专利侵权中侵权产品制造者的认定
Determination of the Manufacturer of the In-fringing Product in Patent Infringement
摘要: 专利侵权产品制造者认定的难点主要在于,制造行为深埋于产品制销链最深处,使权利人获得制造行为的证据极其困难,又加之现代化商业模式复杂多样,很难确定制造者认定的统一标准。在专利侵权中,侵权者是否可以被识别为制造商,是决定侵权者责任大小和责任形式的重要因素,而且与侵权人能否行使“合法来源”抗辩从而以“善意”侵权豁免赔偿责任直接相关。为了使专利侵权中制造者的认定更为明确,一方面应当进一步统一指导性意见,另一方面应当完善类案检索机制,同时对举证责任进行不同于普通民事诉讼案件的合理化分配,即灵活运用举证责任倒置,以此使得专利侵权中制造者认定的路径更为清晰明了,减少相关纠纷的产生,防止在诉讼活动中因制造者认定而产生的多次拉扯,节约司法资源。
Abstract: The difficulty in identifying the manufacturer of a patent infringement lies mainly in the fact that the manufacturing act is buried deep in the deepest part of the product manufacturing and marketing chain, making it extremely difficult for the right holder to obtain evidence of the manufacturing act, and coupled with the complexity and diversity of modern business models, it is also difficult for the court to determine a uniform standard for identifying the manufacturer. In patent infringement, whether the infringer can be identified as a manufacturer is a factor in determining the infringer’s liability for infringement, and is related to whether the infringer can use the “lawful source” to defense and obtain the identity of a “bona fide” infringer to exempt himself from liability. In order to make the determination of the maker in patent infringement clearer, on the one hand, we should further unify the guiding opinions, on the other hand, we should improve the mechanism of case search, and at the same time, we should rationalize the allocation of the burden of proof different from that of ordinary civil litigation cases, i.e., flexibly use the reversal of the burden of proof, so as to make the path of the determination of the maker in patent infringement clearer, reduce the related disputes, and prevent multiple pulls in litigation activities arising from the identification of the manufacturer, and save judicial resources.
文章引用:杨阳. 专利侵权中侵权产品制造者的认定[J]. 法学, 2023, 11(1): 19-31. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2023.111004

参考文献

[1] 尹新天. 中国专利法详解[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2011.
[2] 骆俊峰. 专利善意侵权的二元归责论研究[J]. 浙江海洋学院学报(人文科学版), 2016(6): 61-65.
[3] 乐耀. 论专利善意侵权案件中不当得利制度的不可适用性——兼评<专利法>第70条[J]. 金陵法律评论, 2017(1): 197-221.
[4] 黄建文. 合法来源抗辩适用善意取得制度审查的合理性分析[J]. 知识产权, 2016(10): 32-38.
[5] 郑思成. 侵权知识产权的无过错责任[J]. 中国法学, 1998(1): 81-90.
[6] 郑成思. 知识产权论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003.
[7] 于剑. 知识产权领域善意侵权分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2015.
[8] 吴汉东. 知识产权侵权诉讼中的过错责任推定与赔偿数额认定——以举证责任规则为视角[J]. 法学评论, 2014(5): 124-130.