工作经验、知识共享与团队创新绩效——基于红皇后竞争理论
Work Experience, Knowledge Sharing and Team Innovation Performance—Based on Red Queen Theory
摘要: 知识共享是创新绩效的重要影响变量,现有知识共享前因研究多聚焦于社会资本等产生的影响,知识源方面的前因研究十分有限。基于红皇后竞争理论,本文研究了工作经验作为知识共享前因变量对团队创新绩效的影响,并探索知识共享对团队创新绩效的影响路径。通过对在团队中作业的员工进行问卷调查,回收422份有效问卷,进行实证分析。结果显示工作经验正向影响团队创新绩效,知识共享在其中发挥中介作用,团队学习在知识共享与团队创新绩效的影响中发挥中介作用。本研究拓展了红皇后竞争理论的运用边界,对于人力资源实践具有一定的现实意义。
Abstract: Knowledge sharing is one of the most critical variables influencing innovation performance sig-nificantly. Existing researches on the antecedent variables of knowledge sharing mostly focus on the social capital. Researches on the relationship between knowledge sources and knowledge sharing are very limited. Based on the Red Queen Theory, this paper studies the influence of work experience as the antecedent variable of knowledge sharing on team innovation performance, and explores the influence of knowledge sharing on team innovation performance. By questionnaire survey to employees working in the team, 422 valid questionnaires were collected for empirical analysis. The results show that work experience affects team innovation performance positively, knowledge sharing plays a mediating role in the influence of the work experience on team innovation performance, and team learning plays a mediating role in the influence of knowledge sharing on team innovation performance. This study expands the application boundary of the Red Queen competition theory, and has certain significance for human resources.
文章引用:严良, 杨智仪, 邹林凤, 付明霞 (2021). 工作经验、知识共享与团队创新绩效——基于红皇后竞争理论. 心理学进展, 11(12), 2683-2693. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.1112306

参考文献

[1] 邓新明, 郭雅楠(2020). 竞争经验、多市场接触与企业绩效——基于红皇后竞争视角. 管理世界, 36(11), 111-132.
[2] 龚文, 薛姣(2020). 赋能型领导对员工创造力的影响: 个人学习与成就动机的作用. 技术经济, 39(2), 21-29.
[3] 纪方, 赵道致(2011). 基于红皇后理论的汽车产业竞争研究. 软科学, 25(10), 1-5.
[4] 江辛, 王永跃, 温巧巧(2018). 学习目标导向对员工创新行为的作用机制研究. 科研管理, 39(10), 100-107.
[5] 姜骞, 唐震(2018). “资源-能力-关系”框架下网络能力与科技企业孵化器服务创新绩效研究——知识积累的中介作用与知识基的调节作用. 科技进步与对策, 35(5), 126-133.
[6] 李树文, 罗瑾琏, 梁阜(2019). 研发企业内外部学习对组织创新的权变影响. 科学学研究, 37(11), 2092-2101.
[7] 李颖, 赵文红, 杨特(2021). 创业者先前经验、战略导向与创业企业商业模式创新关系研究. 管理学报, 18(7), 1022-1031+1106.
[8] 刘丽丽, 杜荣, 艾时钟(2016). IT服务企业中文化对知识共享与创新行为关系的影响. 中国管理科学, 24(4), 159-166.
[9] 任皓, 温忠麟, 陈启山, 叶宝娟(2013). 工作团队领导心理资本对成员组织公民行为的影响机制: 多层次模型. 心理学报, 45(1), 82-93.
[10] 唐于红, 赵琛徽, 毛江华, 丁振阔(2021). 地位竞争视角下员工主动性行为与创新绩效的关系研究. 科研管理, 42(3), 191-200.
[11] 王辉, 苏新雯(2020). 企业内部创业团队知识异质性对创造力的影响机制: 信息交流视角. 科技进步与对策, 37(24), 99-107.
[12] 王丽敏, 张莉莉(2012). 国外工作经验研究述评. 管理学报, 9(4), 621-627.
[13] 王翔, 丁书彦(2016). 工作经验、组织社会化对员工知识分享影响的实证分析. 统计与决策, (4), 95-98.
[14] 温忠麟, 黄彬彬, 汤丹丹(2018). 问卷数据建模前传. 心理科学, 41(1), 204-210.
