论科幻小说《金羊毛》中的人工智能主体性
On AI’s Subjectivity in the Science Fiction Golden Fleece
DOI: 10.12677/WLS.2022.102022, PDF,   
作者: 朱晓玲：东南大学外国语学院，江苏 南京
关键词: 《金羊毛》；人工智能；主体性；科幻小说；Golden Fleece； Artificial Intelligence； Subjectivity； Science Fiction
摘要: 科幻小说《金羊毛》以太空中的一场谋杀案为起点，讲述主人公亚伦在追击凶手过程中与阿尔戈号上人工智能控制系统杰森之间的博弈。通过作者罗伯特•索耶的刻画，杰森展现为具备交互性、自主性和适应性的人工智能主体。其交互性显现为控制船员的工具，自主性成为隐瞒信息的途径，而适应性则是杰森试图保护自身和人类群体的方法。三者相互交融，共同构建杰森的主体性。科幻小说提供了支持讨论人工智能主体性甚至道德建构之可能的证据，因而呈现出不同于其他学科的远见。
Abstract: Starting with a murder in space, the science fiction Golden Fleece narrates the game between Jason, the AI controlling system on the spaceship Argo, and the protagonist Aaron. Through the author Robert Sawyer’s portrayal, Jason is presented as an artificial intelligent subject with interactivity, autonomy, and adaptability. Jason’s interactivity manifests itself as a tool to manipulate the crew, autonomy as a channel to withhold information, and adaptability as a way to preserve himself and the human community. The above-mentioned three aspects blend with each other to form Jason’s subjectivity. Sci-fi works provide evidence to support the discussion concerning the possibility of AI’s subjectivity and even its moral construction, thus presenting a foresight different from other disciplines.
文章引用：朱晓玲. 论科幻小说《金羊毛》中的人工智能主体性[J]. 世界文学研究, 2022, 10(2): 139-145. https://doi.org/10.12677/WLS.2022.102022

参考文献

[1] 韩旭至. 人工智能不是人: 从主体构建批判到非主体规制策略[J]. 大连海事大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(4): 19-28.
[2] 闫坤如. 人工智能机器具有道德主体地位吗?[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2019(5): 47-51.
[3] 彭文华. 自由意志道德代理与智能代理——兼论人工智能犯罪主体资格之生成[J]. 法学, 2019(10): 18-33.
[4] 戴益斌. 人工智能伦理何以可能——基于道德主体和道德接受者的视角[J]. 伦理学研究, 2020(5): 96-102.
[5] 刘永安. 人工道德主体是否可能的意识之维[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(2): 117-122.
[6] 骁克. 论人工智能法律主体的法哲学基础[J]. 政治与法律, 2021(4): 109-121.
[7] Searle, J.R. (1980) Minds, Brains and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417-457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] van Wynsberghe, A. and Robbins, S. (2019) Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 719-735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Kaplan, A. and Haenlein, M. (2019) Siri, Siri, in My Hand: Who’s the Fairest in the Land? On the Interpretations, Illustrations, and Implications of Artificial Intelligence. Business Horizons, 62, 15-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Poole, D.L. and Mackworth, A.K. (2010) Artificial Intelligence: Foundations of Computational Agents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Russell, S.J. and Norvig, P. (2010) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Hoboken, 8.
[12] Floridi, L. and Sanders, J.W. (2004) On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines, 14, 349-379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Boddington, P. (2017) Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] 罗伯特•索耶. 金羊毛[M]. 乐明, 译. 成都: 四川科学技术出版社, 2016: 2, 6, 33, 34, 37, 94, 95, 130, 140, 169, 172, 222.
[15] 艾萨克•阿西莫夫. 我, 机器人[M]. 程文, 国强, 赛德, 译. 北京: 科学普及出版社, 1981: 46.
[16] Bartneck, C., Lütge, C., Wagner, A. and Welsh, S. (2021) An Introduction to Ethics in Robotics and AI. Springer, Cham, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Powers, T.M. and Ganascia, J.-G. (2020) The Ethics of the Ethics of AI. In: Dubber, M.D., et al., Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI, Oxford University Press, New York, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