竞争吸附剂对Pt-SDB催化剂活性组分分布的影响
Effects of Competitive Adsorbents on Distribution of Active Components in Pt-SDB Catalysts
DOI: 10.12677/NST.2022.102008, PDF,   
作者: 苏亚星, 胡石林, 刘亚明:中国原子能科学研究院,北京
关键词: 活性组分Pt-SDB竞争吸附剂Active Component Pt-SDB Competing Adsorbent
摘要: 为了探究竞争吸附剂对Pt-SDB催化剂活性组分Pt分布及催化活性的影响,采用柠檬酸、酒石酸、草酸对4 mm粒径柱形聚苯乙烯–二乙烯基苯(SDB)进行浸渍,然后负载铂制备Pt-SDB疏水催化剂。凭借亚甲基黄作为显色剂分析竞争吸附剂对活性组分分布的影响,并通过水氢液相催化交换反应对催化剂活性进行测试。实验结果表明:柠檬酸、酒石酸和草酸预浸渍SDB载体时的吸附机理相同,都是先占据SDB载体的表层,之后随着竞争吸附剂浓度的增大,酸在载体内的钻进深度逐渐增大;相同的酸浓度和预浸渍时间下,柠檬酸于SDB载体内的钻进深度最大,酒石酸钻进深度最小,草酸居中;不同浓度竞争吸附剂同样预浸渍30 min的情况下,对柱形Pt-SDB疏水催化剂而言,柠檬酸、酒石酸和草酸的较佳预浸渍浓度为0.3 mol/L,分别对催化剂活性有不同程度的提升作用。
Abstract: In order to explore the effect of competing adsorbents on the Pt distribution and catalytic activity of the active component Pt-SDB catalyst, citric acid, tartaric acid, and oxalic acid were used to impreg-nate 4 mm particle size cylindrical polystyrene-divinylbenzene (SDB), and then loaded with citric acid, tartaric acid, and oxalic acid. Pt-SDB hydrophobic catalyst prepared from platinum. The influ-ence of competing adsorbents on the distribution of active components was analyzed by using methylene yellow as a color developer, and the catalyst activity was tested by the liquid-phase cat-alytic exchange reaction of water and hydrogen. The experimental results show that the adsorption mechanism of citric acid, tartaric acid and oxalic acid pre-impregnated with SDB carrier is the same, which occupies the surface layer of SDB support first, and then gradually increases the drilling depth of acid in the carrier with the increase of the concentration of competitive adsorbents; under the same acid concentration and pre-impregnation time, citric acid has the largest drilling depth in the SDB carrier, the drilling depth of tartaric acid is the smallest, and the oxalic acid is centered; under the same pre-impregnation of different concentrations of competitive adsorbents for 30 min, for the cylindrical Pt-SDB hydrophobic catalyst. The preferred pre-maceration concentrations of cit-ric acid, tartaric acid and oxalic acid were 0.3 mol/L, which had different degrees of enhancement effect on catalyst activity.
文章引用:苏亚星, 胡石林, 刘亚明. 竞争吸附剂对Pt-SDB催化剂活性组分分布的影响[J]. 核科学与技术, 2022, 10(2): 77-84. https://doi.org/10.12677/NST.2022.102008

参考文献

[1] 张嘉郁, 王建国, 庞礼. 浸渍法制备的Pt-Al2O3催化剂——考察几种酸影响铂组份分布的规律[J]. 石油化工, 1981, 10(5): 305-309.
[2] 方林霞, 井强山. 竞争吸附剂对负载型常温精脱硫剂上活性组分的分散作用与表征[J]. 许昌学院学报, 2003, 22(2): 31-34.
[3] 史鸿鑫, 过中儒. 金属离子在Al2O3上的吸附机制与分布规律[J]. 浙江工学院学报, 1994, 65(4): 1-6.
[4] 李北芦, 梁娟, 韩宝祥, 等. 催化剂金属组份在载体中分布的控制[J]. 催化学报, 1985, 6(1): 95-99.
[5] 过中儒, 詹肇骥. H2PdCl4和竞争吸附剂在Al2O3上吸附的研究[J]. 应用化学, 1987, 4(2): 31-35.
[6] 张香兰, 黄裕栋, 张家赫, 等. 竞争吸附剂对载溴活性炭活性组分分布及脱汞性能的影响[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2018, 3(5): 492-499.
[7] 靳彪, 马爱增, 王春明. 不同Pt分布的Pt-Sn/Al2O3催化剂的制备与TPT表征[J]. 齐鲁石油化工, 2010, 38(1): 48-51.
[8] Mi Chalko, E. (1966) Preparation of Catalyst for the Treatment of Combustible Waste Products. US Patent No. 3259589.
[9] Dougherty, R.C., Verykios, X.E. (1986) Optimization of Catalytic Activity Distributions in Series and Parallel Reaction Schemes. AIChE Journal, 11, 1858-1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 马春景, 卢立义, 李应成. 蛋壳型催化剂结构、制备方法及其催化性能影响因素分析[J]. 化学反应工程与工艺, 2008, 24(1): 82-88.
[11] 黄星亮, 宋月芹, 沈师孔. Pd/Al2O3液相选择加氢催化剂抗硫性能研究[J]. 高等化学学报, 2002, 16(5): 575-579
[12] 徐佩若, 徐争勇, 朱志华. 乙烯直接催化氧化合成醋酸II-负载型Pd-杂多酸催化剂制备条件的选择[J]. 华东理工大学学报, 2001, 27(3): 230-233.
[13] 傅骐. 浅析双氧水生产用钯催化剂的合理使用[J]. 工业催化, 2002, 10(3): 39-41.
[14] 李薇, 侯永江, 国洁, 等. 提高Pt在载体上分散度的研究进展[J]. 河北化工, 2012, 35(5): 53-56.
[15] 李俊华. 憎水催化剂的研制及氢–水液相催化交换工艺研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国原子能科学研究院, 2001.
[16] Hu, S., Hou, J.W., Xiong, L.P., et al. (2011) Hydrophobic Pt with Different Carbon Substrates for the Interphase Hydrogen Isotope Separation. Separation and Purification Technology, 77, 214-219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef