基于瓶颈神经网络的轨迹嵌入技术及其在飞行目标轨迹分类中的应用
Trajectory Embedding Based on Bottleneck Neural Network and Its Application on Trajectory Classification of Aircrafts
DOI: 10.12677/CSA.2022.1210244, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 雷 磊:中国电子科技集团公司第十研究所,四川 成都
关键词: 轨迹嵌入轨迹分类轨迹特征提取瓶颈神经网络Trajectory Embedding Trajectory Classification Trajectory Feature Extraction Bottleneck Nerual Network
摘要: 轨迹分类是利用目标运动轨迹识别出目标类型的技术。如何从轨迹数据中提取出可分性好的轨迹特征一直是轨迹分类的研究重点。本论文提出了基于神经网络的轨迹嵌入方法,从轨迹数据中提取可分性较好的轨迹特征。该方法首先从轨迹数据中提取局部和全局特征,组成高维度的特征向量;然后将这些高维度向量带入瓶颈神经网络(bottleneck NN, b-NN),得到低维度的超向量,称为t-vector。因为b-NN将高维度的特征向量投影到低维度的“通用坐标”空间中,对特征向量进行了校准和压缩,所以t-vector在超向量空间中具有较低的维度和较好的可分性。实验表明,t-vector能够提升分类模型5%以上的准确率,并使其检测代价值(detection cost function, DCF)较低,有效提高了飞行目标轨迹分类的性能。
Abstract: Trajectory classification is a technique which classifies the objects based on their trajectory. The key of trajectory classification is to find the discriminative features that better dicriminate the class. This paper proposes a trajectory embedding method based on neural network to extract the discriminative features from trajectory data. This proposed method extracted the local and global features having high demension from raw trajectory data at first, and then obtained the low-demension supervector named t-vector using the bottleneck nerual network (b-NN). Due to the b-NN maps the high-dimension vectors into a low-deminson “common coordinate” space, the t-vector had low deminson and good discrimination when doing similarity computations in the supervector space. The experimental results shown the classification model with t-vector obtained more than 5% accuracy, and obtained lower detection cost function (DCF), which improved the performance of the trajectory classification.
文章引用:雷磊. 基于瓶颈神经网络的轨迹嵌入技术及其在飞行目标轨迹分类中的应用[J]. 计算机科学与应用, 2022, 12(10): 2384-2394. https://doi.org/10.12677/CSA.2022.1210244

参考文献

[1] Silva, C.L., Petry, L.M. and Bogomy, V. (2019) A Survey and Comparison of Trajectory Classification Methods. 2019 8th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS), Salvador, 15-18 October 2019, 788-793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Hammad, A.W.A., Rey, D., Bu-Qammaz, A., et al. (2020) Mathematical Optimization in Enhancing the Sustainability of Aircaft Trajectory: A Review. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14, 413-436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Murca, M.C.R., Hansman, R.J., Li, L., et al. (2018) Flight Trajectory Data Analytics for Characterization of Air Traffic Flows: A Comparative Analysis of Terminal Area Opera-tions between New Tork, Hong Kong and Sao Paulo. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 97, 324-347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Gaiduchenko, N.E. and Gritsyk, P.A. (2019) Hypersonic Vehicle Trajectory Classification Using Convolutional Neural Network. Proceeding of International Conference on En-gineering and Telecommuication, Dolgoprudny, 20-21 November 2019, 1-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] May, P.L., Leite, D.S., Esuli, A., et al. (2020) MARC: A Robust Method for Multiple-Aspect Trajectory Classification via Space, Time and Semantic Embedding. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34, 1428-1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Lee, J.G., Han, J. and Li, X., et al. (2008) TraClass: Trajec-tory Classfiication Using Hierarchical Region-Based and Trajectory-Based Clustering. VLDB Endowment, 1, 1081-1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Ferrero, C.A., Alvares, L.O., Zalewski, W., et al. (2018) MOVELETS: Exploring Relevant Subtrajectories for Robust Trakectory Classficiation. Proceeding of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Pau, 9-13 April 2018, 849-856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Kowalek, P., Loch-Olszewska, H. and Szwabirinski, J. (2019) Classification of Diffusion Modes in Single-Particle Tracking Data: Feature-Based versus Deep-Learning Approach. Physical Review E, 100, Article ID: 032410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Cui, P., Wang, X., Pei, J., et al. (2019) A Survey on Network Embedding. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 31, 833-852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Pandey, S., Mathur, I. and Joshi, N. (2021) Hybrid Model with Word2vector in Information Retrieval Ranking. In: Khanna, A., Gupta, D., Pólkowski, Z., Bhattacharyya, S. and Castillo, O., Eds., Data Analytics and Management, Vol. 54, 761-773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Katsurada, K. and Richmond, K. (2020) Speaker-Independent Mel-Cepstrum Esimation from Articulator Movements Using D-Vector Input. Proceeding of Interspeech 2020, Shang-hai, 25-29 October 2020, 3176-3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Mary, S., Metilda, N.J., Umesh, S., et al. (2021) S-Vector and TESA: Speaker Embeddings and a Speaker Autheticator Based on Transformer Encoder. IEEE Transactions on Au-dio, Speech and Language Processing, 30, 404-413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Tang, W., Li, B., Tian, S., et al. (2019) CNN-Based Adver-sarial Embedding for Image Steganography. IEEE TRANSA- CTIONS on Information Forensics and Security, 14, 2074-2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Mazher, A. (2020) Visualization Framework for High-Dimensional Spatio-Temporal Hydrological Gridded Datasets using Machine-Learning Techniques. Water, 12, Ar-ticle No. 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Gutman, Y., Qiao, T. and Tsukamoto, M. (2019) Applica-tion of Signal Analysis to the Embedding Problem of Zk-Actions. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 29, 1440-1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Lu, Q., Silva, N., Kafle, S., et al. (2019) Learning Electonic Health Records through Hyperbolic Embedding of Medical Ontologies. Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics, Niagara Falls, 7-10 September 2019, 338-346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Kinnunen, T. and Li, H. (2010) An Overview of Text-Independent Speaker Recognition: From Features to Supervectors. Speech Communication, 52, 12-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Wang, S., Yang, Y., Wang, T., et al. (2019) Knowledge Distil-lanation for Small Foot-Print Deep Speaker Embedding. ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acous-tics, Speech and Signal Processing, Brighton, 12-17 May 2019, 6021-6025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Dodge, S., Weibel, R. and Forootan, E. (2009) Revealing the Physics of Movement: Comparing the Similairty of Movement Characteristics of Different Types of Moving Objects. Computers, Environment and Urban System, 33, 419-434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Zhibin, X., Yang, W., Kun, F., et al. (2017) Identify Different Transportation Models from Trajectory Data Using Tree-Based Ensemble Classifiers. International Journal of Geo-Information, 6, Article No. 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Yang, X., Stewart, K., Tang, L., et al. (2018) A Review of GPS Trajecto-ries Classification Based on Transportation Mode. Sensors, 18, Article No. 3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Amjad R A and Geiger, B.C. (2020) Learning Representations for Neural Network-Based Classification Using the Information Bottleneck Principle. IEEE Transcations on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 42, 2225-2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Variani, E., Lei, X., McDermott, E., et al. (2014) Deep Neural Networks for Small Footprint Text-Dependent Speaker Verification. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Florence, 4-9 May 2014, 4052-4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Wang, B., Chen, Z., Zhu, A.X., et al. (2019) Multi-Level Classification Based on Trajectory Features of Time Series for Monitoring Impervious Surface Expansions. Remote Sensing, 11, Article No. 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef