液态战略:数字经济环境下的中小企业竞争战略选择
Liquid Strategy: Competitive Strategy Choices of SMEs in Digital Economic Environment
摘要: 中小企业一直是市场竞争中的弱势群体,而数字技术提供了新的机会,一大批弱势群体因此具有了前所未有的竞争力,但它们中的很多企业未能延续这种状况。2020年以来的新冠疫情更使企业无所适从。中小企业迫切需要新的思想或方法论来指导自己的竞争战略选择,但是数字技术带来的新的竞争环境特征和竞争方式,使得传统的竞争战略理论难以为企业的生存和竞争提供有效指导。本文基于对数字环境竞争方式特征的分析,认为数字技术加剧了市场环境的不确定性,瞬时优势特征使得企业需要频繁切换或建构新的竞争优势,生态化的数字平台是最主体的竞争策略方向,“连接”构成了新的资源能力。依据动态能力理论和社交资本理论,本文提出了液态战略,中小企业可以通过选择加入不同的生态平台,构建自己的价值链网络系统,通过自我虚拟生态系统建构自己的商业生态,基于社会资本的社群机制创新商业模式,从而建构自己的动态能力和商业资本。
Abstract: SMEs (Small and Medium-sized Enterprises) have long been the Disadvantaged Group in competitive market, but digital technology provided new chances for them. Large population in this Disadvantaged Group gained huge competitiveness that has never had before, among which a large group of companies have failed to keep their ongoing competitiveness, and a large group of new companies have kept emerging in the midst of development of digital technology. It makes enterprise more disoriented since the outbreak of COVID-19 in 2020. SMEs urgently need new thought and methodology to guide their strategic competitive choices. But old and traditional competitive strategy theories face huge challenges, might not be able to provide useful guidance while encountering with new competitive environment and model brought by digital technology. Based on the analysis of competitive features in competitive environment, this paper said that ecological digital platform is the most important competitive strategic direction. The feature of instant advantage asks enterprises to change or build up new competitive advantage frequently, and “connection” becomes a new power of resources. Based on dynamic capability theory and social capital theory, this paper puts forward liquid strategy, by which SMEs can join in different ecological digital platforms to build up their own business system and network system of value chain, further to build up their own business ecological system by self-construal virtual ecosystem, eventually to build up their own dynamic capabilities and business capital.
文章引用:李江予. 液态战略:数字经济环境下的中小企业竞争战略选择[J]. 现代管理, 2021, 11(9): 1037-1045. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2021.119129

参考文献

[1] 托德•岑格. 你的公司有理论吗? [J/OL]. 哈佛商业评论. https://www.hbrchina.org/2013-06-05/1246.html, 2013-06-05.
[2] Burke, K. (2011) The Impact of Firm Size on Inter-net Use in Small Businesses. Electronic Markets, 15, 79-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 阿里巴巴. 中国淘宝村发展报告(2014-2018) [R]. 南京: 南京大学空间规划研究中心, 阿里新乡村研究中心, 2018. https://i.aliresearch.com/img/20181216/20181216145248.pdf, 2018-12-16.
[4] 世界银行. 2016年世界发展报告: 数字红利[R]. 华盛顿哥伦比亚特区: 世界银行, 2016. http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/845911452690992379/WDR2016MainMessages-CHINESE-WebRes.pdf, 2016-01-14
[5] UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (2017) Information Economy Re-port 2017. United Nations, Geneva. https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ier2017_en.pdf
[6] IBM价值研究院. 紧跟客户的感觉 数字化重塑的终级目标[R/OL]. https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/WJ641OWY, 2017-12-21.
[7] Kaivo-oja, J.R.L. and Lauraeus, I.T. (2018) The VUCA Approach as a Solution Concept to Corporate Foresight Challenges and Global Technological Disruption. Fore-sight, 20, 27-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 任正非不知华为融资300亿 称华为资金十分宽裕[EB/OL]. http://www.chinaz.com/sees/2019/0927/1051160.shtml, 2019-09-27.
[9] 丽塔•麦格拉思. 瞬时竞争优势[J/OL]. 哈佛商业评论. https://www.hbrchina.org/2013-06-05/1245.html, 2013-06-05.
[10] 奥马尔•阿布什, 拉里•唐斯. 企业应开始为5G做准备[J/OL]. 哈佛商业评论. https://www.hbrchina.org/2019-06-05/7316.html, 2019-06-05.
[11] UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (2019) Digital Economy Report 2019 (Overview). United Nations, Geneva. https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/der2019_overview_en.pdf
[12] 迈克尔•加可拜. 生态系统经济企业战略选择[J/OL]. 哈佛商业评论. https://www.hbrchina.org/2019-10-11/7536.html, 2019-10-11.
[13] 苏治, 荆文君, 孙宝文. 分层式垄断竞争_互联网行业市场结构特征研究[J]. 管理世界, 2018(4): 80-188.
[14] 李怀, 高良谋. 新经济的冲击与竞争性垄断市场结构的出现——观察微软案例的一个理论框架[J]. 经济研究, 2001(10): 29-37.
[15] 凯文·凯利. 必然[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2018.
[16] 北京大学国家发展研究院. 陈春花: 跨界时代的管理进化[EB/OL]. https://www.nsd.pku.edu.cn/sylm/gd/257972.htm, 2018-09-04.
[17] 陈春花, 廖建文. 顾客主义: 数字化时代的战略逻辑[J]. 哈佛商业评论. https://www.hbrchina.org/2019-01-02/7077.html, 2019-01-02.
[18] 迈克尔•瑞尔. 新竞争战略崛起[J/OL]. 哈佛商业评论. https://www.hbrchina.org/2013-06-05/1248.html, 2013-06-05.
[19] 张凤海. 动态能力对新企业绩效的影响机理研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2013.
[20] 胥家硕. 动态能力、制度与企业绩效的关联性研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 吉林: 吉林大学, 2011.
[21] Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 万倩雯, 卫田, 刘杰. 弥合社会资本鸿沟: 构建企业社会创业家与金字塔底层个体间的合作关系——基于LZ农村电商项目的单案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(5): 179-196.
[23] 王金杰, 牟韶红, 盛玉雪. 电子商务有益于农村居民创业吗?——基于社会资本的视角[J]. 经济管理与研究, 2019, 40(2): 95-110.
[24] Burt, R.S. (1997) The Contingent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Inkpen, A.C. and Tsang, E.W.K. (2005) Social Capital, Networks and Knowledge Transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30, 146-165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998) Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Tiwana, A. (2008) Do Bridging Ties Complement Strong Ties? An Empirical Examination of Alliance Ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 251-272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Prieto, I.M. and Easterby-Smith, M. (2006) Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Organizational Knowledge: An Exploration. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 500-510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] 尼古拉斯•克里斯塔基斯, 詹姆斯•富勒. 大链接[M]. 北京: 北京联合出版公司, 2017.