中国背景下的老年人主观幸福感影响因素的元分析
A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors of the Subjective Well-Being of the Elderly in China
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2021.111013, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 房华玲#, 金灿灿*:北京林业大学人文学院心理学系,北京
关键词: 老年人主观幸福感元分析The Elderly Subjective Well-Being Meta-Analysis
摘要: 目的:分析我国老年人主观幸福感的影响因素。方法:在国内各大数据库,搜集老年人主观幸福感影响因素的文献,按照相应标准逐一纳入和剔除,共纳入173篇文献,76,216名被试,使用CMA3.0软件进行元分析。结果:老年人主观幸福感影响因素的效应值从大到小分别为精神寄托(r = 0.136)、身体机能(r = 0.129)、社会关系(r = 0.082);具体而言,老年人主观幸福感与身体状况、婚姻状况、社会支持、兴趣爱好、性别(1 = 女,2 = 男)、医疗保障、经济来源达到显著正相关,与居住情况(1 = 合居,2 = 独居)、居住地(1 = 城市,2 = 农村)达到显著负相关。结论:精神寄托、身体机能和社会关系对老年人的主观幸福感有较好的预测力。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the influencing factors of the subjective well-being of the elderly in China. Methods: We collected the literature, included 173 studies and 76,216 subjects, on the influencing factors of elderly subjective well-being in the domestic major databases and used the method of meta-analysis by CMA 3.0 software. Results: The effect size of the factors influencing the subjective well-being of the elderly was as follows: spiritual support (r = 0.136), physical function (r = 0.129), social relations (r = 0.082). In particular, the subjective well-being of the elderly was correlated positively with physical status, marital status, social support, gender, medical security, economic sources, and correlated negatively with living conditions, hobbies, and residence. Conclusion: Spiritual support, physical function and social relations can predict strongly on the subjective well-being of the elderly.
文章引用:房华玲, 金灿灿 (2021). 中国背景下的老年人主观幸福感影响因素的元分析. 心理学进展, 11(1), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.111013

参考文献

[1] 曹希, 王秀华, 谷灿, 张平, 唐懿芳(2016). 长沙市老年公寓老年人主观幸福感及影响因素. 中国老年学杂志, 36(5), 1201-1203.
[2] 陈光菊, 李慧, 徐维国, 等(2018). 绵阳市涪城区城市老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者主观幸福感现状及影响因素. 职业与健康, 34(8), 1064-1067.
[3] 董博, 张丽娟, 宋艳丽(2018). 城市漂族老年人主观幸福感及其影响因素研究. 护理研究, 32(24), 3971-3973.
[4] 段建华(1996). 主观幸福感概述. 心理学动态, 1(30), 46-51.
[5] 郭薇, 刘连龙(2017). 乌鲁木齐市老年人主观幸福感及其影响因素. 中国老年学杂志, 37(16), 4133-4136.
[6] 李鹏姬, 马海林(2020). 藏族大学生社会支持与主观幸福感的关系: 自尊的中介作用. 心理月刊, 15(4), 34-35+37.
[7] 梁晓庆, 贾慜, 李英华(2017). 养老院护理员关怀能力对老年人主观幸福感的影响. 护理研究, 31(7), 806-809.
[8] 林榕, 宋继红, 杨贵芳, 等(2014). 福州市养老机构老年人主观幸福感与社会支持的相关性. 中国老年学杂志, 34(12), 3426-3429.
[9] 罗扬眉, 胡华, 朱志红, 等(2008). 湖南省老年人亲子支持与主观幸福感的相关研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, (2), 173-175.
[10] 马丁•塞利格曼(2010). 真实的幸福. 沈阳: 万卷出版公司.
[11] 牛桂芳, 孙建萍, 宋丹(2013). 养老机构老年人主观幸福感及影响因素分析. 全科护理, 11(30), 2860-2861.
[12] 任杰, 金志成, 杨秋娟(2010). 老年人主观幸福感影响因素的元分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(1), 119-121+62.
[13] 任琼琼, 李杰, 余丹丹, 等(2018). 安徽省某地区农村独居老年人主观幸福感及影响因素研究. 中华疾病控制杂志, 22(6), 45-48.
[14] 王雪梅, 李鸥(2011). “幸福”的量化. 中国统计, (7), 44-45.
[15] 钟美珠, 谢云天(2019). 基于纽芬兰纪念大学幸福感量表的养老机构老年人幸福感meta分析. 中国老年学杂志, 39(4), 202-204.
[16] Beck, J. G., Grant, D. M. M., Read, J. P., Clapp, J. D., Coffey, S. F., Miller, L. M. et al. (2008). The Impact of Event Scale-Revised: Psychometric Properties in a Sample of Motor Vehicle Accident Survivors. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 187-198.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. et al. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Gagliardi, C., Marcellini, F., Papa, R., Giuli, C., & Mollenkopf, H. (2010). Associations of Personal and Mobility Resources with Subjective Well-Being among Older Adults in Italy and Germany. Archives of Gerontology & Geriatrics, 50, 42-47.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Hu, J. D., Dong, Y. H., Chen, X. D. et al. (2015). Prevalence of Suicide Attempts among Chinese Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 61, 78-89.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2000). Practical Me-ta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[21] Rosenthal, R. (1979). The File Drawer Problem and Tolerance for Null Results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.[CrossRef