高能中微子辐射背景对潮汐瓦解事件黑洞质量限制的研究
Constraints on TDE Black Hole Mass by Diffused High Energy Neutrino Background
摘要: 潮汐瓦解事件(简称TDE)是一种发生在黑洞周围的高能天体物理事件,它被认为是探测宁静星系中心黑洞的探针,同时也是高能宇宙线和高能中微子的辐射源之一。在本文中,我们首先假设IceCube观测上的高能中微子辐射背景源于潮汐瓦解事件,通过构建潮汐瓦解事件产生的高能中微子辐射模型,拟合观测数据,对发生潮汐瓦解事件的黑洞质量参数空间和物理性质进行限制。最优拟合模型表明,黑洞质量区间为 时,喷流型TDE所产生的高能中微子辐射贡献了观测上辐射背景能量峰值处的主要流量。这意味着喷流型TDE与黑洞质量大小的反相关关系,以及这也暗示着也许依旧存在大量具有喷流的潮汐瓦解事件尚未被发现。此外,该最优模型首次定量地给出,质量区间涵括中等质量黑洞范围的随红移演化的黑洞质量函数,其大小正比于(1 + z)−2.667
Abstract: Tidal Disruption Event (TDE) is one of the high-energy astrophysical events that occur around black holes. They are considered as probes of detecting black holes at the centers of quiescent galaxies, as well as sources of high-energy cosmic rays and high-energy neutrinos. In this paper, we firstly assume that the high-energy neutrino flux background observed by IceCube collaboration originated from TDEs. By constructing the TDE-produced high-energy neutrino model and fitting it to observation data, we constrain the lower limit of black hole mass and other black hole mass dependent parameters which are related to the jet fraction of TDEs and redshift-evolved black hole mass function. Our optimal model shows that when the TDE mass lies in the range of , the high-energy neutrino flux produced by jet TDEs, which dominantly contributes the peak flux of neutrino background. It also implies an anti-correlation between jet fraction of TDEs and their black hole mass, this may indicate that a large number of jet-TDEs at the low-mass end are still unveiling. In addition, our model also firstly gives the redshift-dependent evolutional index of black hole mass function, which covers the intermediate mass range that is greater than , its value is proportional to (1 + z)−2.667.
文章引用:杨里程. 高能中微子辐射背景对潮汐瓦解事件黑洞质量限制的研究[J]. 现代物理, 2021, 11(3): 69-76. https://doi.org/10.12677/MP.2021.113009

参考文献

[1] Rees, M.J. (1988) Tidal Disruption of Stars by Black Holes of 106-108 Solar Masses in Nearby Galaxies. Nature, 333, 523-528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Dai, L., McKinney, J.C., Roth, N., et al. (2018) A Unified Model for Tidal Disruption Events. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 859, L20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Auchettl, K., Guillochon, J. and Ramirez-Ruiz, E. (2017) New Physical Insights about Tidal Disruption Events from a Comprehensive Observational Inventory at X-Ray Wavelengths. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 838, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] van Velzen, S., Gezari, S., Hammerstein, E., et al. (2020) Seven-teen Tidal Disruption Events from the First Half of ZTF Survey Observations: Entering a New Era of Population Studies. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 908, 4V. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Komossa, S. (2015) Tidal Disruption of Stars by Supermassive Black Holes: Status of Observations. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 7, 148-157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Piran, T. and Krolik, J. (2012) Time Scales in Tidal Disruption Events. European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, 39, Article No. 02006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Burrows, D.N., Kennea, J.A., Ghisellini, G., et al. (2011) Re-lativistic Jet Activity from the Tidal Disruption of a Star by a Massive Black Hole. Nature, 476, 421-424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Cenko, S.B., Krimm, H.A., Horesh, A., et al. (2012) Swift J2058.4+0516: Discovery of a Possible Second Relativistic Tidal Disruption Flare? The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 753, Article No. 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Tchekhovskoy, A., Metzger, B.D., Giannios, D., et al. (2014) Swift J1644+57 Gone MAD: The Case for Dynamically Important Magnetic Flux Threading the Black Hole in a Jetted Tidal Disruption Event. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 437, 2744-2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Curd, B. and Narayan, R. (2019) GRRMHD Simulations of Tidal Disruption Event Accretion Discs around Supermassive Black Holes: Jet Formation, Spectra, and Detectability. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 483, 565-592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Biehl, D., Boncioli, D., Lunardini, C. and Winter, W. (2018) Tidally Disrupted Stars as a Possible Origin of Both Cosmic rays and Neutrinos at the Highest Energies. Scientific Reports, 8, Article No. 10828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Lunardini, C. and Winter, W. (2017) High Energy Neutrinos from the Tidal Disruption of Stars. Physical Review D, 95, Article ID: 123001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Stein, R., van Velzen, S., Kowalski, M., et al. (2020) A High-Energy Neutrino Coincident with a Tidal Disruption Event.
[14] Becker, J.K. (2008) High-Energy Neutrinos in the Context of Multimessenger astrophysics. Physics Reports, 458, 173-246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] IceCube Collaboration, Aartsen, M.G., Ackermann, M., et al. (2017) The IceCube Neutrino Observatory—Contributions to ICRC 2017 Part II: Properties of the Atmospheric and As-trophysical Neutrino Flux.
[16] Wang, X.-Y., Liu, R.-Y., Dai, Z.-G., et al. (2011) Probing the Tidal Disruption Flares of Massive Black Holes with High-Energy Neutrinos. Physical Review D, 84, Article ID: 081301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Merritt, D. (2013) Loss-Cone Dynamics. Classical and Quan-tum Gravity, 30, Article ID: 244005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Stone, N.C. and Metzger, B.D. (2016) Rates of Stellar Tidal Disruption as Probes of the Supermassive Black Hole Mass Function. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 455, 859-883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Pfister, H., Volonteri, M., Lixin Dai, J. and Colpi, M. (2020) En-hancement of the Tidal Disruption Event Rate in Galaxies with a Nuclear Star Cluster: From Dwarfs to Ellipticals. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 497, 2276-2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Wevers, T., Stone, N.C., van Velzen, S., et al. (2019) Black Hole Masses of Tidal Disruption Event Host Galaxies II. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 487, 4136-4152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Gallo, E. and Sesana, A. (2019) Exploring the Local Black Hole Mass Function below 106 Solar Masses. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 883, L18A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Shankar, F., Weinberg, D.H. and Miralda-Escudé, J. (2009) Self-Consistent Models of the AGN and Black Hole Populations: Duty Cycles, Accretion Rates, and the Mean Radiative Efficiency. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 690, 20-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Pandey, M., Majumdar, D. and Halder, A. (2019) IceCube PeV Neutrino Events from the Decay of Superheavy Dark Matter: An Analysis.
[24] De Colle, F. and Lu, W. (2019) Jets from Tidal Disruption Events. New Astronomy Reviews, 89, Article ID: 101538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef