大学生主观环境知识、环境态度与亲环境行为的关系
The Relationship between Subjective Environmental Knowledge, Environmental Attitude and Pro-Environmental Behavior of University Students
摘要: 当前关于不同类型环境知识的研究多为客观环境知识,较少关注主观环境知识。本文为考察大学生不同类型主观环境知识与环境态度、亲环境行为之间的关系,首先自编大学生主观环境知识量表并检验其信效度,再结合新生态范式量表的人类例外范式、新生态范式两个环境态度维度,大学生亲环境行为的循环利用、购买消费行为两个维度进行研究。结果表明:大学生主观环境知识包含日常环境知识、专业环境知识两个维度,前者正向预测人类例外范式及购买消费行为,后者负向预测人类例外范式,同时正向预测循环利用与购买消费行为;此外,新生态范式在主观日常环境知识、购买消费行为之间起部分中介作用。未来的环境教育既需强化日常生活领域知识,也应定期传授科学、准确的专业知识。
Abstract: At present, the studies on different types of environmental knowledge are mostly objective envi-ronmental knowledge, little attention is paid to subjective environmental knowledge. In order to investigate the relationship between environmental knowledge, environmental attitude and pro- environmental behavior of university students, firstly a scale of university students’ subjective environmental knowledge was developed and its reliability and validity were tested. Then, its relationship with the two dimensions of environmental attitude of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale (the human exceptional paradigm and the new ecological paradigm) and the two dimensions of the University Students’ Pro-environmental Behavior Questionnaire (the recycling behavior and the buying and consuming behavior) were studied. The results show that the subjective environmental knowledge of university students includes two dimensions: daily environmental know- ledge and professional environmental knowledge. The former positively predicts the human exception paradigm and the buying and consuming behavior, while the latter negatively predicts the human exception paradigm and positively predicts the recycling behavior and the buying and consuming behavior. In addition, the new ecological paradigm plays a partial mediating role between subjective daily environmental knowledge and the buying and consuming behavior. Future environmental education should not only strengthen the knowledge in the field of daily life, but also regularly impart scientific and accurate professional knowledge.
文章引用:唐长江, 林彤, 王翔, 张雯琪, 李欣睿, 孙世月 (2021). 大学生主观环境知识、环境态度与亲环境行为的关系. 心理学进展, 11(9), 2152-2163. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.119244

参考文献

[1] 蔡美萍(2013). 大学生生态文明教育的现状分析及实践路径探讨. 江苏高教, (4), 83-84.
[2] 段文杰, 盛君榕, 慕文龙, 关远(2017). 环境知识异质性与环保行为. 科学决策, (10), 49-74.
[3] 洪大用, 范叶超(2016). 公众环境知识测量: 一个本土量表的提出与检验. 中国人民大学学报, 30(4), 110-121.
[4] 刘贤伟, 邹洋(2017). 青年群体生态价值观的结构、现状与特点——基于我国10个城市的实证研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 31(9), 7-13.
[5] 刘艳华(2009). 论大学生生态环保意识及行为习惯的培养. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 8(1), 104-107.
[6] 沈立军(2008). 大学生环境价值观、环境态度和环境行为的特点及关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 太原: 山西大学.
[7] 汤竹喧(2015). 环保行为中的许可效应研究. 硕士学位论文, 南京: 南京大学.
[8] 吴建平, 訾非, 刘贤伟, 王广新, 杨智辉, 李明, 叶柳红, 姜金花, 李秋玲(2012). 新生态范式的测量: NEP量表在中国的修订及应用. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 11(4), 8-13.
[9] 薛嘉欣, 刘满芝, 赵忠春, 李宗波(2019). 亲环境行为的概念与形成机制: 基于拓展的MOA模型. 心理研究, 12(2), 144-153.
[10] 张新海, 崔雨(2019). 论基于后现代知识观的基础教育课程改革走向. 商丘师范学院学报, 35(11), 86-90.
[11] Aertsens, J., Mondelaers, K., Verbeke, W., Buysse, J., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2011). The Influence of Subjective and Objective Knowledge on Attitude, Motivations and Consumption of Organic Food. British Food Journal, 113, 1353-1378.[CrossRef
[12] Carlson, J., Vincent, L., Hardesty, D., & Bearden, W. (2009). Objective and Subjective Knowledge Relationships: A Quantitative Analysis of Consumer Research Findings. Journalof Consumer Research, 35, 864-876.[CrossRef
[13] Casaló, L. V., Escario, J., & Rodriguez-Sanchez, C. (2019). Analyzing Differences between Different Types of Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Do Attitude Intensity and Type of Knowledge Matter? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 56-64.[CrossRef
[14] Cheng, T., & Wu, H. C. (2015). How Do Environmental Knowledge, Environmental Sensitivity, and Place Attachment Affect Environmentally Responsible Behavior? An Integrated Approach for Sustainable Island Tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23, 557-576.[CrossRef
[15] Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the Detection of Carelessly Invalid Responses in Survey Data. Journalof Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4-19.[CrossRef
[16] Díaz-Siefer, P., Neaman, A., Salgado, E., Celis-Diez, J., & Otto, S. (2015). Human-Environment System Knowledge: A Correlate of Pro-Environmental Behavior. Sustainability, 7, 15510-15526.[CrossRef
[17] Dunlap, R. E. (2008). The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 3-18.[CrossRef
[18] Ellen, P. S. (1994). Do We Know What We Need to Know? Objective and Subjective Knowledge Effects on Pro-Ecological Behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 30, 43-52.[CrossRef
[19] Fornell, & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 375-381.[CrossRef
[20] Frantz, C. M., & Mayer, F. S. (2014). The Importance of Connection to Nature in Assessing Environmental Education Programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 85-89.[CrossRef
[21] Frick, J., Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental Knowledge and Conservation Behavior: Exploring Prevalence and Structure in a Representative Sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1597-1613.[CrossRef
[22] Geiger, S. M., Geiger, M., & Wilhelm, O. (2019). Environ-ment-Specific vs. General Knowledge and Their Role in Pro- Environmental Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 718.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., &Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1-8.[CrossRef
[24] Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 99-114.[CrossRef
[25] Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U. (2003). Ecological Behavior’s Dependency on Different Forms of Knowledge. Applied Psychology, 52, 598-613.[CrossRef
[26] Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro- Environmental Behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239-260.[CrossRef
[27] Nelson, B., Taylor, D., & Strick, S. (2009). Wine Consumers’ Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes: Influence on Willingness to Purchase. International Journal of Wine Research, 1, 59-72.[CrossRef
[28] Preacher, K. J., & Coffman, D. L. (2006, May). Computing Power and Minimum Sample Size for RMSEA [Computer Software]. http://quantpsy.org
[29] Siegel, L., Cut-ter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A., & Bellert, A. (2018). Still “Minding the Gap” Sixteen Years Later: (Re)Storying Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 34, 189-203.[CrossRef
[30] Wang, R., Jia, T., Qi, R., Cheng, J., Zhang, K., Wang, E., & Wang, X. (2021). Differentiated Impact of Politics- and Science- Oriented Education on Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Case Study of Chinese University Students. Sustainability, 13, 616.[CrossRef
[31] Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Young Consumers’ Intention towards Buying Green Products in a Developing Nation: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journalof Cleaner Production, 135, 732-739.[CrossRef
[32] Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Chen, Q., & John, D. S. A. E. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. The Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197-206.[CrossRef