急性应激对工作记忆抑制不同呈现方式的分心信息的影响——来自多体素模式分析的证据
Effects of Acute Stress on Working Memory Inhibition of Distracting Information Presented Differently—Evidence from Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.129355, PDF,   
作者: 刘 旻, 王 江, 陈 梦, 胡 莎:贵州师范大学心理学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 急性应激工作记忆CDA解码Acute Stress Working Memory CDA Decoding
摘要: 多体素模式分析通常用于研究典型个体的神经认知处理机制,它们可用于量化单参与者神经信号中存在的信息。解码方法对于确定应激人群和非应激人群的信息表示方式有何不同也具有潜在价值。故而采用多体素模式分析来探究急性应激对工作记忆抑制不同呈现方式的分心信息的影响。我们在一项工作记忆任务中探究了应激组和对照组ERP的信息内容,该任务涉及记住显示的一侧记住2、4、(2加2延迟)和(2加2延迟分心)个项目并忽略另一侧。ERP结果显示,记忆负荷主效应显著,F (3, 159) = 12.677,p < 0.001,η² = 0.196。组别主效应显著,F (1, 53) = 5.243,p = 0.026,η² = 0.092,应激组的波幅值小于控制组的波幅值。记忆负荷和组别之间交互作用不显著,F (3, 159) = 0.355,p = 0.232,η² = 0.027。解码结果显示,在所有条件下控制组的正确率均显著高于应激组。说明急性应激会对工作记忆抑制不同呈现方式的分心信息有影响。
Abstract: Multi-voxel pattern analyses are commonly used to study neurocognitive processing mechanisms in typical individuals, and they can be used to quantify the information present in neural signals of a single participant. Decoding methods are also potentially valuable for determining how information is represented differently between stressed and non-stressed people. Therefore, multi-voxel pattern analysis was used to explore the effect of acute stress on working memory inhibition of distracting information presented in different ways. We explored the information content of the stress and control ERP in a working memory task that involved remembering 2, 4, (2 plus 2 delayed) and (2 plus 2 delayed distraction) items and ignore the other side. The ERP results showed that the main effect of memory load was significant, F (3, 159) = 12.677, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.196. The main effect of group was significant, F (1, 53) = 5.243, p = 0.026, η2 = 0.092, and the amplitude of the stress group was smaller than that of the control group. The interaction between memory load and groups was not significant, F (3, 159) = 0.355, p = 0.232, η2 = 0.027. The decoding results showed that the correct rate of the control group was significantly higher than that of the stress group under all conditions. This indicates that acute stress may have an effect on working memory to suppress distracting information presented in different ways.
文章引用:刘旻, 王江, 陈梦, 胡莎 (2022). 急性应激对工作记忆抑制不同呈现方式的分心信息的影响——来自多体素模式分析的证据. 心理学进展, 12(9), 2958-2968. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.129355

参考文献

[1] 雷威, 杨志, 詹旻野, 李红, 翁旭初(2010). 利用脑成像多体素模式分析解码认知的神经表征: 原理和应用. 心理科学进展, 18(12), 1934-1941.
[2] 杨娟, 张庆林(2010). 特里尔社会应激测试技术的介绍以及相关研究. 心理科学进展, 18(4), 699-704.
