杠杆率对上市商业银行系统性风险的影响研究
Research on the Influence of Leverage Ratio on Systemic Risk of Listed Commercial Banks
DOI: 10.12677/WER.2022.112018, PDF,   
作者: 彭 海:杭州电子科技大学经济学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 系统性风险杠杆率SRISK指标固定效应分位数回归Systemic Risk Leverage Ratio SRISK Fixed Effect Quantile Regression
摘要: 为了探究杠杆率对商业银行系统性风险的影响并分析杠杆率影响的传导路径,本文以11个上市商业银行从2010年初至2019年末的数据为样本,选择SRISK指标作为本文系统性风险度量指标,运用固定效应的面板数据分位数回归模型和中介效应模型,分析在不同风险水平下杠杆率对系统性风险的影响程度,以及杠杆率对系统性风险的影响链路。研究结果显示,杠杆率的提高会降低银行系统性风险,尤其在较高的风险水平下;杠杆率通过不良贷款比率和存贷款比率来对银行系统性风险产生激励效应。因此,提出建议如下:不可简单地直接放松或限制银行杠杆率;对杠杆率的监管力度需视情况而定;关注不良贷款比率和存贷款比率。
Abstract: To explore the influence of leverage ratio on systemic risk of commercial banks and analyze the transmission path of influence of leverage ratio, with data of 11 listed commercial banks from 2010 to 2019 as research samples in this paper, SRISK index is selected as the systematic risk measure-ment, both the quantile regression model and mediating effect model of fixed-effect panel data were used to analyze the influencing degrees of leverage ratio on systemic risk at different risk levels, and the link of leverage ratio on systemic risk was studied. The results show that the increase of leverage ratio will reduce the systemic risk of banks, especially under a higher risk level; leverage ratio has incentive effect on systemic risk of banks through NPL ratio and loan-deposit ratio. There-fore, some suggestions are put forward: It couldn’t to simply and directly relax or limit bank lever-age ratio; the regulatory intensity of leverage ratio depends on the circumstances; pay attention to non-performing loan ratio and deposit and loan ratio.
文章引用:彭海. 杠杆率对上市商业银行系统性风险的影响研究[J]. 世界经济探索, 2022, 11(2): 155-165. https://doi.org/10.12677/WER.2022.112018

参考文献

[1] 王桂虎. 宏观杠杆率引致系统性金融风险的传导机制——基于40个国家及地区的经验研究[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 51(6): 53-58+156.
[2] 娄飞鹏. 金融与非金融去杠杆[J]. 金融理论探索, 2017(5): 20-26.
[3] 李丰团, 董佳奇, 李莹. 杠杆率结构与结构性去杠杆[J]. 中国注册会计师, 2020(8): 56-62.
[4] 陈丽萍, 吴军, 杨戈. 企业部门杠杆率结构性特征研究——基于影子银行视角[J]. 金融论坛, 2019, 24(4): 3-14+28.
[5] Bleck, A. (2018) Regulating Bank Leverage. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 10, 264-274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Gadzo, S.G. and Asiamah, S.K. (2018) Assessment of the Rela-tionship between Leverage and Performance: An Empirical Study of Unlisted Banks in Ghana. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 10, 123-133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 万光彩, 左正东. 杠杆率对商业银行经营绩效的影响研究——基于22家上市商业银行的面板数据[J]. 长春理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 32(1): 81-87.
[8] 刘锦妹, 张杰茹. 杠杆率对商业银行盈利能力影响的研究——基于 A 股市场21家上市商业银行的实证分析[J]. 长春理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 33(4): 110-116.
[9] Kwon, S., Jung, T. and Sunwoo, H.Y. (2019) Does Stock Price Crash of Firms in the Same Business Group Cause Stock Price Crash in Other Member Firm? Evidence from Korea. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55, 1-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 李政, 梁琪, 方意. 中国金融部门间系统性风险溢出的监测预警研究——基于下行和上行ΔCoES指标的实现与优化[J]. 金融研究, 2019(2): 40-58.
[11] 王道平, 刘杨靖卓, 徐宇轩, 刘琳琳. 金融科技、宏观审慎监管与我国银行系统性风险[J]. 财贸经济, 2022, 43(4): 71-84.
[12] 张林, 罗新雨. 宏观审慎监管与商业银行系统性风险——基于16家上市商业银行的实证分析[J]. 信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 42(2): 38-42.
[13] Barth, A. and Seckinger, C. (2018) Capital Regulation with Hetero-geneous Banks-Unintended Consequences of a Too Strict Leverage Ratio. Journal of Banking and Finance, 88, 455-465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Beltrame, F., Previtali, D. and Sclip, A. (2018) Systematic Risk and Banks Leverage: The Role of Asset Quality. Finance Research Letters, 27, 113-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Pfeifer, L., Holub, L., Pithart, Z., et al. (2017) Leverage Ratio and Its Impact on the Resilience of the Banking Sector and Efficiency of Macroprudential Policy. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 69, 277-299.
[16] Acosta-Smith, J., Grill, M. and Lang, J.H. (2020) The Leverage Ratio, Risk-Taking and Bank Stability. Journal of Financial Stability, 6, Article ID: 100833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Cincinelli, P., Pellini, E. and Urga, G. (2021) Leverage and Systemic Risk Pro-Cyclicality in the Chinese Financial System. International Review of Financial Analysis, 78, Article ID: 101895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Barth, J.R. and Matteo, M.S. (2018) Benefits and Costs of a Higher Bank “Leverage Ratio”. Journal of Financial Stability, 38, 37-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 陈伟平, 张娜. 杠杆率监管具有风险抑制效应吗?——来自中国商业银行的经验证据[J]. 金融与经济, 2018(11): 8-14.
[20] 郭桂霞, 于丽洁, 张尧. 我国商业银行系统性风险影响因素及作用机制——以或有资本债券为例[J]. 中国软科学, 2021(10): 160-170.
[21] 程小庆, 葛璐澜. 银行系统性风险与宏观审慎评估体系有效性分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(19): 146-151.
[22] 张庆君, 马红亮, 岳媛. 杠杆率视角下货币政策与银行系统性风险防范[J]. 会计与经济研究, 2020, 34(4): 96-114.
[23] 洪振木, 李悦. 基于∆CoVaR方法的商业银行系统性风险研究[J]. 吉林工商学院学报, 2021, 37(3): 82-89.
[24] 郭晨, 吴君民, 宋清华. 银行系统性风险多渠道形成机制及测度研究[J/OL]. 系统工程理论与实践. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2267.N.20211203.0132.004.html
[25] 陆静, 胡晓红. 基于条件在险价值法的商业银行系统性风险研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2014(4): 25-42.
[26] 靳玉英, 贾松波. 杠杆率监管的引入对商业银行资产结构的影响研究[J]. 国际金融研究, 2016(6): 52-60.
[27] 张庆君, 陈思. 杠杆率监管引入对商业银行风险承担具有缓释效应吗?——基于中国96家商业银行的实证分析[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2019, 40(3): 29-44.
[28] 卢露, 杨文华. 杠杆率监管能有效降低银行系统性风险吗?——基于内生性网络模型的模拟分析[J]. 财经研究, 2020, 64(2): 52-66.
[29] 戴金甫. 银行系统性风险与杠杆率及资本充足率研究: 资产质量的作用[J]. 未来与发展, 2019, 43(4): 61-66+88.
[30] 罗萍, 周刚. 商业银行杠杆率与系统性风险——来自我国商业银行的经验[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2018(7): 81-88.