防城港核电厂CPR1000机型氢气火灾风险研究
Hydrogen Fire Risk Analysis on CPR1000 System of Fangchenggang Nuclear Power Plant
DOI: 10.12677/NST.2021.91003, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 周学进:华侨大学机电及自动化学院,福建 厦门;何 乐, 祝 赫:中广核工程有限公司,广东 深圳;涂 然:中国科学技术大学火灾科学国家重点实验室,安徽 合肥
关键词: 安全工程氢气事故燃烧爆炸事故树–层次分析核电安全Safety Engineering Hydrogen Accident Combustion and Explosion Accident Tree-Analytic Hierarchy Nuclear Safety
摘要: 新世纪以来核力发电得到越来越广泛的使用,核电站在运行过程中会产生和应用到大量氢气,一旦发生氢气火灾极易导致爆炸,将具有极大破坏性。本文通过对中广核防城港核电厂的CPR1000机型进行实地调研分析,运用事故树方法对核电站的危险源特性及危险度层级进行了系统研究。核电厂内部的危险源相对复杂,导致事故树顶上事件发生的最小割集达到945个,最小径集则有4个。进一步利用事故树–层次分析法分析,计算各危险因素权重,发现通风装置和氢气处理系统发生故障对于事故发生概率的影响最大(~10%)。本项工作可望为核电厂的氢气事故防治提供工程参考。
Abstract: Hydrogen is widely used or generated during the nuclear power generation operation, which may bring high damage by hydrogen combustion and explosion. For the purpose of nuclear safety involved with hydrogen, the CPR1000 system of CGNPC (China General Nuclear Power Corporation) was investigated, and a fault tree analysis was performed. The results show that there are 945 minimum and 4 minimum path cut sets that cause events on the top of the hydrogen accident tree. With application of the accident tree-analytic hierarchy process, numerical methods were used to calculate the weight of each factor. The results show that the failure of the ventilation device and the hydrogen treatment system had a greater impact on the accident.
文章引用:周学进, 何乐, 祝赫, 涂然. 防城港核电厂CPR1000机型氢气火灾风险研究[J]. 核科学与技术, 2021, 9(1): 21-28. https://doi.org/10.12677/NST.2021.91003

参考文献

[1] Holt, M., Campbell, R.J. and Nikitin, M.B. (2012) Fukushima Nuclear Disaster. Congressional Research Service Reports.
[2] 牛东晓, 宋宗耘. 基于熵值法和物元可拓模型的核电站安全运行状态评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2015, 15(5): 25-29.
[3] 肖华华, 孙金华. 高压氢气泄漏自燃研究现状及展望[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2009, 9(4): 125-129.
[4] 张洪江, 黄同林, 伍丽萍, 等. 化工园区火灾风险控制对策研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2015, 34(4): 533-535.
[5] James, H., Harris, M.J. and Hall, S.F. (1992) Comparison of Event Tree, Fault Tree and Markov Methods for Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Application to Accident Mitigation. Institution of Chemical Engineers, United Kingdom.
[6] 张村峰, 卞奇侃, 蒋军成. 基于“事故树-层次分析法”的高校学生宿舍火灾风险分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2011(10): 100-105.
[7] Labib, A. and Harris, M.J. (2015) Learning How to Learn from Failures: The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster. Engineering Failure Analysis, 47, 117-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Saghafi, M. and Ghofrani, M.B. (2016) Accident Management Support Tools in Nuclear Power Plants: A Post-Fukushima Review. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 92, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Fesenko, S.V., Alexakhin, R.M., Balonov, M.I., et al. (2007) An Extended Critical Review of Twenty Years of Countermeasures Used in Agriculture after the Chernobyl Accident. Science of the Total Environment, 383, 1-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 魏巍. 核电厂严重事故关键仿真模型及耦合技术研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2019.
[11] 吕跃进, 张维, 曾雪兰. 指数标度与1~9标度互不相容及其比较研究[J]. 工程数学学报, 2003(8): 77-81.
[12] 洪志国, 李焱. 层次分析法中高阶平均随机一致性指标(RI)的计算[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2002, 38(12): 45-47.