道德认同对大学生道德困境判断的影响：基于PD模型的分析
The Influence of Moral Identity on College Students’ Moral Dilemma Judgments: A Process Dissociation Analysis
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.126239, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 马飞鸿, 云 祥, 陈鸿勃, 李鑫鑫, 李沂璇, 张绮洋：南京森林警察学院，江苏 南京
关键词: 道德认同；道德判断；PD模型；Moral Identity； Moral Dilemma Judgment； PD Model
摘要: 基于道德困境的PD分析模型(Process Dissociation analysis, PD)，以120名大学生为被试，通过道德认同问卷、道德困境判断材料，考察被试在道德困境中，不同的道德认同水平对其判断选择的影响。传统道德困境分析方法显示，道德认同水平较高的被试，在道德困境选择中更偏好道义论的选择。进一步使用PD模型分析表明，道德认同能显著预测个体在道德困境判断时的道义论倾向(D参数)，但无法预测其功利主义倾向(U参数)，即道德认同只通过促进个体的道义论倾向，导致个体做出道义论的判断。
Abstract: Based on PD (Process Dissociation analysis) model of moral dilemma, 120 college students were taken as participants, and the influence of different moral identity levels on their judgment choices in moral dilemma was investigated through moral identity questionnaire, moral dilemma judgment materials. Traditional analyses of moral dilemma indicated that the participants with higher internalization of self-importance of moral identity showed a stronger preference for deontological over utilitarian judgments. Further analysis with PD model revealed that higher internalization of self-importance of moral identity was significantly associated with deontological inclinations but not with utilitarian inclinations. The findings suggest that moral identity leads individuals to make deontological judgments only by promoting their deontological tendencies.
文章引用：马飞鸿, 云祥, 陈鸿勃, 李鑫鑫, 李沂璇, 张绮洋 (2022). 道德认同对大学生道德困境判断的影响：基于PD模型的分析. 心理学进展, 12(6), 2019-2026. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.126239

参考文献

[1] 刘仁贵(2014). 道德认同概念辨析. 伦理学研究, (6), 15-20.
[2] 万增奎, 杨韶刚(2008). 青少年道德自我认同问卷的修订. 社会心理科学, 23(5), 41-45.
[3] Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The Self-Importance of Moral Identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423-1440.[CrossRef] 
[4] Arutyunova, K. R., Alexandrov, Y. I., & Hauser, M. D. (2016). Sociocultural Influences on Moral Judgments: East-West, Male-Female, and Young-Old. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article No. 1334.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2020). Universals and Variations in Moral Decisions Made in 42 Countries by 70,000 Participants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117, 2332-2337.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Bartels, D. M. (2008). Principled Moral Sentiment and the Flexibility of Moral Judgment and Decision Making. Cognition, 108, 381-417.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Bostyn, D. H., & Roets, A. (2017). An Asymmetric Moral Conformity Effect: Subjects Conform to Deontological but Not Consequentialist Majorities. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 323-330.[CrossRef] 
[8] Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and Utilitarian Inclinations in Moral Decision Making: A Process Dissociation Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 216-235.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Cottrell, C. A., Neuberg, S. L., & Li, N. P. (2007). What Do People Desire in Others? A Sociofunctional Perspective on the Importance of Different Valued Characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 208-231.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Critcher, C. R., Helzer, E. G., & Tannenbaum, D. (2020). Moral Character Evaluation: Testing Another’s Moral-Cognitive Machinery. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, Article ID: 103906.[CrossRef] 
[11] Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral Disengagement in Ethical Decision Making: A Study of Antecedents and Outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 374-391.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Everett, J. A., Faber, N. S., Savulescu, J., & Crockett, M. J. (2018). The Costs of being Consequentialist: Social Inference from Instrumental Harm and Impartial Beneficence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 200-216.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Everett, J. A., Pizarro, D. A., & Crockett, M. J. (2016). Inference of Trustworthiness from Intuitive Moral Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 772-787.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Gawronski, B., & Beer, J. S. (2017). What Makes Moral Dilemma Judgments “Utilitarian” or “Deontological”? Social Neuroscience, 12, 626-632.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Gawronski, B., Armstrong, J., Conway, P., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2017). Consequences, Norms, and Generalized Inaction in Moral Dilemmas: The CNI Model of Moral Decision-Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 343-376.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Gotowiec, S., & van Mastrigt, S. (2019). Having versus Doing: The Roles of Moral Identity Internalization and Symbolization for Prosocial Behaviors. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159, 75-91.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Greene, J. D. (2007). Why Are VMPFC Patients More Utilitarian? A Dual-Process Theory of Moral Judgment Explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 322-323.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2011). How Moral Foundations Theory Succeeded in Building on Sand: A Response to Suhler and Churchland. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2117-2122.[CrossRef] 
[20] Hardy, S. A., Nadal, A. R., & Schwartz, S. J. (2017). The Integration of Personal Identity, Religious Identity, and Moral Identity in Emerging Adulthood. Identity, 17, 96-107.[CrossRef] 
[21] Hardy, S. A., Walker, L. J., Rackham, D. D., & Olsen, J. A. (2012). Religiosity and Adolescent Empathy and Aggression: The Mediating Role of Moral Identity. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4, 237-248.[CrossRef] 
[22] Hertz, S. G., & Krettenauer, T. (2016). Does Moral Identity Effectively Predict Moral Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Review of General Psychology, 20, 129-140.[CrossRef] 
[23] Kahane, G., Everett, J. A., Earp, B. D., Caviola, L., Faber, N. S., Crockett, M. J., & Savulescu, J. (2018). Beyond Sacrificial Harm: A Two-Dimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology. Psychological Review, 125, 131-164.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Kaur, S. (2020). Effect of Religiosity and Moral Identity Internalization on Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Human Values, 26, 186-198.[CrossRef] 
[25] Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872.[CrossRef] 
[26] Reed, A., Aquino, K., & Levy, E. (2007). Moral Identity and Judgments of Charitable Behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71, 178-193.[CrossRef] 
[27] Rom, S. C., Weiss, A., & Conway, P. (2017). Judging Those Who Judge: Perceivers Infer the Roles of Affect and Cognition Underpinning Others’ Moral Dilemma Responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 44-58.[CrossRef] 
[28] Sorokowski, P., Marczak, M., Misiak, M., & Białek, M. (2020). Trolley Dilemma in Papua. Yali Horticulturalists Refuse to Pull the Lever. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 398-403.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Takamatsu, R., & Takai, J. (2019). With or without Empathy: Primary Psychopathy and Difficulty in Identifying Feelings Predict Utilitarian Judgment in Sacrificial Dilemmas. Ethics & Behavior, 29, 71-85.[CrossRef] 
[30] Uhlmann, E. L., Zhu, L. L., & Tannenbaum, D. (2013). When It Takes a Bad Person to Do the Right Thing. Cognition, 126, 326-334.[CrossRef] [PubMed]