[15] 谢晓专(2006). 企业知识管理的难点--知识共享障碍分析. 情报科学, 24(7), 1087-1090.
[16] 徐磊, 宋泓锑, 徐亮(2021). 知识产权保护视角下双向FDI的区域创新驱动机制研究. 云南财经大学学报, 37(10), 24-36.
[17] 杨红, 彭灿, 李瑞雪, 杨晓娜, 吕潮林(2021). 变革型领导、知识共享与研发团队创造力: 团队成员异质性的倒U型调节作用. 运筹与管理, 30(1), 217-224.
[18] 杨俊青, 李欣悦, 边洁(2021). 企业工匠精神、知识共享对企业创新绩效的影响. 经济问题, (3), 69-77.
[19] 杨林, 段牡钰, 刘娟, 徐臣午(2018). 高管团队海外经验、研发投入强度与企业创新绩效. 科研管理, 39(6), 9-21.
[20] 姚柱, 张显春(2021). 团队创新使命、隐性知识共享与团队创新绩效. 软科学, 35(7), 78-83+97.
[21] 于鸣, 汪金爱, 段野(2012). 红桃皇后竞争理论研究综述与展望. 外国经济与管理, 34(5), 45-51.
[22] 张少峰, 程德俊, 李菲菲, 龙静(2019). 创造性团队中地位关注动机、竞争行为与知识共享. 经济管理, 41(9), 109-124.
[23] 郑庆华, 赵嘉辉, 刘琳(2019). 企业社会责任、组织学习与创新行为. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 21(5), 103-112.
[24] 钟竞, 朱欣欣, 罗瑾琏(2019). 团队跨边界行为与新产品开发绩效: 设计创新能力的中介效应. 科技进步与对策, 36(8), 75-82.
[25] Aragon-Correa, J. A., Garcia-Morales, V. J., & Cordon-Pozo, E. (2007). Leadership and Organizational Learning’s Role on Innovation and Performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 349-359.[CrossRef
[26] Azadegan, A., Bush, D., & Dooley, K. J. (2008). Design Creativity: Static or Dynamic Capability? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28, 636-662.[CrossRef
[27] Barnett, W. P., & Hansen, M. T. (1996). The Red Queen in Organizational Evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 139-157.[CrossRef
[28] Bell, G. G. (2005). Clusters, Networks, and Firm Innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 287-295.[CrossRef
[29] Beus, J. M., Jarrett, S. M., Taylor, A. B. et al. (2014). Adjusting to New Work Teams: Testing Work Experience as a Multidimensional Resource for Newcomers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 489-506.[CrossRef
[30] Hendriks, P. (1999). Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6, 91-100.[CrossRef
[31] Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H. et al. (2007). Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Communities: The Relationship between Trust, Self-Efficacy, and Outcome Expectations. International Journal of Human—Computer Studies, 65, 153-169.[CrossRef
[32] Hu, L., & Randel, A. E. (2014). Knowledge Sharing in Teams: Social Capital, Extrinsic Incentives, and Team Innovation. Group & Organization Management, 39, 213-243.[CrossRef
[33] Kim, N., & Shim, C. (2018). Social Capital, Knowledge Sharing and Innovation of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises in a Tourism Cluster. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30, 2417-2437.[CrossRef
[34] Lu, L., Kwok et al. (2006). Managerial Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Individual, Interpersonal, and Organizational Factors. Management and Organization Review, 2, 15-41.
[35] Su, H. J., Kim, Y. G., & Koh, J. (2011). An Integrative Model for Knowledge Sharing in Communities-of-Practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 251-269.[CrossRef
[36] Tesluk, P. E., & Jacobs, R. R. (1998). Toward an Integrated Model of Work Experience. Personnel Psychology, 51, 321-355.[CrossRef
[37] Tien, H. K., Chang, B. L., & Kuo, Y. K. (2018). Does Experience Stimulate or Stifle Creativity? European Journal of Innovation Management, 22, 422-445.
[38] Valen, L. V. (1973). A New Evolutionary Law. Evolutionary Theory, 1, 1-30.
[39] Williams, M. (2016). Being Trusted: How Team Generational Age Diversity Promotes and Undermines Trust in Cross- Boundary Relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 346-373.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Wong, S.-S. (2005). Distal and Local Group Learning: Performance Trade-Offs and Tensions. Organization Science, 15, 645-656.