谦卑对领导有效性的作用机制探究:基于中日两个案例的比较分析
Research on the Function Mechanism of Humility to the Effectiveness of Leadership: Two Cases between China and Japan
DOI: 10.12677/MM.2021.117102, PDF,   
作者: 邓 强, 亢 书, 郭 斌:西南政法大学,商学院,重庆;殷诗渊:西南政法大学,行政法学院,重庆
关键词: 谦卑领导有效性作用机制Humility Leadership Effectiveness Functional Mechanism
摘要: 谦卑作为一种领导特质受到了学术界的广泛关注。本文运用案例研究来探究谦卑对领导有效性的作用机制。研究发现,谦卑对领导有效性的作用机制主要通过关系和学习两个层面影响领导职能活动的有效性。一方面,谦卑对于营造良好的组织氛围及建立和谐的组织成员关系有着很大的帮助,能够激发员工的工作热情、提高员工的工作满意度并降低员工离职率,有助于促进组织内部团结和增强员工组织认同,为企业创造经济价值;另一方面,谦卑型领导因其开放、包容、支持、纳言等特质,有利于营造创新的环境,提高组织的学习能力,促进组织的知识获取、知识共享以及知识利用及创新,并最终提高企业的绩效表现。
Abstract: Humility as a leadership trait has been widely concerned by the academic community. This paper uses a multi-case study to explore the role of humility in leadership effectiveness. It is found that the mechanism of humility on leadership effectiveness mainly affects the effectiveness of leadership activities through relationship and learning. On the one hand, humility is of great help to create a good organizational atmosphere and build a harmonious relationship among the members of the organization. It can stimulate employees’ work enthusiasm, improve employees’ job satisfaction and reduce employee turnover rate. On the other hand, the humble leadership is conducive to creating an environment of innovation because of its characteristics such as openness, inclusiveness, support and openness, improving organizational learning ability, promoting knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing, knowledge utilization and innovation, and ultimately improving the performance of enterprises.
文章引用:邓强, 亢书, 殷诗渊, 郭斌. 谦卑对领导有效性的作用机制探究:基于中日两个案例的比较分析[J]. 现代管理, 2021, 11(7): 807-818. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2021.117102

参考文献

[1] 王雪婷. 谦卑型领导对员工帮助行为的影响机制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2019.
[2] 齐蕾, 邢讷, 刘冰. “上有所好,下必甚焉?”——谦卑领导对员工反馈寻求行为影响机制[J]. 东岳论丛, 2017, 38(9): 167-176.
[3] 王勇. “管理方格论”简评[J]. 领导科学, 2012(7): 52-53.
[4] 崔晓林, 胡世杰, 李姗姗. 领导者的愤怒表达对领导有效性的影响分析与模型构建[J]. 领导科学, 2019(12): 50-53.
[5] 李莹华. 权变理论与有效领导之洞见[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2008, 10(2): 169-171.
[6] 罗瑾琏, 花常花, 钟竞. 谦卑型领导对知识员工创造力的影响及作用机制研究: 一个被中介的调节模型——基于社会认知的视角[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2016, 28(4): 106-116.
[7] 范乐乐. 谦卑型领导对组织绩效的影响研究: 组织认同感与组织创造力的多重中介模型[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2016.
[8] Ou, A.Y., Tsui, A.S., Kinicki, A.J., Waldman, D.A., Xiao, Z. and Song, L.J. (2014) Humble Chief Executive Officers’ Connections to Top Management Team Integration and Middle Managers’ Responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 34-72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Ou, A.Y., Waldman, D.A. and Peterson, S.J. (2015) Do Humble CEOs Matter? An Examination of CEO Humility and Firm Outcomes. Journal of Management, 44, 1147-1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Amabile, T.M. (1988) A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
[11] 雷星晖, 单志汶, 苏涛永, 杨元飞. 谦卑型领导行为对员工创造力的影响研究[J]. 管理科学, 2015, 28(2): 115-125.
[12] Mesmer-Magnus, J.R. and DeChurch, L.A. (2009) Information Sharing and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535-546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 杜军, 费卉卉, 李沫, 焦媛媛. 跨国公司海外R&D机构区位选择过程影响因素研究[J]. 管理学报, 2011, 8(5): 683-690.
[14] 杨维. 儒家思想在企业文化建设中的运用——以日本企业京瓷为例[J]. 国际公关, 2019(7): 211.
[15] 胡梨花, 刘骏. 公共合约观视角下的会计信息有用性探析[J]. 企业经济, 2018(12): 98-102.
[16] 翟正. 从日本京瓷企业文化看陶瓷类企业的长寿之道[J]. 佛山陶瓷, 2016, 26(11): 40-44.
[17] 稻盛和夫. 把萧条看作再发展的飞跃台[N]. 中国会计报, 2020-11-20(005).
[18] 尹晓磊. 企业制度与企业文化——京瓷公司内部管理制度分析[J]. 日本学论坛, 2005(2): 61-64.