一体化编码对老年人联结记忆和项目记忆的权衡性影响
The Trade-Off Effect of Unitization Coding on Association Memory and Item Memory in Older Adults
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2021.119245, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 于 傲:山东师范大学心理学院,山东 济南;山东省莱西市实验小学,山东 青岛;毛伟宾*, 和 晓:山东师范大学心理学院,山东 济南
关键词: 联结记忆项目记忆一体化编码老年人感觉通道Associative Memory Item Memory Unitization Older Adults Modality
摘要: 目的:探究一体化编码在提高老年人联结记忆成绩的同时,是否会对其项目记忆产生损害。方法:本研究采用2 × 2的混合实验设计,选取41名60岁以上的老年人参与实验,将被试分为使用编码策略和不使用编码策略两组,采用不同通道的实验材料,通过联结再认范式进行研究,探究一体化编码策略对老年人联结记忆和项目记忆的影响。结果:无论是项目再认还是联结再认,老年人在使用一体化编码策略条件下的再认正确率均高于不使用一体化编码策略条件;老年人的项目再认正确率高于联结再认正确率;在项目记忆成绩上,老年人对图片–图片对中图片项目的再认正确率显著高于对声音–图片对中声音项目的再认正确率;而且在使用一体化编码的条件下,对于图片–图片对材料,老年人的项目再认正确率显著高于联结再认正确率。结论:无论是跨通道的材料还是相同通道的材料,进行意义联想的一体化编码策略在提高老年人联结记忆的同时,也会提高项目记忆。
Abstract: Objective: To explore how unitization encoding influence the associative memory and item memory performance in older adults. Methods: A 2 × 2 mixed experimental design was conducted in the present experiment. Forty-one elders over 60 years old were divided into two groups: using coding strategy and not using coding strategy. The present experiment used the association recognition paradigm to explore the effect of unitization coding on associative memory and item memory in elders by using pictures and sounds from different modalities as experiment materials. Results: Regardless of item recognition or associative recognition, the recognition accuracy of the older adults with the unitization encoding strategy was higher than that without the unitization encoding strategy. The item recognition accuracy of the older adults is higher than that of the associative recognition. The item recognition accuracy of the elders for the pictuers-pictuers pairs, is higher than that for the sounds-pictures pairs. Under the condition of unitization encoding, for the pictuers-pictuers pairs, the item recognition accuracy of the elders is higher than the associative recognition accuracy. Conclusion: The unitization encoding strategy improved both associative memory and item memory in the older adults, regardless of item pairs are from cross-modality or the same modality.
文章引用:于傲, 毛伟宾, 和晓 (2021). 一体化编码对老年人联结记忆和项目记忆的权衡性影响. 心理学进展, 11(9), 2164-2171. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.119245

参考文献

[1] 刘泽军, 王余娟, 郭春彦(2019). 从整合的角度看联结记忆中的项目再认. 心理科学进展, 27(3), 490-498.
[2] 杨文洁, 邵伟波(2015). 正常老年人双字词记忆广度测试特点的研究. 见 中华医学会、中华医学会神经病学分会. 第四届全国痴呆与认知障碍学术研讨会及高级讲授班论文汇编(p. 1). 北京: 中华医学会.
[3] 赵梦阳, 郭若宇, 毛伟宾, 赵参参(2019). 增龄性联结记忆损伤及其影响因素. 心理科学进展, 27(10), 1677-1686.
[4] 郑志伟, 李娟, 肖凤秋(2015) . 熟悉性能够支持联结记忆: 一体化编码的作用. 心理科学进展, 23(2), 202-212.
[5] Ahmad, F. N., & Hockley, W. E. (2014). The Role of Familiarity in Associative Recognition of Unitized Compound Word Pairs. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2301-232.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Ahmad, F. N., Fernandes, M., & Hockley, W. E. (2015). Improving Associative Memory in Older Adults with Unitization. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22, 452-472.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Chalfonte, B. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature Memory and Binding in Young and Older Adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403-416.[CrossRef
[8] Diana, R. A., Yonelinas, A. P, & Ranganath, C. (2007). Imaging Recollection and Familiarity in the Medial Temporal Lobe: A Three-Component Model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 379-386.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Eichenbaum, H., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2007). The Medial Temporal Lobe and Recognition Memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 123-152.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1989). Unitization and Grouping Mediate Dissociations in Memory for New Associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 930-940.[CrossRef
[11] Hockley, W. E., & Cristi, C. (1996). Tests of Encoding Tradeoffs between Item and Associative Information. Memory & Cognition, 24, 202-216.[CrossRef
[12] Murray, B. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2012). The Effects of Emotion and Encoding Strategy on Associative Memory. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1056-1069.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult Age Differences in Memory Performance: Tests of an Associative Deficit Hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1170-1187.[CrossRef
[14] Naveh-Benjamin, M., Brav, T. K., & Levy, O. (2007). The Associative Memory Deficit of Older Adults: The Role of Strategy Utilization. Psychology and Aging, 22, 202-208.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Naveh-Benjamin, M., Hussain, Z., Guez, J., & Bar-On, M. (2003). Adult Age Differences in Episodic Memory: Further Support for an Associative-Deficit Hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 826-837.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Old, S. R., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2008). Differential Effects of Age on Item and Associative Measures of Memory: A Meta-Analysis. Psychology and Aging, 23, 104-118.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Parks, C. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2015). The Importance of Unitization for Familiarity-Based Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 881-903.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Pilgrim, L. K., Murray, J. G., & Donaldson, D. I. (2012). Characterizing Episodic Memory Retrieval: Electrophysiological Evidence for Diminished Familiarity Following Unitization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1671-1681.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential Effects of Aging on Memory for Content and Context: A Meta-Analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 527-539.[CrossRef
[20] Tibon, R., Ben-Zvi, S., & Levy, D. A. (2014). Associative Recognition Processes Are Modulated by Modality Relations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 1785-1796.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Tibon, R., Gronau, N., & Levy, D. A. (2017). Associative Unitization via Semantic Relatedness Benefits Episodic Recognition of Component Elements. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/cjxse[CrossRef
[22] Zheng, Z. W., Li, J., Xiao, F. Q., Ren, W. C., & He, R. Q. (2016). Unitization Improves Source Memory in Older Adults: An Event-Related Potential Study. Neuropsychologia, 89, 232-244.[CrossRef] [PubMed]