[3] Arnsten, A. F. T., Raskind, M. A., Taylor, F. B., & Connor, D. F. (2015). The Effects of Stress Exposure on Prefrontal Cortex: Translating Basic Research into Successful Treatments for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Neurobiology of Stress, 1, 89-99.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Artchakov, D., Tikhonravov, D., Ma, Y., Neuvonen, T., Linnankoski, I., & Carlson, S. (2009). Distracters Impair and Create Working Memory-Related Neuronal Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2680-2689.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Baddeley, A. (2003). Working Memory: Looking back and Looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829-839.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Baddeley, A. (2007). Working Memory, Thought, and Action (Vol. 45). Oxford University Press.[CrossRef
[7] Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working Memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47-89.[CrossRef
[8] Bae, G.-Y., & Luck, S. J. (2018). Dissociable Decoding of Spatial Attention and Working Memory from EEG Oscillations and Sustained Potentials. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38, 409-422.[CrossRef
[9] Bae, G.-Y., & Luck, S. J. (2019). Reactivation of Previous Experiences in a Working Memory Task. Psychological Science, 30, 587-595.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bae, G.-Y., Leonard, C. J., Hahn, B., Gold, J. M., & Luck, S. J. (2020). Assessing the Information Content of ERP Signals in Schizophrenia Using Multivariate Decoding Methods. NeuroImage: Clinical, 25, Article ID: 102179.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Bonnefond, M., & Jensen, O. (2012). Alpha Oscillations Serve to Protect Working Memory Maintenance against Anticipated Distracters. Current Biology, 22, 1969-1974.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Cools, R., Miyakawa, A., Sheridan, M., & D’Esposito, M. (2010). Enhanced Frontal Function in Parkinson’s Disease. Brain, 133, 225-233.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). Eeglab: An Open Source Toolbox for Analysis of Single-Trial Eeg Dynamics Including Independent Component Analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Dietterich, T. G., & Bakiri, G. (1995). Solving Multiclass Learning Problems via Error-Correcting Output Codes. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2, 263-286.[CrossRef
[15] Dolcos, F., Miller, B., Kragel, P., Jha, A., & Mccarthy, G. (2007). Regional Brain Differences in the Effect of Distraction during the Delay Interval of a Working Memory Task. Brain Research, 1152, 171-181.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Drisdelle, B. L., Aubin, S., & Jolicoeur, P. (2017). Dealing with Ocular Artifacts on Lateralized ERPs in Studies of Visual-Spatial Attention and Memory: ICA Correction versus Epoch Rejection. Psychophysiology, 54, 83-99.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Foster, J. J., Sutterer, D. W., Serences, J. T., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2016). The Topography of Alpha-Band Activity Tracks the Content of Spatial Working Memory. Journal of Neurophysiology, 115, 168-177.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Frank, M. J., Loughry, B., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2001). Interactions be-tween Frontal Cortex and Basal Ganglia in Working Memory: A Computational Model. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 137-160.[CrossRef
[19] Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex. Science, 293, 2425-2430.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Haynes, J. D., & Rees, G. (2006). Decoding Mental states from Brain Activity in Humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 523-534.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Hebart, M. N., & Baker, C. I. (2018). Deconstructing Multivariate Decoding for the Study of Brain Function. Neuroimage, 180, 4-18.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Jung, T. P., Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Removal of Eye Activity Artifacts from Visual Event-Related Potentials in Normal and Clinical Subjects. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1745-1758.[CrossRef
[23] Koolhaas, J. M., Bartolomucci, A., Buwalda, B., Boer, S. F. D., Flügge, G., & Korte, S. M. (2011). Stress Revisited: A Critical Evaluation of the Stress Concept. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1291-1301.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An Open-Source Toolbox for the Analysis of Event-Related Potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article No. 213.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] McNab, F., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Dissociating Distractor-Filtering at Encoding and during Maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 960-967.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] McNab, F., & Klingberg, T. (2008). Prefrontal Cortex and Basal Ganglia Control Access to Working Memory. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 103-107.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1961). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 19, 338-340.[CrossRef
[28] Minamoto, T., Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (2010). Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Distractor Processing: Possible Contribution of Top-Down Inhibitory Control. Brain Research, 1335, 63-73.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Miyawaki, Y. et al. (2008). Visual Image Reconstruction from Human Brain Activity Using a Combination of Multiscale Local Image Decoders. Neuron, 60, 915-929.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Sakai, K., Rowe, J. B., & Passingham, R. E. (2002). Active Maintenance in Prefrontal Area 46 Creates Distractor-Resistant Memory. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 479-484.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Shields, G. S., Sazma, M. A., Mccullough, A. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2017). The Effects of Acute Stress on Episodic Memory: A Meta-Analysis and Integrative Review. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 636-675.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Smeets, T., & Cornelisse, S. (2012). Introducing the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (Mast): A Quick and Non-Invasive Approach to Elicit Robust Autonomic and Glucocorticoid Stress Responses. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, 1998-2008.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural Activity Predicts Individual Differences in Visual Working Memory Capacity. Nature, 428, 748-751.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural Measures Reveal Individual Differences in Controlling access to Working Memory. Nature, 438, 500-503.[CrossRef] [PubMed]