)；两组患者和患者家属入院时SAS评分和SDS评分比较无统计学差异(P > 0.05)；手术后24 h，出院时和出院后2个月SAS评分和SDS评分比较具有统计学差异(P < 0.01)。两组患者家属的赋权心理护理，自我支持维护和情感支持维护比较具有统计学差异(P < 0.01)。结论：家庭赋权护理联合心理干预护理方案有助于骨肉瘤患者术后的社会属性的回归，促进家庭关系和谐，提高生活质量。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the effect of family empowerment nursing combined with psychological and behavioral intervention to improve the quality of family life of patients with osteosarcoma. Methods: From January 1, 2017 to June 1, 2019, 100 patients were randomly divided into control group (n = 50) and observation group (n = 50). The observation group was treated with family empowerment nursing combined with psychological and behavioral intervention, while the control group was given routine nursing. Self rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and self rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to measure the negative emotions of patients and their families. Results: There was no significant difference in the general baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05); there was no significant difference in SAS score and SDS score between the two groups and their family members at admission (P > 0.05); there were significant differences in SAS score and SDS score at 24 h after operation, at discharge and 2 months after discharge (P < 0.01). There were significant differences in empowerment psychological care, self support maintenance and emotional support maintenance between the two groups (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The family empowerment nursing combined with psychological intervention nursing program is helpful to the regression of social attributes of patients with osteosarcoma after operation, promote the harmony of family relationship and improve the quality of life.
文章引用：阮璐瑶. 家庭赋权护理联合心理行为干预提高骨肉瘤患者术后家庭生活质量的疗效观察[J]. 医学诊断, 2020, 10(4): 254-259. https://doi.org/10.12677/MD.2020.104040

参考文献

[1] Duffaud, F., Mir, O., Boudou-Rouquette, P., et al. (2019) Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Adult Patients with Metastatic Osteosarcoma: A Non-Comparative, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Study. The Lancet Oncology, 20, 120-133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Davis, L.E., Bolejack, V., Ryan, C.W., et al. (2019) Randomized Double-Blind Phase II Study of Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Osteo-sarcoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 37, 1424-1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 王风兰, 吴爱萍. 分析心理护理对骨肉瘤患者手术后生活质量的影响[J]. 心理医生, 2019, 25(2): 295-296.
[4] 李小平, 米丽娜. 全程化康复护理在治疗骨肉瘤患者中的应用[J]. 当代护士(学术版), 2019, 26(1): 71-72.
[5] 文英霞, 刘芳琴. 围术期心理护理干预对骨肉瘤手术患者应激状态的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2019, 26(2): 234-237.
[6] 张慧, 周郁秋, 谢潇冰, 等. 癌症患者康复期心理行为干预模式及效果研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2009, 44(8): 681-684.
[7] 张旭, 任蔚虹, 泮燕红. 家庭赋权方案对首发脑卒中患者主要照顾者的影响研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2018(2): 133-138.
[8] 田莉. 行为转变理论的整体护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者焦虑自评量表评分及生活质量的影响[J]. 实用医技杂志, 2018(5): 1-2.
[9] 段泉泉, 胜利. 焦虑及抑郁自评量表的临床效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2012, 26(9): 676-679.
[10] 李亚利, 桂萍. 康复护理模式对膝关节周围骨肉瘤患者假体置换术后生活质量的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2020, 27(5): 97-100.
[11] 吴秋爱. 全程化康复护理在治疗骨肉瘤患者中应用[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2019, 26(S1): 263-264.
[12] 刘薇, 郭爱敏. 居家失能老人照顾者赋权能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2017, 23(20): 11-13.
[13] 李贞贞, 周露, 李现红, 等. 基于赋权理论的家庭访视对艾滋病患者生活质量的影响[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2015, 37(15): 1576-1581.
[14] 陈七弟, 谌媛媛, 喻田田. 路径式健康教育对骨肉瘤化疗患者疾病管理能力的影响[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2020, 38(3): 152-153.