浸渍法制备2 mm粒径Pt-SDB疏水催化剂的研究——竞争吸附剂的影响
Study on Preparation of 2 mm Pt-SDB Hydrophobic Catalyst by Impregnation—Effect of Competitive Adsorbent
摘要: 以粒径为2 mm的球形聚苯乙烯–二乙烯基苯(SDB)为载体,分别用不同浓度的柠檬酸、马来酸、酒石酸和草酸作为竞争吸附剂,浸渍法制备了Pt-SDB疏水催化剂。为了探究竞争吸附剂所产生的影响,使用透射电镜(TEM)、X射线衍射(XRD)、X射线光电子能谱(XPS)、催化剂催化交换效率(η)等对催化剂进行综合表征。结果表明,当柠檬酸、马来酸、酒石酸和草酸作为竞争吸附剂时,对柠檬酸、马来酸和酒石酸而言,其最佳的预浸渍浓度为0.1 mol/L,对草酸而言最佳的预浸渍浓度为0.2 mol/L;在实验所用到的竞争吸附剂中,草酸的效果相比其他更好,能够将Pt晶粒平均尺寸从7.45 nm减小到2.14 nm,将零价铂含量从19.37%提高到64.94%,催化剂催化效率从52%提高到89%。
Abstract: Using spherical SDB with a particle size of 2 mm as the carrier, different concentrations of citric ac-id, maleic acid, tartaric acid and oxalic acid were used as competitive adsorbents to prepared Pt-SDB hydrophobic catalysts by the impregnation method. In order to study the influence of com-petitive adsorbents on the Pt-SDB hydrophobic catalyst, TEM, XRD, XPS and catalyst catalytic effi-ciency (characterized by catalytic exchange efficiency η) are used to comprehensively characterize the catalyst. The results show that when citric acid, maleic acid, tartaric acid and oxalic acid are used as competitive adsorbents, for citric acid, maleic acid and tartaric acid, the best pre-impregnation concentration is 0.1 mol/L; for oxalic acid ,the best pre-impregnation concentra-tion is 0.2 mol/L, and the effect of 0.1 mol/L oxalic acid is also good; among the competitive adsor-bents used in the experiment, the effect of oxalic acid is better than others, which can reduce the average Pt crystal grain size from 7.45 nm to 2.14 nm, the zero-valent platinum content was in-creased from 19.37% to 64.94%, and the catalytic efficiency was increased from 52% to 89%.
文章引用:苏亚星, 胡石林, 刘亚明, 黄丽. 浸渍法制备2 mm粒径Pt-SDB疏水催化剂的研究——竞争吸附剂的影响[J]. 核科学与技术, 2022, 10(2): 58-76. https://doi.org/10.12677/NST.2022.102007

参考文献

[1] Miller, A.I. (1993) Heavy Water: A Distinctive and Essential Component of CANDU. Proceedings of International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Committee Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, 7-10 June 1993, 1-17.
[2] Holtsander, W.J., Harrison, T.E., Goyette, V., et al. (1985) Recovery and Packaging of Tritium from Canadian Heavy Water Reactors. Fu-sion Technology, 8, 2473-2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 孙颖, 王和义, 桑革, 等. 反应堆含氚重水提氚关键技术研究进展[J]. 中国工程科学, 2007, 9(5):1-6.
[4] 胡胜, 熊亮萍, 古梅, 等. Pt-Ru疏水催化剂制备及氢–水液相交换催化性能[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2009, 43(4): 294-299.
[5] Ionita, G. and Stefanescu, I. (1995) The Separation of Deuterium and Tritium on Pt/SDB/PS and Pt/C/PTFE Hydrophobic Catalysts. Fusion Tech-nology, 28, 641-647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Popescu, I., Ionita, G.H., Stefanescu, I., et al. (2008) Improved Characteristics of Hydrophobic Polytetrafluoroethylene-Platinum Catalysts for Tritium Recovery from Tritiated Water. Fusion Engineering and Design, 83, 1392-1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 胡胜, 肖成建, 朱祖良, 等. 氢水液相交换反应用高分散度Pt/C/FN疏水催化剂制备及Pt粒径效应研究[J]. 化学学报, 2007, 62(22): 2515-2521.
[8] 张珊美玉. Pt-SDB疏水催化剂的制备及表面悬挂双键作用机制研究研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2018.
[9] 胡胜, 熊亮萍, 侯京伟. 氢–水液相交换疏水催化剂制备及活性影响因素研究进展[J]. 同位素, 2012, 25(1): 8-14.
[10] 刘亚明, 胡石林, 黄丽, 等. Pt-SDB疏水催化剂的粒径效应[J]. 核化学与放射化学, 2018, 40(1): 42-47.
[11] 胡胜. 高分散度Pt基疏水催化剂制备及氢水液相催化交换性能研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 绵阳: 中国工程物理研究院, 2007.
[12] 陈葳, 肖益鸿, 詹盈盈, 等. 制备方法对Pt在氧化铝上分布状态的影响[J]. 福州大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 29(2): 88-91.
[13] 王建国, 张嘉郁, 庞礼. 浸渍法制备Pt/Al2O3催化剂的研究——竞争吸附剂对Pt分布的影响[J]. 化工学报, 1982, 2(2): 151-158.
[14] 李俊华. 憎水催化剂的研制及氢–水液相催化交换工艺研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国原子能科学研究院, 2001.
[15] 侯京伟, 熊亮萍, 翁葵平, 等. Pt/C催化剂的高压微波法制备及氢同位素交换性能研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2012, 46(7): 780-785.