新能源汽车补贴对空气质量的影响——以广东省为例
The Influence of Subsidy Policy on Air Quality of New Energy Vehicles—A Case Study of Guangdong Province
摘要: 新能源汽车补贴政策是我国为了节能减排与产业升级所实施的重要政策。近年大幅补贴退坡带来环境隐患。本文使用政策实施程度不同的城市的空气质量数据进行因果检验,识别补贴政策对环境的改善,从而给出政策建议。结果表明,2017年的新能源汽车补贴退坡20%的政策对于空气质量影响在近期不明确;在滞后几期有负面作用,滞后三期时,NO2在5%置信区间上显著上升,在滞后四期时AQI指数在5%置信区间显著上升0.112%。CO和O3均在10%水平显著上升,分别为0.062%和0.197%。研究表明,新能源汽车补贴退坡对空气质量存在一定影响,是制定政策时需要考虑的一项因素。
Abstract: The subsidy policy of new energy vehicles is an important policy for energy conservation, emission reduction and industrial upgrading in China. In recent years, the steep decline of subsidies has brought environmental risks. In this paper, the air quality data of cities with different degrees of policy implementation are used for causal test to identify the environmental improvement of subsidy policies, so as to give policy suggestions. The results show that in 2017, the policy of sub-sidies for new energy vehicles to reverse 20% of the impact on air quality in the near future is not clear; there was a negative effect in several lagging periods. In the third lagging period, NO2 signif-icantly increased in the 5% confidence interval, and in the fourth lagging period, AQI significantly increased in the 5% confidence interval by 0.112%. CO and O3 both rose significantly at the 10% level, 0.062% and 0.197% respectively. Research shows that the decline of subsidies for new en-ergy vehicles has a certain impact on air quality, which is a factor to be considered when formu-lating policies.
文章引用:张子晗. 新能源汽车补贴对空气质量的影响——以广东省为例[J]. 可持续发展, 2021, 11(4): 415-426. https://doi.org/10.12677/SD.2021.114051

参考文献

[1] 中国石油经济技术研究院. 2019年国内外油气行业发展报告[R]. 北京: 中国石油经济技术研究院, 2019.
[2] 生态环境部. 中国机动车环境管理年报(2019) [R]. 北京: 生态环境部, 2019.
[3] 袁建华. 环境污染、责任保险与机动车尾气排放治理: 自粤省观察[J]. 改革, 2012(8): 147-152.
[4] 金华冠. 汽车尾气污染及其控制技术[J]. 汽车博览, 2019(2): 42-43.
[5] Harris, A.M., Sempértegui, F., Estrella, B., Narváez, X., Egas, J., Woodin, M., et al. (2011) Air Pollution and Anemia as Risk Factors for Pneumonia in Ecuadorian Children: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Environmental Health, 10, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 石光, 周黎安, 郑世林, 张友国. 环境补贴与污染治理——基于电力行业的实证研究[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2016, 15(4): 1439-1462.
[7] Viard, V.B. and Fu, S. (2015) The Effect of Beijing's Driving Restrictions on Pollution and Economic Activity. Journal of Public Economics, 125, 98-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Chen, Y., Jin, G.Z., Kumar, N. and Guang, S. (2013) The Promise of Beijing: Evaluating the Impact of the 2008 Olympic Games on Air Quality. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66, 424-443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Barter, P.A. (2005) A Vehicle Quota Integrated with Road Usage Pricing: A Mechanism to Complete the Phase-Out of High Fixed Vehicle Taxes in Singapore. Transport Policy, 12, 525-536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Hao, H., Ou, X., Du, J., Wang, H. and Ouyang, M. (2014) China’s Electric Vehicle Subsidy Scheme: Rationale and Impacts. Energy Policy, 73, 722-732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 孙晓华, 徐帅. 政府补贴对新能源汽车购买意愿的影响研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 39(3): 8-16.
[12] 刘宏笪, 孙华平, 张茜. 中国新能源汽车产业政策演化及执行阻滞分析——兼论双积分政策的协同实施[J]. 管理现代化, 2019, 39(4): 41-46.
[13] 财政部. 四部委确定第一批新能源汽车推广应用城市或区域名单[Z]. 2013.
[14] 陈凡. 珠三角地区新能源汽车产业发展的比较研究[J]. 汽车工业研究, 2019(3): 17-20.
[15] 孙晓华, 刘小玲, 于润群. 城市规模、充电设施建设与新能源汽车市场培育[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(7): 111-121.