建议者选择中的热情优先效应
The Primacy of Warmth in Advisor Selection
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.131033, PDF,   
作者: 康晓璇, 孙钰茜, 董峰源, 王修欣*：曲阜师范大学心理学院，山东 济宁
关键词: 建议者选择；热情；能力；决策；Advisor Selection； Warmth； Competence； Decision-Making
摘要: 在几乎任何专业领域，选择好的建议者是成功的关键。那么在现实生活中，人们会如何选择建议者？本文从社会认知的热情–能力模型出发，采用两个实验探究了人们在选择建议者时更看重热情还是能力特质。实验1通过文字描述呈现建议者的特质信息，实验2使用更为客观的评分方式呈现。两个实验较为一致地表明，人们在选择建议者时更看重热情而非能力。这些发现揭示了建议者选择中的热情优先效应，对现实中的建议者选择具有一定的启示和借鉴意义。
Abstract: In almost any professional field, choosing a good advisor is the key to success. So how do people choose their advisors in real life? In present study, we used two experiments to investigate whether people value more warmth or competence when choosing advisors based on the Big Two Model. Experiment 1 presented information about the attributes of the advice-givers through textual descriptions, while Experiment 2 used a more objective scale. The two experiments were relatively consistent in showing that people valued warmth more than competence when choosing advisors. These findings reveal the primacy of warmth in advisor selection and have implications into practice.
文章引用：康晓璇, 孙钰茜, 董峰源, 王修欣 (2023). 建议者选择中的热情优先效应. 心理学进展, 13(1), 266-274. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.131033

参考文献

[1] 孙露莹, 陈琳, 段锦云(2017). 决策过程中的建议采纳:策略、影响及未来展望. 心理科学进展, 25(1), 169-179.
[2] 王修欣, 王希, 王晓明(2022). 建议者选择及其中的自我-他人决策差异. 心理技术与应用, 10(2), 112-120.
[3] 徐惊蛰, 谢晓非(2011). 解释水平视角下的自己-他人决策差异. 心理学报, 43(1), 11-20.
[4] 张庆, 王美芳(2011). 社会判断内容的基本维度研究. 心理科学, 34(4), 899-904.
[5] 佐斌, 代涛涛, 温芳芳, 索玉贤(2015). 社会认知内容的“大二”模型. 心理科学, 38(4), 1019-1023.
[6] 佐斌, 代涛涛, 温芳芳, 滕婷婷(2014). 热情与能力的关系及其影响因素. 心理科学进展, 22(9), 1467-1474.
[7] Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and Communion from the Perspective of Self versus Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Bailey, P. E., Leon, T., Ebner, N. C., Moustafa, A. A., & Weidemann, G. (2022). A Meta-Analysis of the Weight of Advice in Decision-Making. Current Psychology.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Budescu, D. V., & Rantilla, A. K. (2000). Confidence in Aggregation of Expert Opinions. Acta Psychologica, 104, 371-398.[CrossRef] 
[10] Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E.L. (1988). A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.[CrossRef] 
[11] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.[CrossRef] 
[12] Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2008). Blinded by Anger or Feeling the Love: How Emotions Influence Advice Taking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1165-1173.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Gino, F., Brooks, A. W., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2012). Anxiety, Advice, and the Ability to Discern: Feeling Anxious Motivates Individuals to Seek and Use Advice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 497-512.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Heath, C., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Interaction with Others Increases Decision Confidence But Not Decision Quality: Evidence against Information Collection Views of Interactive Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 305-326.[CrossRef] 
[16] Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 346-380.[CrossRef] 
[17] Hur, J. D., Ruttan, R. L., & Shea, C. T. (2020). The Unexpected Power of Positivity: Predictions versus Decisions about Advisor Selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 1969-1986.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] List, J. A. (2004). Neoclassical Theory versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace. Econometrica, 72, 615-625.[CrossRef] 
[19] Minson, J. A., Liberman, V., & Ross, L. (2011). Two to Tango: Effects of Collaboration and Disagreement on Dyadic Judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1325-1338.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Noe, R. A., Greenberger, D. B., & Sheng, W. (2002). Mentoring: What We Know and Where We Might Go. Research in Personnel & Human Resources Management, 21, 129-173.[CrossRef] 
[21] Polman, E. (2012). Effects of Self-Other Decision Making on Regulatory Focus and Choice Overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 980-993.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Ruttan, R. L., & Nordgren, L. F. (2016). The Strength to Face the Facts: Self-Regulation Defends against Defensive Information Processing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 86-98.[CrossRef] 
[23] Schrah, G. E., Dalal, R. S., & Sniezek, J. A. (2006). No Deci-sion-Maker Is an Island: Integrating Expert Advice with Information Acquisition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 43-60.[CrossRef] 
[24] Sniezek, J. A., & Buckley, T. (1995). Cueing and Cognitive Conflict in Judge-Advisor Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 159-174.[CrossRef] 
[25] Trope, Y., & Brickman, P. (1975). Difficulty and Diagnosticity as Determinants of Choice among Tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 918-925.[CrossRef] 
[26] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.[CrossRef] 
[27] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First Impressions: Making Up Your Mind after a 100 Ms Exposure to a Face. Psychological Science, 17, 592-598.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Wojciszke, B., & Abele, A. E. (2008). The Primacy of Communion over Agency and Its Reversals in Evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139-1147.[CrossRef] 
[30] Ybarra, O., Chan, E., Park, H., Bumstein, E., Monin, B., & Stanik, C. (2008). Life’s Recurring Challenges and the Fundamental Dimensions: An Integration and Its Implications for Cultural Differences and Similarities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1083-1092.[CrossRef] 
[31] Ybarra, O., Chan, E., & Park, D. (2001). Young and Old Adults’ Concerns about Morality and Competence. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 85-100.[CrossRef] 
[32] Zhao, M., Hoeffler, S., & Zauberman, G. (2007). Mental Simulation and Preference Consistency over Time: The Role of Process-versus-Outcome-Focused Thoughts. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 379-388.[CrossRef]