肢体残疾人的应对方式和坚毅在婚姻质量和适应性间的中介效应
The Relationship between Marriage Quality and Adaptability in Physically Disabled Persons: The Mediating Role of Coping Style and Grit
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2021.116181, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李庆洋, 卢 宁*, 刘 玎, 王春林:深圳大学应用心理学研究与咨询中心,广东 深圳
关键词: 肢体残疾人婚姻质量适应性应对方式坚毅中介效应Physically Disabled Persons Marriage Quality Adaptability Coping Style Grit Mediating Effect
摘要: 目的:了解肢体残疾人适应性、应对方式和坚毅特质、婚姻质量之间的相互关系,探索应对方式和坚毅人格特质在婚姻质量和适应性间的中介效应。方法:方便采样,对广东省广州市、深圳市、东莞市社区、残疾人康复中心、残疾人企业1570名肢体残疾人进行问卷施测(残疾人适应性量表、中国人婚姻质量量表、应对方式问卷和坚毅量表)。结果:① 婚姻质量与适应的相关分析:肢体残疾人婚姻质量量表总分及各维度得分与适应量表总分及各维度得分之间呈现显著正相关(r = 0.431~0.866) (p < 0.01),婚姻质量量表的夫妻交流、化解冲突、家庭角色维度与适应量表的人际适应维度相关程度较高(r = 0.769~0.866) (p < 0.01)。② 适应与应对方式的相关分析:适应量表总分及各维度得分与积极应对方式呈显著正相关(r = 0.496~0.822) (p < 0.01),其中环境适应与积极应对方式相关程度最高;适应量表总分及各维度得分与消极应对方式呈显著负相关(r = −0.474~−0.503) (p < 0.01)。③ 适应与坚毅的相关分析:适应量表总分及各维度得分与坚毅量表总分及其各维度得分呈显著正相关(r = 0.468~0.821) (p < 0.01),其中坚毅量表的坚毅努力维度与适应量表的生活适应维度、环境适应维度的相关程度较高(r = 0.821, r = 0.790)。④ 婚姻质量与应对方式的相关分析:婚姻质量量表及各维度与应对方式问卷的积极应对方式维度呈显著正相关(r = 0.561~0.813) (p < 0.01),而与消极应对方式呈显著负相关(r = −0.624~−0.823) (p < 0.01)。其中婚姻质量量表的夫妻交流、化解冲突维度与积极应对方式相关程度较高(r = 0.813, r = 0.795);婚姻质量量表中的经济安排、亲友关系、家庭角色维度与消极应对方式相关程度较高(r = −0.769~−0.823)。⑤ 婚姻质量与坚毅的相关分析:婚姻质量总分及各维度得分与坚毅总分及各维度得分呈正相关(r = 0.469~0.813) (p < 0.01),婚姻质量量表的家庭角色、生活观念维度与坚毅努力维度相关程度较高(r = 0.811, r = 0.801);婚姻质量量表的性格相容、业余活动、情感与性维度与坚毅兴趣维度相关程度较高(r = 0.803~0.813)。⑥ 中介效应分析:积极应对方式、坚毅特质分别在婚姻质量和适应性之间起部分中介作用。坚毅特质中介效应占总效应的比例为45.32%,积极应对方式中介效应占总效应的比例为34.80%。结论:积极应对方式和坚毅特质对于肢体残疾人的适应性有显著影响,并在婚姻质量和适应性之间发挥部分中介作用。婚姻质量直接影响肢体残疾人的适应性,也通过坚毅特质、积极应对方式间接影响肢体残疾人的适应性。
Abstract: Objective: To understand the relationship among adaptability, coping style, grit and marriage quality of physically disabled people, and to explore the mediating effect of coping style and grit between marriage quality and adaptability. Methods: A total of 1570 physically disabled people in communities, rehabilitation centers for the disabled and enterprises for the disabled in Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Dongguan, Guangdong Province were investigated by questionnaires (Disability Adaptation Scale, Chinese Marriage Quality Scale, Coping Style Questionnaire and grit Scale). Results: ① Correlation analysis between marriage quality and adaptation: There was a significant positive correlation between the total score and all dimensions of marriage quality scale and the total score and all dimensions of adaptation scale (r = 0.431~0.866) (p < 0.01). The marital communication, conflict resolution and family role dimensions of marriage quality scale were highly correlated with interpersonal adaptation dimensions of adaptation scale (r = 0.769~0.866) (p < 0.01). ② Correlation analysis of coping style and adaptation: Positive coping style was positively correlated with the total score of adaptation scale and the scores of each dimension (r = 0.496~0.822) (p < 0.01). Among them, the positive coping style had the highest correlation with environmental adaptation; negative coping style was negatively correlated with the total score of adaptation scale and the scores of each dimension (r = −0.474~−0.503) (p < 0.01). ③ Correlation analysis of grit and adaptation: The total scores of grit scale and its various dimensions were positively correlated with the total score of adaptation scale and its various dimensions (r = 0.468~0.821) (p < 0.01), and the grit effort dimension of grit scale had a higher correlation with the life adaptation dimension and the environment adaptation dimension of the adaptation scale (r = 0.821, r = 0.790). ④ Correlation analysis between marriage quality and coping style: Marriage quality scale and its dimensions were positively correlated with positive coping style dimension of coping style questionnaire (r = 0.561~0.813) (p < 0.01), but negatively correlated with negative coping style (r = −0.624~−0.823) (p < 0.01). Among them, the dimensions of marital communication, conflict resolution in the marital quality scale were highly correlated with positive coping styles (r = 0.813, r = 0.795); the dimensions of economic arrangement, relationship between relatives and friends, family role in marriage quality scale were highly correlated with negative coping style (r = −0.769~−0.823). ⑤ Correlation analysis between marriage quality and grit: The total scores of marriage quality and each dimension were positively correlated with the total score of grit and each dimension (r = 0.469~0.813) (p < 0.01), and the family role, life concept dimension and grit effort dimension were highly correlated (r = 0.811, r = 0.801); the dimensions of personality compatibility, spare time, emotion and sex were highly correlated with the dimension of grit interest (r = 0.803~0.813). ⑥ Mediating effect analysis: Positive coping style and grit play a partial me-diating role between marriage quality and adaptability. The mediation effect of grit accounts for 45.32% of the total effect. The mediating effect of positive coping style accounted for 34.80% of the total effect. Conclusion: Coping style and grit have a significant impact on the adaptability of physically disabled people, and play a partial intermediary role between marriage quality and adaptability. Marriage quality directly affects the adaptability of physically disabled people, and indirectly affects the adaptability of physically disabled people through grit and positive coping style. Keywords
文章引用:李庆洋, 卢宁, 刘玎, 王春林 (2021). 肢体残疾人的应对方式和坚毅在婚姻质量和适应性间的中介效应. 心理学进展, 11(6), 1618-1628. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.116181

参考文献

[1] 陈红光, 黄悦勤, 刘肇瑞, 马超, 张婷婷(2019). 肢体残疾人精神残疾共患率及其相关因素. 中国心理卫生杂志, 33(8), 571-576.
