论诉讼上抵销的行使
On the Exercise of Set-Off in Litigation
DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2021.93062, PDF,   
作者: 毛晨冉:宁波大学,浙江 宁波
关键词: 诉讼上抵销抗辩反诉Litigation Offset Litigation Set-off Defense Counterclaim
摘要: 诉讼上抵销是指在民事诉讼中,被告首次提出以自己的债权抵销原告作为诉讼请求的债权。诉讼上抵销应统一以抗辩形式提出,当抵销债权与被抵销债权为非同一民事法律关系或是无相同的事实基础,法院可以将两个债权分开进行辩论。当抗辩的原因事实较为复杂、需要评估鉴定、双方争议较大、经过举证质证后仍然无法查清事实时,法院基于该适度、合理的原则可停止在诉讼中对于抵销事由的审查,驳回被告提出的抵销性抗辩,被告可就抵销债权另行起诉。
Abstract: Set-off in litigation means that in civil litigation, the defendant first proposes to set off the plaintiff's claim with his own claim. In litigation, set-off should be put forward in the form of defense. When the offset claims are not the same civil legal relationship or have no same factual basis, the court can debate the two creditors’ rights separately. When the reasons and facts of the defense are complex, need to be evaluated and identified, the disputes between the two parties are large, and it is still impossible to find out the real time after the cross examination of evidence, the court can stop ex-amining the cause of set-off in the litigation based on the principle of moderation and rationality, reject the set-off defense proposed by the defendant, and the defendant can sue separately for the set-off claim.
文章引用:毛晨冉. 论诉讼上抵销的行使[J]. 法学, 2021, 9(3): 437-444. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2021.93062

参考文献

[1] 刘学在. 论诉讼中的抵销上[J]. 法学评论(双月刊), 2003, 21(4): 58.
[2] 陈桂明, 李仕春. 论诉讼上的抵销[J]. 法学研究, 2005, 27(5): 52.
[3] 刘哲玮. 论诉讼抵销在中国法上的实现路径[J]. 现代法学, 2019, 41(1): 149.
[4] 张卫平. 民事诉讼法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2004: 270.
[5] 刘哲玮. 普通形成权诉讼类型考辨——以合同解除权为例[J]. 中外法学, 2014, 26(5): 1331.
[6] [日]新堂幸司. 新民事诉讼法[M]. 林剑锋, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2008: 301.
[7] [德]罗森贝克, 施巧布. 德国民事诉讼法(下) [M]. 李大雪, 译. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2007: 748.
[8] 刘哲玮. 论诉讼抵销在中国法上的实现路径[J]. 现代法学, 2019, 41(1): 149-158.
[9] 段文波. 民事裁判构造论: 以请求权为核心展开[J]. 现代法学, 2012, 34(1): 147.
[10] [日]高桥宏志. 民事诉讼法——制度与理论的深层分析[M]. 林剑锋, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 241.
[11] [德]罗森贝克, 施巧布. 德国民事诉讼法(下) [M]. 李大雪, 译. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2007: 242.