强夯设计参数对高填方粉土路堤加固效果研究
Study on Improvement Effect of Dynamic Compaction Design Parameters on High Fill Silt Road Embankment
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2022.115079, PDF,   
作者: 王一丁：济南市政公用资产管理运营有限公司，山东 济南；于 坤, 张 冉, 王 健：山东省交通规划设计院集团有限公司，山东 济南；李景磊, 姚占勇, 王 勇：山东大学齐鲁交通学院，山东 济南
关键词: 强夯；高填方路堤；粉土；加固效果；Dynamic Compaction； High Fill Embankment； Silty Soil； Improvement Effect
摘要: 建立高填方粉土路堤强夯ABAQUS有限元分析模型，并以山东地区某高速公路高填方粉土路堤强夯加固试验路为依托对该模型进行验证，研究强夯施工设计参数对高填方粉土路堤加固效果的影响。以路堤底部达到90%压实度为有效加固指标，采用1500 kN∙m夯击能、夯点间距3.2 m、夯击10次的设计参数可对4 m高粉土路堤进行有效加固；同时优选7000 kN∙m夯击能开展8 m高粉土路堤强夯加固试验，以达到90%压实度的加固区域作为路堤强夯的有效加固范围，该高度松填粉土路堤的建议强夯设计参数为：夯击能7000 kN∙m、夯间距5.2 m、夯击次数14次。
Abstract: The ABAQUS finite element analysis model of dynamic compaction was established, and the model was verified based on the dynamic compaction reinforcement test road of an expressway in Shandong province, and the influence of construction design parameters of dynamic compaction on the reinforcement effect of high-fill silt road embankment was studied. With 90% compaction at the bottom of embankment as the effective reinforcement index, 4 m high silt soil embankment can be effectively strengthened by using the tamping energy of 1500 kN∙m, the distance between tamping points of 3.2 m and 10 times of tamping. At the same time, the compaction capacity of 7000 kN∙m is selected to carry out the dynamic compaction reinforcement test of 8 m high silt soil embankment, and the reinforcement area with 90% compaction degree is taken as the effective consolidation range of embankment dynamic compaction. The recommended dynamic compaction design parameters of this highly loose filled silt soil embankment are: compaction energy is 7000 kN∙m, compaction interval is 5.2 m, and 14 times compaction.
文章引用：王一丁, 于坤, 张冉, 王健, 李景磊, 姚占勇, 王勇. 强夯设计参数对高填方粉土路堤加固效果研究[J]. 土木工程, 2022, 11(5): 737-749. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2022.115079

参考文献

[1] 姚占勇. 黄河冲淤积平原土的工程特性研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 天津: 天津大学, 2006.
[2] 李晓静, 姚凯, 李术才, 张超. 黄泛区饱和粉土动强度特性试验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(3): 78-81.
[3] Sieradzki, M.P., Patton, B.W., Sereno, D.J. and Wehrlen, P. (2013) Deep Dynamic Compaction: Practical and Cost- Effective Ground Improvement at the Port of Long Beach. Proceedings of Ports’13: 13th Triennial International Conference, Seattle, Washington, 25-28 August 2013, 128-141.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Feng, S.-J., Du, F.-L., Shi, Z.-M., Shui, W.-H. and Tan, K. (2015) Field Study on the Reinforcement of Collapsible Loess Using Dynamic Compaction. Engineering Geology, 185, 105-115.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] 李晓静, 李术才, 姚凯, 祝少纯, 吕国仁. 黄泛区路基强夯时超孔隙水压力变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(9): 2815-2820.
[6] 翟明虎. 黄泛区粉土路基强夯质量研究分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东建筑大学, 2016.
[7] 徐平, 乐金朝, 刘忠玉, 马清文. 高填方路堤强夯效果的现场检测及三维有限元模拟[J]. 工程地质学报, 2009, 17(2): 268-273.
[8] 滕显飞. 黄泛区粉土路基强夯加固数值分析与质量控制技术研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2017.
[9] 郭乃正, 邹金锋, 杨小礼, 李亮. 高填方路堤强夯试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2007(3): 53-57.
[10] Pak, A., Shahir, H. and Ghassemi, A. (2005) Behavior of Dry and Saturated Soils under Impact Load during Dynamic Compaction. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Osaka, Japan, 12-16 September 2005, 368-385.
[11] Ghanbari, E. and Hamidi, A. (2014) Numerical Modeling of Rapid Impact Compaction in Loose Sands. Geomechanics and Engineering, 6, 487-502.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] 姚占勇, 周冲, 蒋红光, 毕玉峰, 孙梦林, 周磊生, 齐辉. 基于帽盖模型的强夯地基应力–应变特征与有效加固范围分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(4): 969-977.
[13] Dimaggio. F.L. and Sandler, I.S. (1971) Material Models for Granular Soils. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 97, 935-950.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] 陈育民, 徐鼎平. FLAC\FLAC3D基础与工程实例[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2013.
[15] 厉超. 粉土地基强夯动力特性及有效加固范围研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2016.
[16] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. JGJ 79-2012. 建筑地基处理技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑科学研究院, 2012.

为你推荐