[2] 陈小萍, 张怡星(2019). 城市职业女性应对方式与婚姻质量关系研究. 智库时代, (30), 257-258.
[3] 陈玉珠(2014). 残疾人适应性量表的编制及研究. 硕士学位论文, 南昌: 江西师范大学.
[4] 戴晓阳(2015). 常用心理测量手册中修订版. 北京: 人民军医出版社.
[5] 第二次全国残疾人抽样调查领导小组(2006). 2006年第二次全国残疾人抽样调查主要数据公报. 中国康复理论与实践, 12(12), 1013-1013.
[6] 杜帅领, 朱艳丽(2019). 青少年坚毅人格自我控制能力与自我效能感的关系. 校园心理, 17(2), 83-86.
[7] 黄田艺, 陈定湾(2020). 杭州市肢体残疾人抑郁状况及相关因素分析. 医药前沿, 10(18), 249-250.
[8] 季元德, 魏钢焰(2012).大学生人格特征与社会适应性之关系. 浙江树人大学学报, 12(4), 81-86.
[9] 贾晓波(2001). 心理适应的本质与机制. 天津师范大学学报(社科版), (1), 19-23.
[10] 解亚宁(1998). 简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, (2), 114-115.
[11] 梁崴, 王丹丹, 张春青, 姒刚彦(2016). 简式毅力问卷在中国专业运动员和大学生运动员群体中的信效度检验. 中国运动医学杂志, 35(11), 1031-1037.
[12] 王厚亮, 刘破资, 黄开林(2003). 175例育龄妇女婚姻质量与个性、应对方式的相关分析. 中国计划生育杂志, 11(10), 608-611.
[13] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
[14] 谢娜, 王臻, 赵金龙(2017). 12项坚毅量表(12-item grit scale)的中文修订. 中国健康心理学杂志, 25(6), 893-896.
[15] 谢瑞红, 王志刚, 王哲, 范永春, 李雪红, 刘忠良(2012). 肢体残疾患者的心理健康状况评价与相关因素的研究现状. 中国伤残医学, (9), 121-125.
[16] Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.[CrossRef
[17] Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in Adulthood: A Six-Year Longitudinal Study of Self-Reports and Spouse Ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 853-863.[CrossRef
[18] Costa Jr., P. T., Zonderman, A. B., & McCrae, R. R. (1991). Personality, Defense, Coping and Adaptation in Adulthood. Life-Span Developmental Psychology (pp. 277-293). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Pub.
[19] Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and Passion for Long-Term Goals. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 92, 1087-1101.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Duckworth, A., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Self-Control and Grit: Related but Separable Determinants of Success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 319-325.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, P., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Survivor Mission: Do Those Who Survive Have a Drive to Thrive at Work? Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 209-218.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. I. (2002). Marital Research in the 20th Century and a Research Agenda for the 21st Century. Family Process, 41, 159-197.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The Longitudinal Course of Marital Quality and Stability: A Review of Theory, Methods, and Research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-8.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Meriac, J. P., Slifka, J. S., & LaBat, L. R. (2015). Work Ethic and Grit: An Examination of Empirical Redundancy. Personality & Individual Differences, 86, 401-405.[CrossRef
[25] Vainio, M. M., & Daukantaitė, D. (2016). Grit and Different Aspects of Well-Being: Direct and Indirect Relationships via Sense of Coherence and Authenticity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2119-2147.[CrossRef
[26] Vela, J. C., Lu, M. T. P., Lenz, S., & Hinojosa, K. (2015). Positive Psychology and Familial Factors as Predictors of Latina/o Students’ Psychological Grit. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 37, 287-303.[CrossRef
[27] West, M. R., Kraft, M. A., Finn, A. S., Martin, R. E., Duckworth, A. L., Gabrieli, C. F. O., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2016). Promise and Paradox: Measuring Students’ Non-Cognitive Skills and the Impact of Schooling. Educational Evaluation &Policy Analysis, 38, 148-170.[CrossRef