宋玉《九辩》与杜甫《登高》比较研究
A Comparative Study of Song Yu’s Nine Arguments and Du Fu’s Ascend to a High
摘要: 宋玉《九辩》和杜甫《登高》都是我国古代的悲秋杰作,杜甫虽以宋玉为师,但两者在写作背景、主要内容、表达情感以及艺术手法上都有着相似与差异。两者在创作背景上的相同点是都在国家衰落、人生低谷时创作而成;在主要内容上,两者虽篇幅悬殊,但在许多方面却有异曲同工之妙;在表达情感上,两者皆以萧瑟秋景抒发悲壮之情,但宋玉《九辩》表达的感情却更为复杂,于不同章节中抒发出不同的情感;在艺术手法上,两者虽在结构上有很大的差异,但在音律与表达情感中都运用了相似的艺术手法。
Abstract:
Song Yu’s Nine Arguments and Du Fu’s Ascend to a High are both masterpieces of tragic autumn in ancient China. Although Du Fu took Song Yu as his teacher, both of them have similarities and differences in writing background, main content, expression of emotions and artistic techniques. The similarities between them in the background of creation are that they were both created when the country was in decline and life was at a low ebb. In the main content, although the length of the two is very different, but in many aspects they have the same idea; in terms of emotion, both of them express their solemn and stirring feelings with bleak autumn scenery, but Song Yu’s Nine Arguments expresses more complicated feelings, expressing different emotions in different chapters. In terms of artistic techniques, although they have great differences in structure, they both use similar artistic techniques in temperament and expression of emotion.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
吴广平, 译注. 宋玉集[M]. 长沙: 岳麓出版社, 2001.
|
|
[2]
|
吴广平, 译注. 楚辞[M]. 长沙: 岳麓书社, 2011.
|
|
[3]
|
袁梅. 宋玉辞赋今读[M]. 济南: 齐鲁书社, 1986.
|
|
[4]
|
熊良智. 司马迁《屈原贾生列传》的“一家之言” [J]. 文学遗产, 2013(1): 15-26.
|
|
[5]
|
杜甫, 著. 杜甫全集[M]. 高仁, 标点. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1996.
|
|
[6]
|
孙绍振. 名作细读[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 2009: 57.
|
|
[7]
|
李炳海. 宋玉《九辩》的篇章结构及写景抒情方式[J]. 鞍山师范学院学报, 2008, 10(5): 25-31.
|
|
[8]
|
吴娟红. 杜甫《登高》文本解读与教学研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 福州: 福建师范大学, 2019.
|
|
[9]
|
伏旭翠. 杜甫《登高》的历代接受与当代教学[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2019.
|