基于跳跃波动溢出网络的中国股票市场重要节点分析
Analysis of Important Nodes in China’s Stock Market Based on Jump Volatility Spillover Networks
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2021.108275, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 胡栩彬, 熊寿遥, 仝青山*:长沙理工大学数学与统计学院,湖南 长沙
关键词: 股票市场跳跃波动复杂网络重要节点Stock Market Jump Volatility Complex Network Important Nodes
摘要: 对股票市场中重要节点识别及其影响因素分析是金融风险管理的热门话题之一。针对此,本文首先根据中国A股市场5分钟高频数据提取跳跃波动,运用格兰杰因果检验方法构建跳跃波动溢出网络;然后,针对网络中的5种中心性指标,通过主成分分析法构建复合指标测度网络中重要节点;最后,运用面板数据回归模型考察影响重要节点的因素。研究发现:1) 福星股份、上海机电、长春高新等是股票网络中的重要节点。2) 70%的重要节点具有较大市值,与“大而不能倒”的理念相吻合。另一方面,有30%市值较小的节点在跳跃波动网络中也扮演着重要角色,这也意味着不能忽视“太关联而不能倒”。3) 市值、市盈率、账面市值比越大,换手率越小的股票,在网络中往往越重要。
Abstract: The identification of important nodes in the stock market and the analysis of their influencing factors are one of hot topics in financial risk management. To achieve this purpose, this paper first extracts jump volatility in the Chinese A-share market by using intraday 5-minute high-frequency data and uses the Granger causality test to construct a jump volatility spillover network. Then, five network centrality metrics are used to construct a comprehensive index to measure the important node. Finally, we identify the major factors, which affect the important nodes with panel data regression analysis. The research found that: 1) Hubei Fuxing Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai Mechanical & Electrical Industry Co., Ltd., and Changchun High and New Technology Industries (Group) Inc. are important nodes in the stock network. 2) 70% of important nodes have a large market value, reflecting the risk of “too big to fail”. On the other hand, 30% of nodes with a small market capitalization also play an important role in the jump and volatility network, which also means that the risk of “too relevant to fail” cannot be ignored. 3) Network nodes with larger market value, higher price-earnings ratio, higher book-to-market value ratio, and lower turnover rate tend to have stronger importance.
文章引用:胡栩彬, 熊寿遥, 仝青山. 基于跳跃波动溢出网络的中国股票市场重要节点分析[J]. 应用数学进展, 2021, 10(8): 2648-2659. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2021.108275

参考文献

[1] Wang, Z., Gao, X., An, H., Tang, R. and Sun, Q. (2020) Identifying Influential Energy Stocks Based on Spillover Network. International Review of Financial Analysis, 68, Article ID: 101277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Tumminello, M., Aste, T., Di Matteo, T. and Mantegna, R.N. (2005) A Tool for Filtering Information in Complex Systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 10421-10426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Tumminello, M., Lillo, F. and Mantegna, R.N. (2010) Correlation, Hierarchies, and Networks in Financial Markets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75, 40-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Chi, K.T., Liu, J. and Lau, F.C.M. (2010) A Network Perspective of the Stock Market. Journal of Empirical Finance, 17, 659-667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Yang, X., Wen, S., Zhao, X. and Huang, C. (2020) Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions: A Complex Network Perspective. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 545, Article ID: 123448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 欧阳红兵, 刘晓东. 中国金融机构的系统重要性及系统性风险传染机制分析——基于复杂网络的视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10):30-37.
[7] Mantegna, R.N. (1999) Hierarchical Structure in Financial Markets. The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 11, 193-197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Kenett, D.Y., Tumminello, M., Madi, A., Gur-Gershgoren, G., Mantegna, R.N. and Ben-Jacob, E. (2010) Dominating Clasp of the Financial Sector Revealed by Partial Correlation Analysis of the Stock Market. PLoS ONE, 5, e15032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 谢赤, 边慧东, 王纲金. 牛熊市视角下股票关联网络动态拓扑结构研究——以上证50指数为例[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(1): 66-74.
[10] Wen, F., Yang, X. and Zhou, W.X. (2019) Tail Dependence Networks of Global Stock Markets. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24, 558-567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Huang, C., Zhao, X., Su, R., Yang, X. and Yang, X. (2020) Dynamic Network Topology and Market Performance: A Case of Chinese Stock Market. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 1-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Huang, C., Wen, S., Li, M., Wen, F. and Yang, X. (2020) An Empirical Evaluation of the Influential Nodes for Stock Market Network: Chinese A Shares Case. Finance Research Letters, 38, Article ID: 101517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 陶利斌, 方兆本, 潘婉彬. 中国股市高频数据中的周期性和长记忆性[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2004, 24(6): 26-32.
[14] 陈国进, 丁杰, 赵向琴. “好”的不确定性, “坏”的不确定性与股票市场定价——基于中国股市高频数据分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019(7): 174-190.
[15] 陈国进, 王占海. 我国股票市场连续性波动与跳跃性波动实证研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(9): 1554-1562.
[16] 郭文旌, 邓明光, 董琦. 重大事件下中国股市的跳跃特征[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(2): 308-316.
[17] Bu, H., Tang, W. and Wu, J. (2019) Time-Varying Comovement and Changes of Comovement Structure in the Chinese Stock Market: A Causal Network Method. Economic Modelling, 81, 181-204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Andersen, T.G., Dobrev, D. and Schaumburg, E. (2012) Jump-Robust Volatility Estimation Using Nearest Neighbor Truncation. Journal of Econometrics, 169, 75-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Gong, X., Wen, F., Xia, X.H., Huang, J. and Pan, B. (2017) Investigating the Risk-Return Trade-off for Crude Oil Futures Using High-Frequency Data. Applied Energy, 196, 152-161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Corsi, F., Pirino, D., Reno, R. and Bipower, T. (2010) Variation and the Impact of Jumps on Volatility Forecasting. Journal of Econometrics, 159, 276-288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Zheng, Q. and Song, L. (2018) Dynamic Contagion of Systemic Risks on Global Main Equity Markets Based on Granger Causality Networks. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2018, Article ID: 9461870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Huang, W. and Wang, D. (2018) A Return Spillover Network Perspective Analysis of Chinese Financial Institutions’ Systemic Importance. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 509, 405-421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] 苏仁礼. 沪深A股网络拓扑结构变化与市场现象研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2020.