基于BMA-QM的福建区域降水预报订正及暴雨检验研究
Precipitation Forecast Correction and Rain-storm Test in Fujian Province Based on Bayesian Model Averaging-Quantile Map-ping Method
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2022.119716, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 吴国丽, 赵暐昊, 董 振:南京信息工程大学,江苏 南京;鲍艳松:南京信息工程大学,江苏 南京;南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心,江苏 南京;南京信息工程大学中国气象局气溶胶–云–降水重点开放实验室,江苏 南京;林 青, 潘 宁:福建省灾害天气重点实验室,福建 福州;福建省气象台,福建 福州
关键词: 贝叶斯模型平均分位数映射法降水偏差订正统计后处理Bayesian Model Averaging Quantile Mapping Method Precipitation Bias Revised Statistical Post-Processing
摘要: 以全球交互式大集合预报系统提供的六种模式模拟的福建省及其周边区域2019年至2020年的4月至6月的日降水数据结果作为降水预报资料,以国家气象信息中心多源融合降水格点产品作为降水观测资料。对降水预报资料进行贝叶斯模型平均(简称BMA)方法订正后,对BMA方法订正结果使用分位数映射法(简称QM)进行再订正。结果表明:1) BMA方法订正后,提升模式在晴雨和小雨的预报技巧,但在中雨和大雨中未体现出优势。2) BMA-QM方法订正后,保持晴雨处的预报技巧之余,提升了小雨处的预报技巧,尤其提高了大雨处的预报技巧。3) BMA-QM方法订正之下,暴雨TS (0.163)和暴雨ETS (0.147)的提升率分别为98.30%、108.16%。BMA-QM方法订正可以提升模式对强降水的预报技巧,这将对做出更为准确的暴雨预警有着重要的意义。
Abstract: The 24-hour cumulative precipitation data from April to June in Fujian Province and its surround-ing areas from 2019 to 2020 simulated by six models provided by TIGGE are used as precipitation forecast data. The grid precipitation observation data are provided by CMPA. After the precipitation forecast data were revised by Bayesian model averaging, the results of BMA were revised using quantile-mapping. The results show as follows: 1) After BMA revision, the forecasting skills of mod-els in clear-rainy and light rain have been improved, but there is no improvement in moderate rain and heavy rain. 2) After BMA-QM revision, the forecasting skill of light rain, especially heavy rain, are improved while maintaining the forecasting skill of clear-rainy. 3) After BMA-QM revision, Thereat Score (0.163) and Equitable Threat Score (0.147) in rainstorm increased by 98.30% and 108.16% respectively. The correction of BMA-QM can improve the prediction skills of heavy precip-itation, which is of great significance to make more accurate rainstorm warning.
文章引用:吴国丽, 鲍艳松, 林青, 潘宁, 赵暐昊, 董振. 基于BMA-QM的福建区域降水预报订正及暴雨检验研究[J]. 应用数学进展, 2022, 11(9): 6755-6767. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2022.119716

参考文献

[1] 杜钧, 陈静. 天气预报的公众评价与发布形式的变革[J]. 气象, 2010, 36(1): 1-6.
[2] Raftery, A.E., Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., et al. (2005) Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Calibrate Forecast Ensembles. Monthly Weather Re-view, 133, 1155-1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 苏翔, 袁慧玲. 集合预报统计学后处理技术研究进展[J]. 气象科技进展, 2020, 10(2): 30-41.
[4] Ingene, C.A. and Leamer, E.E. (1980) Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 周梦瑶, 袁飞, 江善虎, 等. 基于贝叶斯模型平均的赣江与汉江流域多气候模式集合研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2021, 39(9): 1-5.
[6] 吴裕珍, 钟逸轩, 王大刚, 等. 基于贝叶斯模式平均的东江流域降雨概率预报[J]. 热带地理, 2015, 35(6): 860-872.
[7] 祁海霞, 彭涛, 林春泽, 等. 清江流域降水的多模式BMA概率预报试验[J]. 气象, 2020, 46(1): 108-118.
[8] Javanshiri, Z., Fathi, M. and Mohammadi, S.A. (2021) Comparison of the BMA and EMOS Statistical Methods for Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting. Meteorological Applications, 28, e1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Sloughter, J.M.L., Raftery, A.E., Gneiting, T., et al. (2007) Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting Using Bayesian Model Averaging. Monthly Weather Review, 135, 3209-3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 周洁琴. 基于贝叶斯模型平均的东北地区降水概率预报[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2021.[CrossRef
[11] 雷华锦, 马佳培, 李弘毅, 等. 基于分位数映射法的黑河上游气候模式降水误差订正[J]. 高原气象, 2020, 39(2): 266-279.
[12] 包慧濛, 郭达烽, 李葳. 基于频率匹配法的江西省ECMWF降水预报订正研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2022, 38(2): 12-20.
[13] 智协飞, 吕游. 基于频率匹配法的中国降水多模式预报订正研究[J]. 大气科学学报, 2019, 42(6): 814-823.
[14] Hamill, T.M., Engle, E., Myrick, D., et al. (2017) The US National Blend of Models for Statistical Postprocessing of Probability of Precipitation and Deterministic Precipitation Amount. Monthly Weather Review, 145, 3441-3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 喻雪晴, 穆振侠. 降水资料匮乏地区不同再分析数据降尺度效果的评价[J]. 水电能源科学, 2020, 38(9): 5-8+23.
[16] 韩振宇, 童尧, 高学杰, 等. 分位数映射法在RegCM4中国气温模拟订正中的应用[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2018, 14(4): 331-340.
[17] 罗小莉, 姚才, 肖志祥, 等. 近60年来登陆华南热带气旋降水的气候变化特征及其成因[J]. 海洋预报, 2020, 37(4): 76-85.
[18] 刘远驰. 基于降雨数值预报的山洪灾害动态预警模式研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2021.