贵阳市地铁沿线InSAR地表沉降监测及GA-BP神经网络形变预测
InSAR Surface Subsidence Monitoring and GA-BP Neural Network Deformation Prediction along Guiyang Metro
摘要: 针对贵阳市城市建设中存在岩溶塌陷问题,基于SBAS-InSAR技术处理118景Sentinel-1A影像,获取贵阳市主城区2018年1月~2021年12月地表形变信息并与PS-InSAR监测结果进行交叉验证,基于此对研究区明显沉降区和地铁沿线150 m区域做沉降分析,最后用遗传算法改进的BP神经网络对沉降序列进行预测分析。结果表明:监测时间范围内,研究区地表沉降速率集中在−5 mm/a~1 mm/a,整体较为稳定,研究区无大范围明显沉降现象,存在部分明显沉降区,都存在山体开挖的现象,主要与人类活动有关。3条地铁沿线沉降整体稳定,每条线路存在1~2处明显沉降区;结合光学历史影像和城市规划资料分析,这些沉降主要与工程施工有关。改进的BP神经网络相较于标准BP神经网络有更好表现,绝对误差、均方根误差均为最小。
Abstract: Aiming at the problem of karst subsidence in the urban construction of Guiyang City, 118 scenes of Sentinel-1A images were processed based on SBAS-InSAR technology, and the surface deformation information of the main urban area of Guiyang City from January 2018 to December 2021 was ob-tained and crossed with the monitoring results of PS-InSAR. For verification, based on this, the settlement analysis of the obvious subsidence area in the research area and the 150 m area along the subway line is carried out, and finally the BP neural network improved by the genetic algorithm is used to predict and analyze the subsidence sequence. The results show that: within the monitoring time range, the surface subsidence rate in the study area is concentrated at −5 mm/a~1 mm/a, and the overall is relatively stable. There is no large-scale obvious subsidence phenomenon in the study area, and there are some obvious subsidence areas, all of which have the phenomenon of mountain excavation, mainly related to human activities. The settlement along the three subway lines is generally stable, and there are 1 or 2 obvious settlement areas in each line; combined with the analysis of optical historical images and urban planning data, these settlements are mainly re-lated to engineering construction. Compared with the standard BP neural network, the improved BP neural network has better performance, and the absolute error and root mean square error are the smallest.
文章引用:吴永俊, 汪泓, 杨晨. 贵阳市地铁沿线InSAR地表沉降监测及GA-BP神经网络形变预测[J]. 理论数学, 2023, 13(3): 453-467. https://doi.org/10.12677/PM.2023.133050

参考文献

[1] 宋小庆. 影响贵阳地下空间开发的环境地质因素分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017, 13(S2): 503-507.
[2] 罗孝芹. 贵阳龙洞堡机场岩溶发育规律及控制因素研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2017.
[3] 郝江南, 袁志英. 贵阳市中华北路岩溶塌陷成因及处理[J]. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 27(3): 122-125.
[4] 林珲, 马培峰, 王伟玺. 监测城市基础设施健康的星载MT-InSAR方法介绍[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(10): 1421-1433.
[5] 张诗玉, 李陶, 夏耶. 基于InSAR技术的城市地面沉降灾害监测研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2008, 33(8): 850-853, 858.
[6] 朱建军, 李志伟, 胡俊. InSAR变形监测方法与研究进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(10): 1717-1733.
[7] Ferretti, A., Fumagalli, A., Novali, F., et al. (2011) A New Algorithm for Processing Interferometric Data-Stacks: SqueeSAR. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49, 3460-3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Berardino, P., Fornaro, G., Lanari, R. and Sansosti, E. (2002) A New Algorithm for Surface Deformation Monitoring Based on Small Baseline Differential SAR Interferograms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40, 2375-2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 郭在洁, 陶秋香, 王凤云, 韩宇. SBAS InSAR与GM(1,1)模型在青岛地铁13号线地表形变监测中的应用[J]. 铁道建筑, 2021, 61(8): 73-78.
[10] 周吕, 李佳豪, 王成, 等. 基于时序InSAR的上海地区2018~2020地铁沿线沉降监测分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2021, 41(11): 1177-1182.
[11] 刘琦, 岳国森, 丁孝兵, 等. 佛山地铁沿线时序InSAR形变时空特征分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2019, 44(7): 1099-1106.
[12] 覃纹, 黄秋燕, 庾露, 胡宝清. 南宁在建地铁沿线地表沉降监测[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(9): 1467-1478.
[13] 弓永峰, 王辉, 吴学华, 等. 基于时序InSAR的宁夏西吉县滑坡灾害隐患识别[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2022, 29(6): 114-121.
[14] 周定义, 左小清. 基于SBAS-InSAR和PSO-BP神经网络算法的矿区地表沉降监测及预测[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(5): 895-905.
[15] 张雪琪. 时序InSAR技术用于高填方区域地面沉降监测与预测——以延安新区为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2021.
[16] 胡胜利, 钱旭, 钟峰. 基于遗传算法和人工神经网络的煤层厚度预测[J]. 中国煤炭, 2010, 36(2): 69-71, 76.
[17] 仲云飞, 梅一韬, 吴邦彬, 陈端. 遗传算法优化BP神经网络在大坝扬压力预测中的应用[J]. 水电能源科学, 2012, 30(6): 98-101.
[18] 刘子军. 基于Pearson相关系数的低渗透砂岩油藏重复压裂井优选方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2022, 29(2): 140-144.
[19] 赵鹏, 雷斌. 轨道交通工程建设风险管理的研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2012, 8(S2): 1818-1823.
[20] 谢劭峰, 赵云, 李国弘, 周志浩. GA-BP神经网络的GPS可降水量预测[J]. 测绘科学, 2020, 45(3): 33-38.