基于知识图谱分析的大学生核心素养结构研究
Research on the Structure of College Students’ Core Competency Based on Knowledge Graph Analysis
DOI: 10.12677/AE.2022.1211746, PDF,  被引量    国家社会科学基金支持
作者: 时 勘*, 宋旭东#, 周 薇, 庄紫祺:温州大学教育学院,浙江 温州;温州模式发展研究院,浙江 温州
关键词: 大学生核心素养胜任特征模型知识图谱分析可视化演示方法College Students Core Competency Competency Model Knowledge Graph Analysis Visual Presentation Method
摘要: 本研究通过知识图谱分析等检索技术,对于当代大学生核心素养、即核心胜任特征要求进行了文献计量学分析,文献数据来源于CNKI中核心期刊CSSCI数据库和WOS数据库,进行了发文量分析,特别是基于Citespace6.1.R1 (64-bit)软件进行作者合作以及关键词的共现、聚类与时区分析,最终形成了科学知识图谱的可视化结果。目前,从整体结果来看,美国等西方发达国家在核心素养研究的规模和影响效应方面具有较大的优势,国内此类研究虽然初具规模,但素养教育的落脚点在于多集中于针对如何帮助学生个人发展方面,但是,怎样通过“教学”、“课程”、“学科”、“培养模式”和“战略布局”等内容的变革,特别是结合外部挑战的背景下,建构大学生的核心胜任特征模型,进而在素养教育的整体结构方面进行变革,尚缺乏从人才强国的战略布局和具体的培养模式的路径和方法开展系统的工作,本文在此基础上提出了对策建议。
Abstract: In the study, bibliometric analysis was conducted for the core competence, i.e., core competency characteristics requirements of contemporary college students through knowledge graph analysis and other retrieval techniques. Literature data were obtained from core journals in CNKI CSSCI and WOS databases, and the analysis of the volume of publications was conducted, especially based on Citespace 6.1.R1 (64-bit) software for author collaboration as well as cooccurrence of keywords, clustering and time zone analysis, and finally the visualization results of the scientific knowledge graph were formed. At present, from the overall results, the United States and other developed Western countries have a greater advantage in terms of the scale and impact of core competency research. Although such research in China is taking shape, the landing point of literacy education is mostly focused on how to help students’ personal development. However, how to construct the core competency model of college students through the changes of teaching, curriculum, discipline, training mode and strategic layout, especially in the context of external challenges, and then make changes in the overall structure of literacy education, is still short of systematic work on the strategic layout and the path and method of specific training mode in a talented country. On this basis, the study puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions.
文章引用:时勘, 宋旭东, 周薇, 庄紫祺. 基于知识图谱分析的大学生核心素养结构研究[J]. 教育进展, 2022, 12(11): 4892-4903. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2022.1211746

参考文献

[1] 瞿振元. 素质教育要再出发[J]. 中国高教研究, 2017(4): 26-29+36.
[2] 张应强, 张洋磊. 从科技发展新趋势看培养大学生核心素养[J]. 高等教育研究, 2017, 38(12): 73-80.
[3] 褚宏启. 核心素养的概念与本质[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2016, 34(1): 1-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 于冰. 中学思想政治课创设“问题情境”的策略探讨[J]. 课程∙教材∙教法, 2008(5): 56-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] DeSeCo (2003) The Definition and Selection of Key Com-petencies: Executive Summary.
https://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf
[6] 林崇德. 21世纪学生发展核心素养研究[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2016.
[7] 杨建敏. 以价值引领为导向的大学生核心素养培育路径[J]. 中学政治教学参考, 2021(23): 103.
[8] 张应强, 黄捷扬. 培养大学生核心素养与深化高等教育评价改革[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(6): 62-71.
[9] 谢小庆. 审辩式思维在创造力发展中的重要性[J]. 内蒙古教育, 2014(11): 13-15.
[10] 王洪礼. 素质教育理论及其课堂教学实践操作之探讨[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2003(3): 105-109.
[11] 程龙. 综合素质评价对学生发展核心素养评价的启示[J]. 现代教育管理, 2019(12): 36-42.
[12] McClelland, D.C. (1973) Testing for Competence Rather than for “Intelligence”. The American Psychologist, 28, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Spencer Jr., L.M. and Spencer, S.M. (1993) Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. Wiley, New York.
[14] 薛澜, 王建民. 知识经济与R&D全球化:中国面对的机遇和挑战[J]. 国际经济评论, 1999(Z2): 24-28.
[15] 王一兵. 大学自主与大学法人化的新诉求——全球化知识经济带来的挑战[J]. 高等教育研究, 2001, 22(3): 10-15+19.
[16] 胡莉芳, 龚丽鑫. 核心素养生成的知识逻辑:以大学生信息素养为例[J]. 现代大学教育, 2022, 38(3): 95-101.
[17] 时勘著. 核心胜任特征成长评估模型研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022.
[18] 林崇德. 中国学生核心素养研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 145-154.
[19] 张可, 杨萌. “和合”文化对大学生心理健康教育的价值[J]. 中国成人教育, 2017(9): 88-91.
[20] The Partnership for 21st Century Learning. P21 Framework Definitions. http://www.p21.org
[21] 黄四林, 张叶, 莫雷, 张文新, 李红, 林崇德. 核心素养框架下创新素养的关键指标[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(2): 27-36.