科学家角色冲突对学术创业绩效的影响机理研究
Research on the Influence Mechanism of Scientist Role Conflict on Academic Entrepreneurial Performance
摘要: 科学家创业能有效地实现科技成果转化，而我国的科学家创业效果未达到预期，科技成果转化率持续低下，如何提升科学家创业绩效成为亟待解决的关键问题。本研究从科学家个人角度出发，聚焦于创业过程中普遍面临的角色冲突问题，将创业绩效分为技术创新绩效与财务绩效两个层面、引入三种角色冲突处理策略，通过文献研究与理论推理，讨论科学家角色冲突对创业绩效的影响机理。经研究发现，角色冲突对企业财务绩效有负向影响，对企业技术创新绩效存在倒U型影响；兼顾策略和科学家倾向的分离策略削弱了角色冲突对财务绩效的负向影响，增强了角色冲突对技术创新绩效的倒U型影响；企业家倾向的分离策略削弱了角色冲突对财务绩效的负向影响，也削弱了对技术创新绩效的倒U型影响。
Abstract: Scientists’ entrepreneurship can effectively realize the transformation of scientific and technological achievements. However, the entrepreneurial effect of scientists in China has not reached the expected level, and the conversion rate of scientific and technological achievements has continued to be low. How to improve the entrepreneurial performance of scientists has become a key issue to be solved urgently. This research focuses on the role conflicts that are commonly faced in the entrepreneurial process from the perspective of scientists. By dividing entrepreneurial performance into two levels: technological innovation performance and financial performance and introducing role conflict management strategies as adjustment variables .This study attempts to discuss the mechanism of the impact of scientist role conflicts on entrepreneurial performance. The study found that role conflict has a negative impact on corporate financial performance, and has an inverted U-shaped impact on corporate technology innovation performance; The scientist-inclined separation strategy and balanced strategy to weaken the negative impact of role conflict on financial performance and enhance the inverted U-type effect of role conflict on technological innovation performance; the entrepreneur-inclined separation strategy weakens the negative impact of role conflict on financial performance and weakens the inverted U-shaped effect of role conflict on technological innovation performance.
文章引用：严方. 科学家角色冲突对学术创业绩效的影响机理研究[J]. 现代管理, 2022, 12(8): 961-970. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2022.128130

参考文献

[1] Abreu, M. and Grinevich, V. (2013) The Nature of Academic Entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the Focus on Entrepreneurial Activities. Research Policy, 42, 408-422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Guo, F., Zou, B., Guo, J., Shi, Y., Bo, Q. and Shi, L. (2019) What Determines Academic Entrepreneurship Success? A Social Identity Perspective. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 929-952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Jain, S., George, G. and Maltarich, M. (2009) Academics or Entrepreneurs? Investigating Role Identity Mo dification of University Scientists Involved in Commercialization Activity. Research Policy, 38, 929-930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Armano, B. and Domenico Scagnelli, S. (2012) Academic Entrepreneurs’ Role in Science-Based Companies. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15, 192-211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Nielsen, K. (2015) Human Capital and New Venture Performance: The Industry Choice and Performance of Academic Entrepreneurs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 453-474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Cooper, A.C., Gimeno-Gascon, F.J. and Woo, C.Y. (1994) Initial Human and Financial Capital as Predictors of New Venture Performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 371-395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] 朱学彦. 学术企业家与企业绩效关系研究——以大学教师创业为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2004.
[8] 汪怿. 学术创业: 内涵、瓶颈与推进策略[J]. 教育发展研究, 2013, 33(17): 15-23.
[9] Toole, A.A. and Czarnitzki, D. (2009) Exploring the Relationship between Scientist Human Capital and Firm Performance: The Case of Biomedical Academic Entrepreneurs in the SBIR Program. Management Science, 55, 101-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Hayter, C.S. (2016) Constraining Entrepreneurial Development: A Knowledge-Based View of Social Networks among Academic Entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 45, 475-490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Hmieleski, K.M. and Powell, E.E. (2018) The Psychological Foundations of University Science Commercialization: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32, 43-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Hirsh, J.B. and Kang, S.K. (2016) Mechanisms of Identity Conflict: Uncertainty, Anxiety, and the Behavioral Inhibition System. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 223-244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Pache A. and Santos F. (2013) Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 972- 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Greenhaus, B. and Beutell, N.J. (1985) Sources of Conflict Between Work and Family Roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Cyert, R.M. and Goodman, P.S. (1997) Creating effective University-Industry Alliances: An Organizational Learning Perspective. Organizational Dynamics, 25, 45-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Litan, R.E., Mitchell, L. and Reedy, E.J. (2007) The University as Innovator: Bumps in the Road. Issues in Science and Technology, 23, 57-66.
[17] Sutin, A.R., Terracciano, A., Deiana, B., Naitza, S., Ferrucci, L., Uda, M., Schlessinger, D. and Costa, P.T. (2010) High Neuroticism and Low Conscientiousness Are Associated with Interleukin-6. Psychological Medicine, 40, 1485-1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] McGregor, I., Prentice, M. and Nash, K. (2012) Approaching Relief: Compensatory Ideals Relieve Threat Induced Anxiety by Promoting Approach-Motivated States. Social Cognition, 30, 689-714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Kieser, A. and Leiner, L. (2009) Why the Rigour-Relevance Gap in Management Research Is Unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 516-533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Bauer, J.C., Schmitt, P., Morwitz, V.G. and Winer, R.S. (2013) Managerial Decision Making in Customer Management: Adaptive, Fast and Frugal? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 436-455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] George, G., Jain, S. and Maltarich, M.A. (2005) Academics or Entrepreneurs? Entrepreneurial Identity and Invention Disclosure Behavior of University Scientists. Academy of Management Conference, 11-16 August 2006, Atlanta, USA. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Hughes, A. and Kitson, M. (2001) Pathways to Impact and the Strategic Role of Universities: New Evidence on the Breadth and Depth of University Knowledge Exchange in the UK and the Factors Constraining Its Development. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, 723-750.
[23] Chan, L.K.C., Lakonishok, J. and Sougiannis, T. (2012) The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures. Journal of Finance, 56, 2431-2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] 陈劲, 陈钰芬. 企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2006, 27(3): 86-91.
[25] Würmseher, M. (2016) To Each His Own: Matching Different Entrepreneurial Models to the Academic Scientist’s Individual Needs. Technovation, 59, 1-17.
[26] Barr, S.H., Baker, T., Markham, S.K. and Kingon, A.I. (2009) Bridging the Valley of Death: Lessons Learned from 14 Years of Commercialization of Technology Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 370-388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] Zou, B., Guo, J., Guo, F., Shi, Y. and Li, Y. (2019) Who am I? The Influence of Social Identification on Academic Entrepreneurs’ Role Conflict. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 363-384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] Shepherd, D. and Haynie, J.M. (2009) Family Business, Identity Conflict, and an Expedited Entrepreneurial Process: A Process of Resolving Identity Conflict. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1245-1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[29] Lam, A. (2011) What Motivates Academic Scientists to Engage in Research Commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘Ribbon’ or ‘Puzzle’? Research Policy, 40, 1354-1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[30] Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D.S. and Wright, M. (2011) Thirty Years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40, 1045-1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[31] 殷朝晖, 李瑞君. 美国研究型大学教师学术创业及其启示[J]. 教育科学, 2018, 34(3): 88-94.

为你推荐