法院对交通事故认定书的审查路径探究——以交通肇事罪的认定为视角
On the Court’s Review of the Traffic Accident Confirmation Letter—Taking the Identification of Traffic Accident Crime as the Perspective
摘要: 在交通肇事罪的认定中,法院对交通事故认定书近乎“免审”,这极可能损害交通肇事罪认定的程序正义及实体正义。因此,必须加强对作为证据的交通事故认定书的司法审查,排除不具有证据资格的交通事故认定书。同时,必须以刑法规定的定罪标准对交通事故认定书进行实质审查,确定其是否具有证明力,从而避免将交通违法行为错误地升格为交通肇事罪。
Abstract:
In the determination of the crime of traffic accident, the court’s determination of the traffic accident is almost “exempt from trial”, which is very likely to damage the procedural justice and substantive justice of the crime of traffic accident. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the judicial examination of the traffic accident confirmation as evidence, and exclude the traffic accident confirmation that is not qualified for evidence. At the same time, we must substantially examine the identification of the traffic accident with the conviction standard stipulated in the criminal law to determine whether it has the probative power, so as to avoid wrongly upgrading the traffic violation to the crime of traffic accident.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
余凌云. 道路交通事故责任认定研究[J]. 法学研究, 2016(6): 130.
|
|
[2]
|
刘东根. 道路交通事故责任及认定的性质[J]. 行政法学研究, 2002(4): 35.
|
|
[3]
|
曹锋. 交通事故责任认定书的审查与运用[J]. 中国检察官, 2017(10): 63.
|
|
[4]
|
张泽涛. 论刑事诉讼非法证据排除规则的虚置——行政证据与刑事证据衔接的程序风险透视[J]. 政法论坛, 2019(5): 70.
|
|
[5]
|
刘宪权, 陆敏一. 交通事故行政责任与交通肇事刑事责任辨析[J]. 人民检察, 2019(24): 11.
|
|
[6]
|
刘东根. 道路交通事故责任与交通肇事罪的构成[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报, 2005(2): 56.
|
|
[7]
|
岗特·施特拉腾韦特, 洛塔尔·库伦. 刑法总论——犯罪论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2006: 406.
|
|
[8]
|
赵俊峰. 论刑事定罪适用行政推定之合理性[J]. 法制与社会, 2009(6): 84-85.
|
|
[9]
|
张明楷. 交通肇事的刑事责任认定[J]. 人民检察, 2008(2): 5.
|