时间距离对自我–他人决策偏好的影响
The Effect of Time Distance on Self-Other Decision Preference
摘要: 解释水平理论认为,自我–他人决策差异的出现是因为人们在对事物进行表征时具有不同的解释水平,而这种解释水平的不同是由于觉察者和目标之间的心理距离不同。本研究选择了心理距离的其中一个维度——时间距离,并探究了在不同时间距离和选项条件下,人们的决策是否存在认知偏好上的差异。实验一探究了时间距离对自我–他人决策差异的影响,实验二验证了在不同时间距离下,人们决策对象的不同会使得人们对“价值”和“可行性”两个维度的偏好不同。结果发现,在不同时间距离下,为自己决策和为他人决策之间存在差异,同一选项在时间距离较远时会具有较小的吸引力;当价值和可行性发生冲突时,决策对象的不同会使得人们在“价值–可行性”两个维度上的偏好不同,为他人决策的被试会更注重选项的价值,并且时间距离的延长也会使得被试更注重价值高的选项。这表明,时间距离是影响自我–他人决策偏好的重要因素。
Abstract: As the construal level theory believes, the difference in self-other decision making occurs because people have different construal levels when representing things, and this difference is due to the psychological distance between the perceiver and the target. This research selects one of the psychological distance—temporal-distance, and explores whether there are differences in cognitive preferences in people’s decision-making under different time distances and options. Experiment 1 explored the influence of temporal-distance on self-other decision making differences. Experiment 2 verified that under different temporal distances, different decision-making subjects will lead to different preferences for the two dimensions of desirability and feasibility. The result shows that there is a difference between decision-making for oneself and for others at different time-distances, and the same option will have less attraction when the time-distance is much longer. When desirability and feasibility conflict, different decision-making subjects will make people have different preferences in the two dimensions of “desirability-feasibility”. Participants who make decisions for others will pay more attention to the value of options. With the time distance extends, the subjects pay more attention to the high-desirability options.
文章引用:蔡滢, 孙天义. 时间距离对自我–他人决策偏好的影响[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2021, 10(8): 2250-2259. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2021.108313

参考文献

[1] Hans, H. (1985) The Principal-Agent Problem with a Satisficing Agent. North-Holland, 6, 359-379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 张春霖. 存在道德风险的委托代理关系:理论分析及其应用中的问题[J]. 经济研究, 1995(8): 3-8.
[3] 陈雪娜. 自我与他人不同决策角色对偏好反转的诱发[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2008.
[4] 徐惊蛰, 谢晓非. 解释水平视角下的自己-他人决策差异[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(1): 11-20.
[5] Trope, Y. and Liberman, N. (2010) Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., et al. (2006) Construal Levels and Self-Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351-367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Liviatan, I., Trope, Y. and Liberman, N. (2008) Interpersonal Similarity as a Social Distance Dimension: Implications for Perception of Others’ Actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256-1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Trope, Y., Liberman, N. and Wakslak, C. (2007) Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 83-95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Khan, U., Zhu, M. and Kalra, A. (2011) When Trade-Offs Matter: The Effect of Choice Construal on Context Effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 62-71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] White, K., Macdonnell, R. and Dahl, D.W. (2011) It’s the Mind-Set That Matters: The Role of Construal Level and Message Framing in Influencing Consumer Efficacy and Conservation Behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 472-485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 柴俊武, 赵广志, 何伟. 解释水平对品牌联想和品牌延伸评估的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(2): 175-187.
[12] 陈海贤, 何贵兵. 识解水平对跨期选择和风险选择的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(4): 442-452.
[13] Liberman, N. and Trope, Y. (1998) The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Rogers, T. and Bazerman, M.H. (2008) Future Lock-In: Future Implementation Increases Selection of ‘Should’ Choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 1-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Trope, Y. and Liberman, N. (2000) Temporal Construal and Time-Dependent Changes in Preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876-889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Zhao, M., Hoeffler, S. and Zauberman, G. (2007) Mental Simulation and Preference Consistency over Time: The Role of Process-Versus Outcome-Focused Thoughts. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 379-388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Ashford, S.J. and Tsui, A.S. (1991) Self-Regulation for Managerial Effectiveness: The Role of Active Feedback Seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 251-280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Kray, L. and Gonzalez, R. (1999) Differential Weighting in Choice versus Advice: I’ll Do This, You Do That. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 207-218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 杨慧. 自我—他人决策差异[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2013.
[20] Aron, A., Aron, E.N. and Smollan, D. (1992) Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the Structure of Interpersonal Closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 刘永芳, 毕玉芳, 王怀勇. 情绪和任务框架对自我和预期他人决策时风险偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2010(3): 317-324.